Driven by recent advances in this field we will hold a workshop to discuss
it. The workshop will be on Monday, May 15, 2017 at Brookhaven Nat'l
Laboratory, and will be affiliated with the 2017 Users' Meeting for
NSLS-II and the Center for Functional Nanomaterials.
The current draft agenda is
I'd expect imposing Ramachandran restraints to lower the Rfree or at least the
gap between R and Free, otherwise I would not do it. If there were genuine
Ramachandran outliers, the restrained model might not have these included,
while these outliers could potentially be very interesting. Of
I must also credit Robbie with the easiest (most elegant?) solution to
my question.
You run 0 cycles of refmac with the mixed B factor model.
Thanks all for your inputs.
Best wishes
Nick
--
Prof Nicholas H. Keep
Executive Dean of School of Science
Professor of Biomolecular Science
Normally, these days at least, a model that is result of TLS refinement
contains total B factor in ANISOU records and its TLS component in TLS
records (REMARK3), with Btotal = Btls+Bresidual.
If TLS matrices are available, it's trivial to calculate Btls from TLS
matrices in REMARK3 and subtract
Hi Eleanor,
This is covered in PDB_REDO: we figure out whether the B-factors are totals or
residuals. Wouter Touw has made the BDB (http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/bdb/) a databank
in which all B-factors are represented as the isotropic component of the total
B-factor. This is quite useful if you want
A NIH funded postdoctoral fellow position for CryoEM and/or protein
crystallography is available immediately in Dr. Xu’s laboratory at the
Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry at North Carolina State
University. Research in Xu lab focuses on structural elucidation of protein
The very excellent Dr Clive Metcalfe (an ex-post-doc with me) of NIBSC has
a PhD project with Prof Paul Dalby at UCL looking at disulphide bond
reduction in monoclonal antibodies.
If you have a good student who might be interested please point them to
https://www.prism.ucl.ac.uk/#!/?project=205
Actually I think it is pretty dangerous to trust the TLS stuff in the PDB
header - there is a muddle between B_residual and B_merged and no adequate
description in the header.
Unless you are planning on doing many many repeats I would re-refine before
checking the map...
eleanor
On 8 March 2017
Hi Evette,
(1) best practices in refining against lower resolution data (~4 angstrom)
> to achieve the best model,
>
obtain a model that fits data best under requirement that it has zero
geometry violations (Ramachandran, Cbeta deviations, rotamers, CABLAM,
etc..).
Note, a geometry outlier
Dear all,
I have two questions. I would like to find out the community consensus of (1)
best practices in refining against lower resolution data (~4 angstrom) to
achieve the best model, and also (2) what manuscript referees should ask for in
this regard. One might encounter a hypothetical
It would be nice to be able to run zero cycles of refmac to get a map
etc direct from a PDB file.
However due the PDB requiring the TLS component of B factor to be
included this does not work.
Is there software to remove the TLS component so a zero cycle of refmac
can be run.
Best wishes
TLSANL?
Eleanor
On 8 March 2017 at 14:08, Nicholas Keep wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to run zero cycles of refmac to get a map etc
> direct from a PDB file.
>
> However due the PDB requiring the TLS component of B factor to be included
> this does not work.
12 matches
Mail list logo