[ccp4bb] alpha lactose in COOT

2012-11-19 Thread Rex Palmer
Does anyone know why the ligand alpha lactose in COOT has at least one sugar 
ring that is not fully symmetrical. The CCDC deposited alpha lactose molecule 
has both rings perfectly symmetrical chairs.


Rex Palmer
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/biology/our-staff/emeritus-staff
http://rexpalmer2010.homestead.com

Re: [ccp4bb] Temperature and crystallization

2012-11-19 Thread Emmanuel Saridakis
Dear Acoot,

In the website of the company Centeo, you can find the slides of a short 
presentation I had given three years ago on temperature and macromolecular 
crystalllisation. You may find some info there:

http://www.centeo.com/_fileupload/Temperature%20Control%20in%20PXTL.pdf

There is a lot more on the centeo.com site.

Best,

Emmanuel Saridakis

  - Original Message - 
  From: Acoot Brett 
  To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK 
  Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 7:08 AM
  Subject: [ccp4bb] Temperature and crystallization


Dear All,

Will you please give a comment on how the temperature influences on the 
possibility to get protein crystal, and how the temperatures used to get the 
protein crystals of the same protein influences the protein 3-D structures of 
the same protein got based on the crystals of the same protein got at different 
temperatures?

Cheers,

Acoot


   


Re: [ccp4bb] hkl2000 install

2012-11-19 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Rui Wang,

the window size of the main HKL2000 window is indeed fixed. One
relatively simple workaround is  to use a virtual screen size,
provided you use X11.  Check your  /etc/X11/xorg.conf and add an
entry, say, 'Virtual 1400 1024' in the Display Section and restart X -
this way, as you hit the lower border of your monitor with the mouse
pointer, to scroll down and see the lower parts of the HKL2000 window.

Best,
Tim

On 11/19/2012 02:48 AM, 王瑞 wrote:
 OK,thank you all of you. I have installed one copy of HKL2000 on
 our desktop computer. But for my notebook's low 1366*768
 resolution, the HKL2000 can't work ! So what could I do to resolve
 it ?
 
 2012/11/13 王瑞 wangrui...@gmail.com:
 Dear everyone:
 
 I have got the returned cr_info.dat to /usr/local/lib and 
 /usr/local/hklint,when I typing HKL2000,it still display:
 
 dell@ubuntu:~$ HKL2000 ERROR: Not a valid HKL-2000 license:
 Licence info file (cr_info) not found Error code: -1
 
 So could anyone can help me ?
 
 2012/11/9 王瑞 wangrui...@gmail.com:
 Dear everyone:
 
 I'm sorry for a little off-topic! I want to install HKL2000 on 
 ubuntu11.10 32bits, but it produces a file named info not
 cr_info after  run the access_prod program.And when I put
 info to
 
 /usr/local/lib directory and typingHKL2000 in terminal, it
 display: root@ubuntu:/usr/local/bin# HKL2000 ERROR: Not a valid
 HKL-2000 license: Licence info file (cr_info) not found Error
 code: -1
 
 So could anyone tell me how to do it ?
 
 Rui Wang
 

- -- 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFQqgwaUxlJ7aRr7hoRAg3iAKDjrjBi1cpR07bszLOaZDMpHpBjmwCeI8i7
CcqbmAGU8rVWn7qqFJHo67w=
=6s1F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] CONECT Records

2012-11-19 Thread Jenny Harmer
Thank you for the information. They are only coordination bonds between the 
atoms, which I wouldn't personally class as a physical bond. 

I am also using WinCoot which does not have the option for Make Link under the 
Modelling tab in Extensions. Is this a function of the Linux version?


[ccp4bb] coot, shelx res files and R32 (H32)

2012-11-19 Thread Petr Leiman
Dear Developers of Coot,

I believe that coot has never been able to display the crystallographic 
symmetry of a R32:H shelxl .res file. As a result, water picking does not work 
properly for such a file. Everything else seems to work fine. This is not a 
huge problem, but it would be nice to be able to see symmetry atoms without 
loading the corresponding shelxl .pdb (which accidentally lacks the space group 
information anyway, so it has to be edited prior to loading). Again, not a big 
problem but I believe it is an easy fix in the code, so hopefully this will be 
done at some point in the future.

