Re: [ccp4bb] Does ncs bias R-free? And if so, can it be avoided by special selection of the free set?

2019-06-01 Thread Jonathan Cooper
I have done some more tests with different programs for choosing the R-free set in shells or at random and the results are at the same link: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhajc0/rfreetests.pdf There still seems to be no significant difference between the normal R-free and the R-free in shells, with

Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimensions

2019-06-01 Thread Jonathan Cooper
Does the SAXS model contain more than one subunit? If so, I would be tempted to go back to the model and try each one separately. This may not apply, but if there are monomers in the SAXS model that are related by space group symmetry in the crystal, I think the MR would never work. Good luck

Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimensions

2019-06-01 Thread Jrh Gmail
Dear Kevin You could try reindexing into P1, then run Phaser and with its solution as input to Zanuda determine the space group. Best wishes, John Emeritus Professor of Chemistry John R Helliwell DSc_Physics > On 31 May 2019, at 21:09, Kevin Jude wrote: > > Hello community, I wonder if

Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimensions

2019-06-01 Thread Kevin Jude
Thanks Diana - Indexing on strong reflections (STRONG_PIXEL=50 in xds) does identify C222 as a possibility with the same dimensions as the P222 cell. This doesn't solve my problem, though, since the centering operation just replaces the tNCS and doesn't relieve the crowding. Best wishes Kevin --