Re: [ccp4bb] Protein aggregation and crystallization

2011-08-27 Thread Zheng Zhou
Hi, Anita

If you could find a way to test the elute's activity/binding to its'
substrat/cofactor, then you will learn much more about your target. If the
function assay is elusive, you could try superose column (5KDa-5MKDa). Does
your light scattering tell you about the estimated size and MW?

Best,

Joe

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:29 AM, anita p  wrote:

> Hi Yury,
> I have done dynamic light scattering and it shows its polydispersed.
> Please let me know if it is still ok for setting trays.
> reg.
> anita
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Yuriy Patskovsky <
> yuriy.patskov...@einstein.yu.edu> wrote:
>
>>  Anita,
>> an assembly may be quite large - I would check it somehow, maybe by light
>> scattering or centrifugation
>>
>> Good luck
>>
>> Yury
>>  --
>> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of anita p
>> [crystals...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2011 3:03 AM
>> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Protein aggregation and crystallization
>>
>>  Hi All,
>>  I am working on a protein which has a membrane spanning region and as
>> cytosolic domain.I have  made various deletion constructs of the protein, so
>> that I can have a crystallizable fragment.  There is no homologues mentioned
>> in the pdb for this protein.
>> All of these constructs are purified successfully but when concentrated
>> and loaded on a gel filtration column Superdex-200, they elute in the void
>> volume.  But the proteins donot precipitate out !!
>> Is it worth while to go ahead for crystallization trials??
>> Any other suggestion is most welcome.
>> Thanks
>> Anita
>>
>>
>


Re: [ccp4bb] Methods for dehydrating crystals

2011-08-27 Thread Savvas Savvides
Dear Andrea
check out:
Post-crystallization treatments for improving diffraction quality of protein 
crystals.
Heras B, Martin JL.
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005 Sep;61(Pt 9):1173-80.

All the best
Savvas

On 26 Aug 2011, at 22:53, Andrea L Edwards wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> What are the most successful methods you know of for dehydrating a crystal 
> prior to freezing it? I am trying to push the resolution of my crystals.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrea



Re: [ccp4bb] Detergents to eliminate non specific aggregations

2011-08-27 Thread Michael Thompson
Hampton makes a "Detergent Screen" that works the same way as the Additive 
Screen. 

http://hamptonresearch.com/product_detail.aspx?cid=1&sid=39&pid=31

It has 96 unique detergent reagents for crystal screening. 

It is a bit expensive, but if you don't want to purchase the whole kit you 
could just download the formulation table and then you will have a nice long 
list of possibilities.

Mike


- Original Message -
From: "商元" 
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:55:27 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [ccp4bb] Detergents to eliminate non specific aggregations

Hi, everyone, 
I can get my protein complex but there are some non-specific aggregation from 
the NMR spectra, and chaps can improve it. 
So, besides chaps, is there any other detergents to be used during crystal 
screening? All suggestions are welcome. 

Thanks&Regards, 
Yuan 

-- 
Michael C. Thompson

Graduate Student

Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Division

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry

University of California, Los Angeles

mi...@chem.ucla.edu


Re: [ccp4bb] reindexing monoclinic data

2011-08-27 Thread Edward A. Berry

Sorry for adding confusion- of course in reciprocal space beta* should be
acute. The figures should have been labeled a, c not h,L.

Edward A. Berry wrote:

Gregory Bowman wrote:

Yes, but I don't actually want to swap a and c (convention that a is shorter 
than c),
but instead flip k and keep h and l the same. Incidentally, it is not 
immediately
obvious to me why in matrix I cited below that the new l is h+l:
-1 0 0
0 -1 0
1 0 1

Greg


Because -a and c would give acute beta angle, by convention should be obtuse?




Re: [ccp4bb] reindexing monoclinic data

2011-08-27 Thread Edward A. Berry

Gregory Bowman wrote:

Yes, but I don't actually want to swap a and c (convention that a is shorter 
than c), but instead flip k and keep h and l the same. Incidentally, it is not 
immediately obvious to me why in matrix I cited below that the new l is h+l:
-1 0 0
0 -1 0
1 0 1

Greg


Because -a and c would give acute beta angle, by convention should be obtuse?


<>

[ccp4bb] Detergents to eliminate non specific aggregations

2011-08-27 Thread 商元
Hi, everyone,
   I can get my protein complex but there are some non-specific aggregation
from the NMR spectra, and chaps can improve it.
So, besides chaps, is there any other detergents to be used during crystal
screening? All suggestions are welcome.

Thanks&Regards,
Yuan