Thank you,

Petr


Petr Leiman
EPFL
BSP-415
CH-1015 Lausanne
Switzerland


Re: [ccp4bb] coot, shelx res files and R32 (H32)

2012-11-19 Thread George Sheldrick
shelxl-2012 does include the space group in a way that Coot understands 
when it writes a .pdb file. This version is in the final beta-testing 
stage with a lot of new features (mainly for small molecules) and no 
known bugs, so I hope to release it soon. If anyone would like to try it 
now please send me an email.


George

On 11/19/2012 02:13 PM, Petr Leiman wrote:

Dear Developers of Coot,

I believe that coot has never been able to display the crystallographic 
symmetry of a R32:H shelxl .res file. As a result, water picking does not work 
properly for such a file. Everything else seems to work fine. This is not a 
huge problem, but it would be nice to be able to see symmetry atoms without 
loading the corresponding shelxl .pdb (which accidentally lacks the space group 
information anyway, so it has to be edited prior to loading). Again, not a big 
problem but I believe it is an easy fix in the code, so hopefully this will be 
done at some point in the future.

Thank you,

Petr


Petr Leiman
EPFL
BSP-415
CH-1015 Lausanne
Switzerland




--
Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-22582


Re: [ccp4bb] hkl2000 install

2012-11-19 Thread David Schuller
On 11/18/12 20:48, 王瑞 wrote:
 OK,thank you all of you. I have installed one copy of HKL2000 on our
 desktop computer. But for my notebook's low 1366*768 resolution, the
 HKL2000 can't work ! So what could I do to resolve it ?

http://www.pcworld.com/article/261763/samsung_shows_off_series_9_laptop_with_retina_matching_display.html

Samsung Shows Off Series 9 Laptop With Retina-Matching Display

2560 x 1440 pixels in a 13 inch laptop


-- 
===
All Things Serve the Beam
===
   David J. Schuller
   modern man in a post-modern world
   MacCHESS, Cornell University
   schul...@cornell.edu


Re: [ccp4bb] coot, shelx res files and R32 (H32)

2012-11-19 Thread Petr Leiman
Dear George,

Thank you very much for your continuing development of the shelx suite. A lot 
of users (yours truly included) are happy to continue using .res files in coot. 
It's just the stupid R32/H32 spacegroup that causes coot to misbehave a 
little. And I am simply very surprised of why this bug has survived so many 
revisions of coot.

Thank you,

Petr 
 
On Nov 19, 2012, at 2:33 PM, George Sheldrick wrote:

 shelxl-2012 does include the space group in a way that Coot understands when 
 it writes a .pdb file. This version is in the final beta-testing stage with a 
 lot of new features (mainly for small molecules) and no known bugs, so I hope 
 to release it soon. If anyone would like to try it now please send me an 
 email.
 
 George
 
 On 11/19/2012 02:13 PM, Petr Leiman wrote:
 Dear Developers of Coot,
 
 I believe that coot has never been able to display the crystallographic 
 symmetry of a R32:H shelxl .res file. As a result, water picking does not 
 work properly for such a file. Everything else seems to work fine. This is 
 not a huge problem, but it would be nice to be able to see symmetry atoms 
 without loading the corresponding shelxl .pdb (which accidentally lacks the 
 space group information anyway, so it has to be edited prior to loading). 
 Again, not a big problem but I believe it is an easy fix in the code, so 
 hopefully this will be done at some point in the future.
 
 Thank you,
 
 Petr
 
 
 Petr Leiman
 EPFL
 BSP-415
 CH-1015 Lausanne
 Switzerland
 
 
 
 -- 
 Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
 Dept. Structural Chemistry,
 University of Goettingen,
 Tammannstr. 4,
 D37077 Goettingen, Germany
 Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
 Fax. +49-551-39-22582


[ccp4bb] Macromolecular Crystallography Beamline Scientist Position at NSLS-II

2012-11-19 Thread Miller, Lisa M
Beamline Scientist Position for Macromolecular Crystallography Beamlines at 
NSLS-II

The Photon Sciences Directorate at Brookhaven National Laboratory is seeking an 
experienced scientist to support the development of a Microfocusing 
Macromolecular Crystallography Beamline (FMX) and a Highly Automated 
Macromolecular Crystallography Beamline (AMX) at the National Synchrotron Light 
Source II (NSLS-II), which is a new 3rd-generation synchrotron facility being 
constructed on Long Island, New York, with extremely high brightness and 
exceptional beam stability over a wide spectral range.

