Dear Cristina,
In CCP4 you've got two options that use the modern approach (Acedrg):
(1) CCP4i2 -> Ligands -> Make Covalent Link.
(2) Coot -> Calculate -> Modules -> CCP4. This will make a "CCP4" menu appear
that contains the option: Make Link via Acedrg.
Hopefully it's pretty
You can create a link in COOT..
Eleanor
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Cristina Machon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am writing regarding a problem we are facing with the refinement of a
> structure. We would really appreciate it if anybody could suggest how to
> set up geometrical restraints for a
To add: I think what Dr. Garman means by "match" is not necessarily to
set the two flow rates to the same value. The optimal settings will
depend on the size, shape, and even orientation of your nozzle. You
need to fiddle with the outer stream flow rate to find the one that
minimizes the
Hi David,
you are right, the M in MPR is just a count of “whatever” is averaged to get
the final intensities.
However, from this “inexhaustible thread” it is also clear that there will be
no agreement on what to call this “whatever”
Best, Herman
Von: David Waterman
Gesendet: Freitag, 3.
We routinely use NoMachine NX or X2Go to share the desktop for remote
data collection. And recently I have personally collected data using
such while simultaneously running a Zoom window for communication.
Internet speed to my home is about 100 Mbps download, 11 Mbps upload. A
few notes:
If
Dear Herman and David,
This thread seems inexhaustible :-) .
On the matter of "measurement" vs. "observation", we seem again to be
in a situation described by the British idiom "half of one and half-a-dozen"
of the other, i.e. distinct but synonymous terms between which a choice is
Dear Colleagues,
Now that Herman has announced a quietude I thought you might enjoy this quite
short report on a synchrotron radiation issue that came up some years back via
the JSR Main Editors into the IUCr Nomenclature Committee, chaired by Andre
Authier, Past President of the IUCr:-
Hi Herman,
I started googling and ended up completely lost down a rabbit hole (have a
look here if you want to see what I mean:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/measurement-science/). As a result I'm
no longer sure I know what the word "measurement" means! I tried to
simplify things with a
Dear David,
Thank you for your reaction. It has become clear to me that although most
people understand what I intended with “measurement”, in practice it is very
much in the eye of the beholder. It was suggested in the BB to use observation
instead, but I am fairly sure that some people will
I should say I also saw flashing during screen share in a Zoom call. This
might also be because only a single window was shared, and this window
overlaid another on the speaker's desktop. I saw flickering glimpses of the
Word document underneath the window the speaker was trying to share.
--
Yes, if you don’t match the inner and outer stream rates you get turbulent flow
at the boundary between them and ice build up on the sample.
Best wishes
Elspeth
From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Marcus Winter
Sent: 03 July 2020 09:29
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] flow rate
Hi James,
At your offline suggestion I tried this myself and observe the same fit
inducing flashing - however when I shared the desktop (which had a full-screen
NX session running) it worked fine
The performance seems good enough to be able to follow along with data
collection at the very
Dear Ian,
I stand corrected: I should have realized before writing rather than
afterwards that you were surely stressing the formalization (or
formalisation) part.
Cheers,
Navdeep
---
On 02.07.20 22:09, Ian Tickle wrote:
>
> Hi Navdeep
>
> Yes good point, the principle of redundancy (though
Hi Herman,
I like the idea of MPR, but I continue to worry about the term
"measurement". The intensity associated with a particular reflection is a
fit based on a scaling model, and ultimately, depending on your integration
software, may be linked to a weighted sum of two raw measurements: the
Hi all,
I have had problems trying to share my screen using Teams when using the NX
client. I have experienced the screen flashing in a manner which may induce
fits! This may be related to sharing a window rather than the whole desktop but
something to be aware of. I have taken to using Zoom
Thanks Ian - I think you raise some excellent points - while I think the
general reader (TM) would understand that redundancy and multiplicity mean
broadly the same thing in Table 1, I think having program developers document
_precisely_ what they mean by those values would be very valuable. I
Hi Nick
I’ll offer a vote in favour of teams, as it is possible with the desktop
application to hand over control as well for a shared window (e.g. NX) so your
student could perform the collection themselves under your supervision rather
than just watching.
I’ve not tried teams + NX as a
Dear Patrick, Herman,
Regarding the Cryostream, then referring to the Cryostream 800 brochure
indicates that the N2 (gas) flow rates employed are in the range of 5 - 10
litres / minute, … and, I guess, therefore something similar for the outer dry
air 'shield' stream. Obviously, it’s
We are going to be doing a data collection for an MRes student at
Diamond in the next couple of weeks. These are his first crystals. It
would be good if he could be involved in watching it.
I was wondering if anyone had tried sharing screen and voice via moodle
collaborate or Microsoft
Dear Ian,
Since some very advanced countries still use miles, Fahrenheit and inches, I
did not expect anything to change. It was an escalating discussion in this
thread on data completeness(!) on the use of multiplicity vs redundancy that
made me suggest a different term. Except for an
Dear Patrick,
if I recall correctly, our systems run at 10-15 ml/min (gas). I will check on
Monday when I am back in the lab.
The original cryostreams would run for several day's on a tank of liquid
nitrogen. However, they had significant hardware to dry the nitrogen and to
ensure a constant
21 matches
Mail list logo
