[ccp4bb] Quick soak method

2007-09-25 Thread Derek Logan

Hi,

I'd like to find out how successful the quick soak method for heavy  
atom derivatisation proposed by Radaev and Sun:


Sun PD, Radaev S, Kattah M. Generating isomorphous heavy-atom  
derivatives by a quick-soak method. Part I: test cases. Acta Cryst.  
2002. D58:1092-1098.


has been in comparison to the classical method of longer soaks at  
low concentrations of heavy atom compound. The method was quite  
successful in our hands a few years ago but (fortunately?) it's  
becoming increasingly rare that we use heavy atoms. I understand that  
evidence will necessarily be anecdotal, but let's not let that stop us.


Derek
--
Derek Logan tel: +46 46 222 1443
Associate professor fax: +46 46 222 4692
Molecular Biophysicsmob: +46 76 8585 707
Lund University
Box 124, Lund, Sweden




Re: [ccp4bb] Quick soak method

2007-09-25 Thread artem
Hi,

I do not use their method as such - however, I love heavy atom soaks and
do them any time I can, so I've got very similar experiences in the past.

Heavy atoms can bind very quickly even from quite dilute solutions - the
quickest I've ever soaked (and got useful data) was sodium chloroplatinate
in under ten minutes at ~ 1mM concentration. The next quickest was
K2Pt(NO2)4 which tends to take between 10 minutes and 30 minutes, almost
regardless of the concentration. This is by far my favorite HAD reagent,
incidentally.

In general my soaks are all less than one hour with a few exceptions, such
as iodine [not iodide!] soak to iodinate tyrosines which is typically
better done during a day or so with very low amount of I2, via vapor
phase.

Artem

 Hi,

 I'd like to find out how successful the quick soak method for heavy
 atom derivatisation proposed by Radaev and Sun:

 Sun PD, Radaev S, Kattah M. Generating isomorphous heavy-atom
 derivatives by a quick-soak method. Part I: test cases. Acta Cryst.
 2002. D58:1092-1098.

 has been in comparison to the classical method of longer soaks at
 low concentrations of heavy atom compound. The method was quite
 successful in our hands a few years ago but (fortunately?) it's
 becoming increasingly rare that we use heavy atoms. I understand that
 evidence will necessarily be anecdotal, but let's not let that stop us.

 Derek
 --
 Derek Logan tel: +46 46 222 1443
 Associate professor fax: +46 46 222 4692
 Molecular Biophysicsmob: +46 76 8585 707
 Lund University
 Box 124, Lund, Sweden





Re: [ccp4bb] Quick soak method

2007-09-25 Thread James Whisstock
Hi - sorry -  rather than iodine I meant to say we had had success with 
Potassium Iodide (1M for 20 seconds)!

Cheers

James

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hi,
 
 I do not use their method as such - however, I love heavy atom soaks and
 do them any time I can, so I've got very similar experiences in the past.
 
 Heavy atoms can bind very quickly even from quite dilute solutions - the
 quickest I've ever soaked (and got useful data) was sodium
 chloroplatinate
 in under ten minutes at ~ 1mM concentration. The next quickest was
 K2Pt(NO2)4 which tends to take between 10 minutes and 30 minutes, almost
 regardless of the concentration. This is by far my favorite HAD reagent,
 incidentally.
 
 In general my soaks are all less than one hour with a few exceptions,
 such
 as iodine [not iodide!] soak to iodinate tyrosines which is typically
 better done during a day or so with very low amount of I2, via vapor
 phase.
 
 Artem
 
 Hi,

 I'd like to find out how successful the quick soak method for heavy
 atom derivatisation proposed by Radaev and Sun:

 Sun PD, Radaev S, Kattah M. Generating isomorphous heavy-atom
 derivatives by a quick-soak method. Part I: test cases. Acta Cryst.
 2002. D58:1092-1098.

 has been in comparison to the classical method of longer soaks at
 low concentrations of heavy atom compound. The method was quite
 successful in our hands a few years ago but (fortunately?) it's
 becoming increasingly rare that we use heavy atoms. I understand that
 evidence will necessarily be anecdotal, but let's not let that stop
 us.

 Derek
 --
 Derek Logan tel: +46 46 222 1443
 Associate professor fax: +46 46 222 4692
 Molecular Biophysicsmob: +46 76 8585 707
 Lund University
 Box 124, Lund, Sweden



-- 
Professor James Whisstock
NHMRC Principal Research Fellow / Monash University Senior Logan fellow

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Monash University, Clayton Campus, PO Box 13d, VIC, 3800, Australia
+613 9905 3747 (Phone)
+613 9905 4699 (Fax)
+61 418 170 585 (Mobile)


Re: [ccp4bb] Quick soak method

2007-09-25 Thread Jacob Keller
I also solved a structure on our home CuKa source by SIRAS with 20-60sec in 
0.5-1M KI.

JPK

==Original message text===
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 6:55:28 pm CDT James Whisstock wrote:

Hi - sorry -  rather than iodine I meant to say we had had success with 
Potassium Iodide (1M for 20 
seconds)!

Cheers

James

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hi,
 
 I do not use their method as such - however, I love heavy atom soaks and
 do them any time I can, so I've got very similar experiences in the past.
 
 Heavy atoms can bind very quickly even from quite dilute solutions - the
 quickest I've ever soaked (and got useful data) was sodium
 chloroplatinate
 in under ten minutes at ~ 1mM concentration. The next quickest was
 K2Pt(NO2)4 which tends to take between 10 minutes and 30 minutes, almost
 regardless of the concentration. This is by far my favorite HAD reagent,
 incidentally.
 
 In general my soaks are all less than one hour with a few exceptions,
 such
 as iodine [not iodide!] soak to iodinate tyrosines which is typically
 better done during a day or so with very low amount of I2, via vapor
 phase.
 
 Artem
 
 Hi,

 I'd like to find out how successful the quick soak method for heavy
 atom derivatisation proposed by Radaev and Sun:

 Sun PD, Radaev S, Kattah M. Generating isomorphous heavy-atom
 derivatives by a quick-soak method. Part I: test cases. Acta Cryst.
 2002. D58:1092-1098.

 has been in comparison to the classical method of longer soaks at
 low concentrations of heavy atom compound. The method was quite
 successful in our hands a few years ago but (fortunately?) it's
 becoming increasingly rare that we use heavy atoms. I understand that
 evidence will necessarily be anecdotal, but let's not let that stop
 us.

 Derek
 --
 Derek Logan tel: +46 46 222 1443
 Associate professor fax: +46 46 222 4692
 Molecular Biophysicsmob: +46 76 8585 707
 Lund University
 Box 124, Lund, Sweden



-- 
Professor James Whisstock
NHMRC Principal Research Fellow / Monash University Senior Logan fellow

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Monash University, Clayton Campus, PO Box 13d, VIC, 3800, Australia
+613 9905 3747 (Phone)
+613 9905 4699 (Fax)
+61 418 170 585 (Mobile)
===End of original message text===



***
Jacob Keller
Northwestern University
6541 N. Francisco #3
Chicago IL 60645
(847)491-2438
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***