Yes, exactly, those two proteins. Were you involved?
JPK
From: Clement Angkawidjaja [mailto:clem...@evec.jp]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 12:42 AM
To: Keller, Jacob <kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
Maybe the Ca i
Maybe the Ca is just there as an additional binding site for carbonate.
Btw, are you looking at CmpA/NrtA?
Cheers,
Clement
From: Keller, Jacob
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 2:51 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
Well, I was looking at two
Once again, chemical intuition may help. At neutral pH values, sulfate
is going to be present at SO4(2-), whereas phosphate will be present as
H2PO4(-) or HPO4(2-). The hydrogen bond network supporting binding may
be able to offer clues. Sulfate is not likely to have any H-bond
acceptors in
Assuming it wasn't clear from purification/crystallisation reagents...
Maybe try a high multiplicity anomalous dataset collected in house / at
long wavelength?
P has ~ 75% the f" of S at CuKa.
If you can figure out roughly what anomalous peak height an S atom gives
from a Cys or a Met with
Similarly, how do you differentiate a phosphate ion than sulfate just based
on electron density if data is not at atomic resolution?
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Harry Powell
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Sticking to the first question, if you don't restrict
Hi all
Sticking to the first question, if you don't restrict yourself to _X-ray_
crystallography but use your local neutron source instead, it should be
straightforward (subject to all the normal caveats).
On 10 Nov 2016, at 23:02, Tim Gruene wrote:
> Dear JPK,
>
> to answer your first
, Jacob<mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:41 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
Dear Crystallographers,
I don’t think there is any feasible way crystallographically to distinguish
bet
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:41 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
Dear Crystallographers,
I don’t think there is any feasible way crystallographically to distinguish
between nitrate and carbonate or bicarbonate—correct? But that is not my main
Bicarbonate ion is a weak base and is normally protonated near neutral pH.
(Nitrate is a pathetically weak base and is not protonated at any
reasonable biological pH.) Therefore, bicarbonate will have one hydrogen
bond donor group (the -OH group) and two hydrogen bond acceptor groups,
whereas
Dear JPK,
to answer your first question, at atomic resolution you would notice a density
difference between N and C. At a little less resolution you might still
measure difference in bond length.
Regrds,
Tim
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:41:43 PM CET Keller, Jacob wrote:
> Dear
Of Keller,
Jacob
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:42 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
Dear Crystallographers,
I don't think there is any feasible way crystallographically to distinguish
between nitrate and carbonate or bicarbonate-correct? But that is not my
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Nitrate versus Carbonate
If I had to speculate, the polarity vector vs. atomic geometry would be the
difference to utilize. The pKa of carbonate is around 6.3 for the first oxygen,
so at physiological pH I would assume the majority of carbonate
Dear Crystallographers,
I don't think there is any feasible way crystallographically to distinguish
between nitrate and carbonate or bicarbonate-correct? But that is not my main
question.
My main question is: given that nitrate and carbonate are both very important
and also very different
13 matches
Mail list logo