I have witnessed a change in the Hampton additive screen some years ago - on
purpose - the formulation simply did not work OK. So I guess there are
changes occasionally.
Jan
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Chris Morris chris.mor...@stfc.ac.ukwrote:
HI,
I've recently seen two examples where
Dear John,
It is not the sequence identity/similarity that counts, but how similar
the protein folds are. For many protein families, the fold is identical
although the sequence identity is very low. With 25% sequence identity
and presumably a protein from the same family, I give you a good chance
Op 8/24/2011 17:21, Chris Morris schreef:
Hi Chris,
Yes, I have seen quite a few inconsistencies in screen formulations.
Errors in listed conditions include recipe changes, but also typos both
in the vendor description and in the database entries. At the moment I'm
building a list of all
Dear Flip,
I think with respect to the Formulatrix database, it would be useful to
have the date of entry into the database for each screen input. I agree
that there are discrepancies in the database, but they can generally be
traced to a change from one catalog to the next. If you have the date
Dear Crystallographers,
once again I am filled with graditude to this list--there were many
helpful responses and even some geek humor. I have decided to go with
a dual-boot windows7/linux, which seems easy enough. All the best, and
thanks everyone for your quick and helpful advice.
Jacob Keller
On Aug 31, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Yuri Pompeu wrote:
After i get my output file from baverage containing the average b-
factor and rms by residues,
How can I calculate and display the average (and or mean) B-factors?
Is there a way of calculating it by protein, ligands and solvent
separately?
I was playing around with PDBe PISA and came across the following:
For pdb entry 1OYA. The most promising interface has an area bury of around
720A^2 and DeltaG of -10.6Kcal/mol. sym_op(y,x,-z+1) and CSS of 0.039!
Assembly analysis says it has no strong indications that point to stable