This chart: http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_11761.html
combined with the CCP4 wiki's advice (that the card should say
"stereo" under display connectors) imply that we need to spend
at least $760 on the video card alone.
Is that really true??? EEK!!
Not nesessarily.
Most GeForce cards can be s
Ethan,
> If you think $700 for a computer video card is too much, think about adding
> that incremental cost to every DVD player sold.
But that's missing the point. IF there emerges mass-market demand for Stereo
3D, then it's a safe bet the per-unit cost will end up being negligible since
t
> This chart: http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_11761.html
> combined with the CCP4 wiki's advice (that the card should say
> "stereo" under display connectors) imply that we need to spend
> at least $760 on the video card alone.
> Is that really true??? EEK!!
Uhhh no you don't. The Quadro FX 1400
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Warren DeLano wrote:
> Along those lines, did anyone see "Up" in Stereo 3D? Does stereo 3D enhance
> the experience enough for this to strike you as more than just a passing fad?
> The future (cost) of stereo 3D molecular visualization may well lie in the
> response o
Phoebe,
Donning my "business hat" for a moment, I believe CRT-based stereo 3D has now
evolved into an extreme low-volume market with highly inelastic demand and
little credible competition (ATI's Linux drivers fail on traditional "immediate
mode" OpenGL code used in most molecular viewer). In
Sorry, still need help with this well-trodden territory:
We're badly in need of a new linux PC with stereo and I'm
confused about graphics cards.
We want to recycle the CRT monitor, NuVision emitter and
glasses from an old increasingly unstable machine.
This chart: http://www.nvidia.com/object/
Mark your calendars for and plan a family holiday around the
13th International Conference on the Crystallisation of Biological
Macromolecules
Trinity College Dublin
Ireland
September 12 - 16, 2010
Crystallisation Workshop: September 10 - 11, 2010
The 13th International Confere
