Ethan Merritt wrote:
Please also have a look at
A Olczak, M Cianci, Q Hao, PJ Rizkallah, J Raferty, & JR Helliwell (2003).
"S-SWAT (softer single-wavelength anomalous technique)"
Acta Cryst. A59, 327-334.
in which the authors show several derivations for the estimated
anomalous signal, base
On Monday 23 March 2009 14:34:24 Peter Zwart wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> > If we then require that the rms change in intensity be greater than the
> > average noise, then we can write down the requirement:
> > sigma(I_P) < rms(deltaI)
> >
> .
> > I_P/sigma(I_P) > 1.3*sqrt(MW/N_H)/fpp
>
> one can actually r
Hi,
>
> If we then require that the rms change in intensity be greater than the
> average noise, then we can write down the requirement:
> sigma(I_P) < rms(deltaI)
>
.
.
.
> I_P/sigma(I_P) > 1.3*sqrt(MW/N_H)/fpp
one can actually require that
abs(delta I) > 3 sigma(delta I)
Using eq. 13 from Ac
I have had several people now ask me where the heck my "Crick-Magdoff"
equation came from. So it looks like brevity has once again conquered
clarity. So, those of you you enjoy my long emails read on. Those of
you who do not, I direct you to the "Delete" button that should have
come with you