As a scientific staff member reporting to the Group Leader for the FMX/ AMX 
beamlines in the Photon Division, the selected candidate will be part of a 
group of scientific and engineering staff to design and build a pair of 
state-of-the-art macromolecular crystallography beamlines and its associated 
scientific programs at NSLS-II. Responsibilities include interacting with the 
scientific user community to define the mission and technical scope of the 
beamlines, and supporting all aspects of the beamline design, construction, 
commissioning, and operations.

Qualifications Required:
*   Ph.D. in structural biology, physics, biophysics, or a related field
*   At least two (2) years of post-doctoral experience in macromolecular 
crystallography at a synchrotron beamline
*   Experience in synchrotron-based research is required in one of three 
scientific areas: (1) high throughput macromolecular crystallography, (2) 
design and development of crystallography instrumentation and methods, or (3) 
operation of a macromolecular crystallography user program at a synchrotron
*   Excellent written and oral communications skills
*   The ability to interact effectively in a team environment with a 
diverse group of scientists, engineers, technical staff, and users.

Qualifications Preferred:
*   Experience with experimental investigations at the micro- or nano scale
*   Experience in process automation and remote control
*   Experience with crystallographic data analysis and structure solving
*   Experience in the design and analysis of optical components
*   Prior experience in project planning, execution, and reporting.

The selected candidate will be placed at the appropriate scientific level 
dependent upon depth and breadth of relevant knowledge and skills he or she 
brings to the position, as well as the amount of relevant experience.

For more information, go to http://www.bnl.gov/HR/careers/ and see Job ID# 
16236 or contact Dieter Schneider at schnei...@bnl.govmailto:schnei...@bnl.gov

Deadline for applications is November 27, 2012.





Re: [ccp4bb] coot, shelx res files and R32 (H32)

2012-11-19 Thread Paul Emsley

On 19/11/12 13:13, Petr Leiman wrote:

Dear Developers of Coot,

I believe that coot has never been able to display the crystallographic 
symmetry of a R32:H shelxl .res file. As a result, water picking does not work 
properly for such a file. Everything else seems to work fine. This is not a 
huge problem, but it would be nice to be able to see symmetry atoms without 
loading the corresponding shelxl .pdb (which accidentally lacks the space group 
information anyway, so it has to be edited prior to loading). Again, not a big 
problem but I believe it is an easy fix in the code, so hopefully this will be 
done at some point in the future.




And I am simply very surprised of why this bug has survived so many revisions 
of coot.



Yes, it it old code. I did not know about this issue (or forgot about it 
- that's not impossible).


Yes, it seems not too hard to fix.

Paul.


Re: [ccp4bb] CONECT Records

2012-11-19 Thread Paul Emsley

On 19/11/12 11:12, Jenny Harmer wrote:

Thank you for the information. They are only coordination bonds between the 
atoms, which I wouldn't personally class as a physical bond.

I am also using WinCoot which does not have the option for Make Link under the 
Modelling tab in Extensions. Is this a function of the Linux version?


Are we talking 0.7?

Paul.


[ccp4bb] Off-topic: heterologous co-expression in yeast

2012-11-19 Thread Andre Luis Berteli Ambrosio
Hi,
We have been thinking of implementing recombinant protein expression in S. 
cerevisiae in our lab, and I would like to ask if there is a choice of vector 
designed for co-expression of any two intracellular binding partners, similarly 
to the pETduet-1 vector for E. coli.
If you feel this is not of broad interest, please reply directly to me.
I thank you for your input,

 Andre LB Ambrosio
Laboratório Nacional de Biociências - LNBio
CNPEM, Brazil



Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: heterologous co-expression in yeast

2012-11-19 Thread Pascal Egea
Hi Andre,

There is set of plasmids allowing coexpression in yeast
they are described in the following article

Constructionand characterization of bidirectional expression

vectors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Aimin Li1,2, Zengshan Liu1, Qianxue Li2, Lu Yu1, Dacheng Wang2  Xuming Deng
1,2


in FEMS Yeast Res 8 (2008) 6–9 !c


Those plasmids are designed for coexpression and use two different
promoters a constitutive one (GPD) and a strong inducible one (GAL). You
have several selection markers and they are shuttle vectors for easy
manipulation and amplification in E. coli.


Hope this helps.


Best of luck



-- 
Pascal F. Egea, PhD
Assistant Professor
UCLA, David Geffen School of Medicine
Department of Biological Chemistry
Boyer Hall room 356
611 Charles E Young Drive East
Los Angeles CA 90095
office (310)-983-3515
lab  (310)-983-3516
email pe...@mednet.ucla.edu


Re: [ccp4bb] OT: Has anyone experienced problems with Apple laptop battery expansion?

