On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:42:47AM -0700, Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)
wrote:
Something the developers might be interested in:
The Refmac_5.6.0117 32-bit windows binaries run native on a win64 3-4x
slower than
those from the linux distribution run
Thanks for benchmarking.
If
Hi Bernhard,
Maybe the paranoia-checkers in windows slow everything down
although I did not see any resources overwhelmed...
I wonder whether the windoze refmac binaries can be used through wine in a
GNU/Linux environment. If yes, then you could possibly differentiate
between the
Hi Nat,
one of my colleagues found (on Linux) that the exp() function provided
by g77 was 20-fold slower than the equivalent in the Intel math library.
I do not know whether this has recently been changed, but the license for
icc-produced executables used to be rather restrictive. If I
I do not know whether this has recently been changed, but the license for
icc-produced executables used to be rather restrictive. If I remember
correctly, you were not allowed to distribute the binaries, full stop.
Nicholas, this restriction applies (and has always applied) only to
Intel's
Hi
I suspect that this is more to do with the amount of memory required,
size of arrays etc; refinement will (in general) be more demanding in
terms of these than an integration program like Mosflm. The last time
I compared the Mosflm performance (which was a few years ago),
running the
Hi Ian,
Nicholas, this restriction applies (and has always applied) only to
Intel's 'evaluation' licence
That's right. With a cost of $9,997.00 for a 3-years/2-seats academic
license,
I couldn't have been talking for anything else ... :-)))
All the best,
Nicholas
--
Nicholas
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:59:22PM +0300, Nikolaos Glykos wrote:
Nicholas, this restriction applies (and has always applied) only to
Intel's 'evaluation' licence
That's right. With a cost of $9,997.00 for a 3-years/2-seats academic
license, I couldn't have been talking for anything else ...
That's right. With a cost of $9,997.00 for a 3-years/2-seats academic
license,
I couldn't have been talking for anything else ... :-)))
Hi Nicholas
That sounds like way more than it should be, in fact it sounds like
you've been quoted the cost of the commercial licence and then some!
From
Hi Ian,
That sounds like way more than it should be, in fact it sounds like
you've been quoted the cost of the commercial licence and then some!
From Intel's website the academic licence for icc (Linux/2 seats) is
$570 incl 1 year's support. Renewal of support for subsequent years
will be less
Something the developers might be interested in:
The Refmac_5.6.0117 32-bit windows binaries run native on a win64 3-4x
slower than
those from the linux distribution run
**in a RHEL6.2-64 VMware virtual machine hosted the same windows7/64
system.**
VM/RHEL:
Refmac_5.6.0117: End of
I don't know the state of current software, because I haven't tried
recently, but when I set up my student crystallography workstations a
few years back I noticed many packages (e.g. EPMR, Phaser) that had
potentially long run times (where it is really noticeable) would run on
the identical
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Roger Rowlett rrowl...@colgate.edu wrote:
I don't know the state of current software, because I haven't tried
recently, but when I set up my student crystallography workstations a few
years back I noticed many packages (e.g. EPMR, Phaser) that had potentially
12 matches
Mail list logo
