Ta
Now dear
My deadline for this grant is on the second
I will try to get a rewritten simplified version to you before tomorrow morning.
When I do PLEASE look it over and see if you can write in anything else wrt
modelling - at present its not written in year 1
Also general check and approval
Hi,
also agreed, but actually doing it proved a lot more tricky than I
initially thought.
For my last structure, which was very anisotropic, I deposited a mmcif
containing 1/ the originial data, 2/the truncated data and 3/ the map.
It proved impossible to create this file with the tools at
Also agree, see http://staraniso.globalphasing.org/deposition_about.html .
Cheers
-- Ian
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 15:58, Robbie Joosten
wrote:
> I fully agree. Unfortunately, not everyone does that so cases like I
> described will keep appearing.
>
> Cheers,
> Robbie
>
> On 30 May 2020 16:40,
I fully agree. Unfortunately, not everyone does that so cases like I described will keep appearing. Cheers,RobbieOn 30 May 2020 16:40, Eleanor Dodson wrote:My pennysworth. If you find your maps look better after the anisotroy correction use it, but it may be helpful to those wo want to mine your
My pennysworth. If you find your maps look better after the
anisotroy correction use it, but it may be helpful to those wo want to mine
your data if you deposit the whole sphere..
eleanor
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 09:36, Robbie Joosten
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been looking at some recent PDB
>>> Ian Tickle 05/30/20 7:14 AM >>>
>>(unless of course the completeness calculations were performed on two
different reflection files)?
EDS is in fact using a different dataset compared to the coordinates,
when I submit the output reflections.cif produced by phenix, when the
input I, sigma-I
Hi Ian,
> I don't see that anisotropic truncation has anything to do with the low
> spherical completeness as compared with the info in the co-ordinate file.
> Yes the spherical completeness after anisotropic truncation will be reduced,
> but why would it cause it to become inconsistent with that
Hi Robbie
I don't see that anisotropic truncation has anything to do with the low
spherical completeness as compared with the info in the co-ordinate file.
Yes the spherical completeness after anisotropic truncation will be
reduced, but why would it cause it to become inconsistent with that
Dear Bernand,
In MAIN embedded map algebra can probably vover all what you need. If you want
to go along this path, please, let me know and I will help you.
best,
dusan
> On 30 May 2020, at 01:00, CCP4BB automatic digest system
> wrote:
>
>
> Date:Fri, 29 May 2020 00:02:11 -0700
>
Hi Everyone,
I've been looking at some recent PDB entries that have much lower spherical)
completeness than reported in the coordinate file. One reason for this is that
the data were anisotropicly truncated, another reason is some mess-up with the
deposition of the reflection data. There is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