2012-11-19 Thread Engin Özkan
To add another datapoint, a couple of weeks ago, I saw a friend's 
MacBook Pro (probably 2007) had a battery case open up just like that. 
My 17-inch MacBook Pro (2008) case is also bent in a million different 
ways, and I have already had to change the bottom case once (for $130, 
and at no labor cost, since they were also changing the fried-up video 
card which was recalled), as the laptop would not even close. The top 
case is also coming apart, but replacing that is not an option 
apparently, since it practically comes with the display. I change my 
battery frequently enough that, I guess my battery does not go up in flames.


I have always thought that the unibody design was Apple addressing these 
issues, but seeing what happened to those MacBook Airs just depresses me.


Engin

On 11/19/2012 10:37 AM, Charles Pemble wrote:

Hey Bill,

I have had this happen on two separate occasions with old macbook body 
style.  The first (2008) resulted in Apple replacing the battery for 
free without any hassle.  The second time (2010) was significantly 
worse (see attached pic) – Apple said, That's normal wear and tear. 
 After much debate about this being normal, the guy at the Genius 
bar suggested my only option was to purchase a new one.



Cheers,

Charlie
_
Charles W. Pemble IV, Ph.D.
Facility Manager, Duke Medical School Crystallography
Research Scientist, DHVI
Duke University
308 Research Drive
LSRC, A06
Durham, NC 27708
charles.pem...@duke.edu mailto:charles.pem...@duke.edu


On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, William G. Scott wgsc...@ucsc.edu 
mailto:wgsc...@ucsc.edu wrote:


Hi folks:

I'm trying to get a sense for how frequently this sort of thing
occurs:


That was a macbook air that served me well for four years, but
then self-destructed. (I took it to the Apple store.  They
generously offered to repair it for $800 or to sell me a new one,
and suggested this was normal if you leave the power cord attached
after the battery charges, even while giving a lecture or
seminar.)  It strikes me as a bit dangerous.

--Bill Scott





William G. Scott
Professor
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
and The Center for the Molecular Biology of RNA
228 Sinsheimer Laboratories
University of California at Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz, California 95064
USA






--






Re: [ccp4bb] coot, shelx res files and R32 (H32)

2012-11-19 Thread Paul Emsley

Hi Petr,

Thanks for noting this - yes it has existed for a while, sad to say.

(I was using the standard space group name to convert between clipper 
symmetry and mmdb symmetry - that was a mistake - I should have been 
using the Extended Hermann–Mauguin symbols).


Fixed in r4489.

Paul.


On 19/11/12 14:17, Petr Leiman wrote:

Dear George,

Thank you very much for your continuing development of the shelx suite. A lot of users 
(yours truly included) are happy to continue using .res files in coot. It's just the 
stupid R32/H32 spacegroup that causes coot to misbehave a little. And I am 
simply very surprised of why this bug has survived so many revisions of coot.

Thank you,

Petr
  
On Nov 19, 2012, at 2:33 PM, George Sheldrick wrote:



shelxl-2012 does include the space group in a way that Coot understands when it 
writes a .pdb file. This version is in the final beta-testing stage with a lot 
of new features (mainly for small molecules) and no known bugs, so I hope to 
release it soon. If anyone would like to try it now please send me an email.

George

On 11/19/2012 02:13 PM, Petr Leiman wrote:

Dear Developers of Coot,

I believe that coot has never been able to display the crystallographic 
symmetry of a R32:H shelxl .res file. As a result, water picking does not work 
properly for such a file. Everything else seems to work fine. This is not a 
huge problem, but it would be nice to be able to see symmetry atoms without 
loading the corresponding shelxl .pdb (which accidentally lacks the space group 
information anyway, so it has to be edited prior to loading). Again, not a big 
problem but I believe it is an easy fix in the code, so hopefully this will be 
done at some point in the future.



[ccp4bb] ctruncate/scapepacktomtz : terminate called after throwing an instance of clipper::Message_fatal

2012-11-19 Thread hari jayaram
Hi All,
I am running the latest ccp4 ( auto-updated using the new autoupdate tool
built into ccp4i)

I was running what should be a routine scalepack to mtz conversion and I
got an error which I have never seen before with ctruncate.


When I run the same job with old truncate it succeeds.


