Dear Gerard K,
Many thanks indeed for this.
Like Gerard Bricogne you also indicate that the location option being the
decentralised one is 'quite simple and very cheap in terms of centralised
cost'. The SR Facilities worldwide I hope can surely follow the lead taken by
Diamond Light Source and
One important issue to address is how deal with the perceived
reliability issues of the federated model and how to start to
approach the higher reliability of the centralized model described bu
Gerard K, but without incurring what seems to be at present
unacceptable costs. One answer comes from
Dear Herbert,
I imagine it likely that eg The Univ Manchester eScholar system will have in
place duplicate storage for the reasons you outline below. However for it to be
geographically distant is, to my reckoning, less likely, but still possible. I
will add that further query to my first query
Dear John,
Most sound institutional data repositories use some form of
off-site backup. However, not all of them do, and the
standards of reliabilty vary. The advantages of an explicit
partnering system are both practical and psychological. The
practical part is the major improvement in
I have few personal remarks about revere matrix seeding protocol suggested here
just an addition to Artems suggested protocol
harvesting the whole drop of interest invite guaranteed
salt crystals in the second round especially if one is
using the same screen back.
If one found crystals all over
Hm,
I wouldn't call these micro crystals anymore, I mount those things and get
datasets from them (sometimes). In my world 50 µm is defined as big.
Jürgen
On Oct 29, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Pius Padayatti wrote:
In short if you found microcrystals (15 to 20 um)
harvesting them is what i found is
