Am 20:59, schrieb Harry Powell:
...
I think there may be issues with collecting data too finely with a
Pilatus, even in shutterless mode. I don't know where the problems arise
(can't be shutter/rotation axis synchronisation), but it seems to be the
normal thing in XDS (which should have no
Hi All
Both Martin and Kay ( in a later message) have misinterpreted what I
wrote - what I meant was that it seems normal in using XDS with
Pilatus data, not the normal thing to do with data from other detectors.
I had found a number of scripts on the web that deal specifically
with
Dear Ronnie,
we are working with weak diffracting crystals. Many tests (and taking
into account Marcus Muellers results) showed that 0.3-0.5 of XDS
mosaicity, (very) low dose, and high redundancy give the best results.
Our crystals diffract between 7 and 4 A. At low dose I do not check
Dear All,
first of all, I would like to thank the many
good people who have responded to my query.
Yet another truly interesting discussion on this BB!
As a partial summary, two points:
1. Few people suggested that our high Rmerge problem
could be caused by experimental troubles
like phi angle
Am 20:59, schrieb Sergei Strelkov:
...
I still tend to think that the best proof would be in the pudding,
i.e. trying to pool thin frames into thicker frames
(but I do not have an immediate means of doing this... )
Sergei,
try to locate 2pck and 2pck.man which were part of former XDS