Any ideas what may be causing this. I hope I snipped the correct part of
the error message.


Thanks
Hari



***
* Information from CCP4Interface script
***
The program run with command:
/home/hari/ccp4-6.3-download/ccp4-6.3.0/bin/ctruncate -hklin
/tmp/hari/B8-C7-A_P21_4_1_mtz.tmp -hklout
/tmp/hari/B8-C7-A_P21_4_3_mtz.tmp -colin /*/*/\[IMEAN,SIGIMEAN\]
-colano /*/*/\[I(+),SIGI(+),I(-),SIGI(-)\] -colout B8-C7-A_P21 -nres 150
has failed with error message
CCP4MTZfile - internal error
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'clipper::Message_fatal'
***


#CCP4I TERMINATION STATUS 0 CCP4MTZfile - internal error terminate called
after throwing an instance of 'clipper::Message_fatal'
#CCP4I TERMINATION TIME 19 Nov 2012  16:50:26
#CCP4I MESSAGE Task failed


[ccp4bb] occupancy vs. Bfactors

2012-11-19 Thread GRANT MILLS
Hello all,

I'm currently working on a structure which if I stub a certain side chain 
phenix/coot shows me a large green blob which looks strikingly similar to the 
side chain, when I put it in and run another refinement the blob turns red.

Basically I was just playing around and I changed the occupancy of the side 
chain and now there are no complaints. But I was thinking, should I haven 
changed the Bfactors instead? Should I have left well enough alone? If I lower 
the occupancy manually and do not include alternate confirmations have I 
introduced modelling bias?

Could someone recommend some good articles I could read on exactly how to 
correctly fix this problem.

Thanks,
GM


Re: [ccp4bb] occupancy vs. Bfactors

2012-11-19 Thread Pavel Afonine
Hi Grant,

sounds like you did the right thing (as far as I can guess given the amount
of information you provided).

In a nutshell, both, B-factors and occupancies, model disorder. The
difference is that occupancies model larger scale disorder (such as
distinct conformations) than B-factors (smearing due to temperature
vibrations, etc).

Perhaps in you case the side chain has several conformations among which
you can see only one, and therefore it's valid to model it with occupancy
less than 1 (I presume you refined one occupancy per all atoms in that side
chain).

Pavel

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:36 PM, GRANT MILLS 
gdmi...@students.latrobe.edu.au wrote:

  Hello all,

 I'm currently working on a structure which if I stub a certain side chain
 phenix/coot shows me a large green blob which looks strikingly similar to
 the side chain, when I put it in and run another refinement the blob turns
 red.

 Basically I was just playing around and I changed the occupancy of the
 side chain and now there are no complaints. But I was thinking, should I
 haven changed the Bfactors instead? Should I have left well enough alone?
 If I lower the occupancy manually and do not include alternate
 confirmations have I introduced modelling bias?

 Could someone recommend some good articles I could read on exactly how to
 correctly fix this problem.

 Thanks,
 GM



Re: [ccp4bb] occupancy vs. Bfactors

2012-11-19 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Grant,

This is part of the recurring side chain discussion. There is no consensus in 
the community about what the optimal approach is.
In your current approach you are adding a model parameter (occupancy) to 
improve the fit with the experimental data (remove negative difference 
density). You should ask yourself whether you really need to add that 
parameter. Are you not overfitting? Is there any clear evidence that the atoms 
are not always there?
The alternative model you propose (full occupancy, high B) has fewer parameters 
and explains more of the strucure (you account for all atoms the protein has, 
prior knowledge). This model probably also better reflects the uncertainty of 
the coordinates of the side chains involved. If your B-factor restraints are 
not too tight, the difference densitty should also disappear (equal explanation 
of the experimental data). To me that would be a better model.

HTH,
Robbie

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:36:56 +
From: gdmi...@students.latrobe.edu.au
Subject: [ccp4bb] occupancy vs. Bfactors
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK







Hello all,



I'm currently working on a structure which if I stub a certain side chain 
phenix/coot shows me a large green blob which looks strikingly similar to the 
side chain, when I put it in and run another refinement the blob turns red.



Basically I was just playing around and I changed the occupancy of the side 
chain and now there are no complaints. But I was thinking, should I haven 
changed the Bfactors instead? Should I have left well enough alone? If I lower 
the occupancy manually and do
 not include alternate confirmations have I introduced modelling bias?



Could someone recommend some good articles I could read on exactly how to 
correctly fix this problem.



Thanks,

GM