Re: [ccp4bb] Zalman ZM-M215W and ZM-M240W with coot and pymol

2010-07-15 Thread jbosch
I find the 22 sufficient if run at highest resolution 1680x1050. If you really 
need more space get a second one and run the machine in dual mode. I'm waiting 
for Apple to announce finally the new MacPro's to get one of them. It will be 
connected to a 24 Cinema Display and a 22 Zalman.

Jürgen
-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/

On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Engin Ozkan wrote:

  On 7/13/10 11:05 AM, Daniel Lietha wrote:
 Does anyone know if the ZM-M215W and ZM-M240W Zalman monitors work in 
 3D with Coot and Pymol (would use them on Mac OS10.6)? If so, does the 
 increased resolution improve things compared to the ZM-M220W?
 Thanks,
 Daniel
 Let me bring back to life the thread Daniel started two days ago. Do any 
 of the Zalman monitors related to ZM-M220W work with coot and pymol in 
 stereo mode (for linux)? We are looking for as large a monitor we can 
 buy, and at least one lab member finds it an offense to even consider 
 buying a 22-inch monitor. In the age of huge flat display TVs, it 
 appears that one cannot force others to look at small screens (somehow 
 smartphones are an exception to this).
 
 We can definitely use extra space on the monitor when we have all those 
 pymol, coot, ccp4i and phenix GUIs on, but we also want the stereo 
 option possible for that rare event.
 
 Thanks,
 Engin
 
 -- 
 Engin Özkan
 Post-doctoral Scholar
 Howard Hughes Medical Institute
 Dept of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
 279 Campus Drive, Beckman Center B173
 Stanford School of Medicine
 Stanford, CA 94305
 ph: (650)-498-7111



Re: [ccp4bb] Question about R/Rfree value difference

2010-07-08 Thread jbosch
Something else to consider is what is your space group ?
P212121 but truly P21 with twinning fraction close to 0.5 ?
That's one of my recent cases. 1.9 Å data beautifully refined  built but the 
Rwork/Rfree gap was 13 percent. After changing the space group and applying the 
twin law the gap is 3 percent 18.4 and 21.3

Jürgen

-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/

On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Sampath Natarajan wrote:

 Dear all,
  
 I have a question about the R free value. I refined a structure with 2A 
 resolution. After model building and restraint refinement using Refmac 
 program, the average B factor was around 50 for all atoms. The R/Rfree were 
 around 22/34. Then used the TLS refinement choosing entire molecule. Then 
 R/Rfree reduced as 20/32. But the average B factor was reduced as 30. The 
 R/Rfree difference is about 12% in final refinement. I feel it is 
 significantly higher.
  
 Could any one suggest me to reduce the Rfree value more? or is it good to 
 submit the data in the PDB database with this 12% difference?
  
 Thanks for the suggestions.
  
 Sincerely,
 Sampath N



Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 on iMac

2010-06-16 Thread jbosch
See and follow the rules on this web site:
http://sage.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/xtal/wiki/index.php/Crystallography_on_OS_X

Jürgen

-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry  Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/

On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Hari Namboodiri wrote:

 Hello CCPeers,
 
 I am trying to download CCP4 and Coot on to my new Mac( Mac OSX 10.6.3). On 
 the downloading site, I am seeing couple of files, which are the ones to be 
 downloaded? I tried to download the intel,dmg. But it did not launch ccp4.
 
 
 Are there any other files to be downloaded? Tcl/Tk etc?
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Dipta
 
 
 



Re: [ccp4bb] Characterization of Protein Conformational Changes

2009-01-07 Thread JBosch
You can abuse/mis-use the TLSMD server from Ethan to analyse  domain  
movements and draw your conclusions accordingly, see here http://skuld.bmsc.washington.edu/~tlsmd/


Jürgen
On 7 Jan 2009, at 16:54, Jacob Keller wrote:


Dear Crystallographers,

I am sure that most here have dealt with the issue, when making  
superpositions of conformationally-different structures, of which  
regions to align as references and which to call mobile.  
Conformational changes can range from very local (e.g., unwinding of  
a helix) to very diffuse (e.g., subtle but significant rigid body  
shifts between two domains.) In the first case, it would probably  
make sense to do a global least-squares fitting, but in the latter,  
one would do better to fix one of the domains, and show the shift in  
the other domain. These cases, however, presuppose that one knows  
which type of case one is dealing with. This could be done by  
guesswork and trial-and-error, but does anybody know of an approach  
(e.g., a program) to define the most reasonable way to think about a  
given conformational change? Variable-size sliding-window least- 
squares superpositions with comparisons of local versus global  
rmsd's come to mind, but I do not know whether this has been  
implemented anywhere, and would not know readily how to set the  
parameters thereof either.


Best Regards,

Jacob Keller

***
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
Dallos Laboratory
F. Searle 1-240
2240 Campus Drive
Evanston IL 60208
lab: 847.491.2438
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
***


-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, W8708
615 North Wolfe Street
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742



Re: [ccp4bb] Mac pro

2009-01-06 Thread JBosch

Hi Sheemel,
I assume you are waiting for today's announcements of the i7 core  
MacPro's ? If not wait another 6 hours before deciding to buy something.


Jürgen

On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:27, Sheemei wrote:


Dear all,
	I am thinking of getting a apple Mac pro desktop computer. I was  
wondering does all crystallography programs run on it? I think there  
are Mac OSX version of CCP4, CNS, SHELX etc. But how about programs  
in the Uppsala software factory etc?. Also is it difficult to  
install these programs - are there problems? Is linux still a safer  
choice?


sheemei


-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, W8708
615 North Wolfe Street
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742