Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-20 Thread Francis Reyes
I thought I saw this problem before. Though I wouldn't try it if you had 
solutions from different space groups. 


http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/find_alt_orig_sym_mate.htm

F


On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Tim Gruene  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Dear Monika,
> 
> would you mind summarising how you solved your problem? It might help
> people with similar problems!
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> On 02/20/2014 02:45 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
>> Dear users,
>> 
>> thanks alot for the tips. The problem was solved!
>> 
>> Warmest regard,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Monika Coronado
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-02-20 0:57 GMT-03:00 Jens Kaiser :
>> 
>>> Monika, There are several possible causes for the problem you
>>> are encountering, but your description is a little too vague to
>>> discern them. Scenario 1) You ran phaser with the option "all
>>> possible spacegroups", for several different components of your
>>> crystal, setup individually, and the runs do not agree on the
>>> "best spacegroup"? -- In that case, phaser had problems
>>> determining the correct spacegroup, I'd suggest you search for
>>> all components, but in separate runs for each possible 
>>> spacegroup. Scenario 2) You assumed your spacegroup assignment
>>> was correct, and ran MR for each of your components individually,
>>> and when you display the solutions, they overlap. In this case,
>>> you might have your solutions on different origins. The best way
>>> out is to use the first solution as a "fixed solution", which is
>>> possible in most MR programs, and then search for the next
>>> component. There might be other scenarios, if you describe your
>>> situation in more detail (how many components in the crystal
>>> setup, what program you used, how you used it, and what you mean
>>> by "different symmetries"), we might be able to help you better,
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Jens
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:59 -0300, Monika Coronado wrote:
 Dear,
 
 Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different
 symmetry?
 
 I will explain:
 
 I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the 
 molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however
 they have a different symmetry.
 
 
 I will appreciate any kind of help.
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 
 
 
 M￴nika
 
 -- __o _`\<,_ (*)/ (*) -+-+-+-+-+-+- * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ...E tudo
 muda...
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 * * * * * * *
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> - -- 
> - --
> Dr Tim Gruene
> Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
> Tammannstr. 4
> D-37077 Goettingen
> 
> GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove -http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iD8DBQFTBgyvUxlJ7aRr7hoRAo2BAJ0VPGwcH9FLrLI09sBwgJL9MPOVWQCgjIy1
> HoLKpUi/ZtXoP5fOOMP/Kso=
> =44Yv
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-20 Thread Monika Coronado
Dear Tim,

I have used coot.

"merge molecules"  (calculate -> merge molecules).

Using coot I have moved the molecules to the same asymmetric unit.

I have the same problem with two different proteins in one case it works.
However, for the other I am still working  :-(

Greetings,


Mônika


2014-02-20 11:09 GMT-03:00 Tim Gruene :

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Monika,
>
> would you mind summarising how you solved your problem? It might help
> people with similar problems!
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> On 02/20/2014 02:45 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
> > Dear users,
> >
> > thanks alot for the tips. The problem was solved!
> >
> > Warmest regard,
> >
> >
> >
> > Monika Coronado
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-20 0:57 GMT-03:00 Jens Kaiser :
> >
> >> Monika, There are several possible causes for the problem you
> >> are encountering, but your description is a little too vague to
> >> discern them. Scenario 1) You ran phaser with the option "all
> >> possible spacegroups", for several different components of your
> >> crystal, setup individually, and the runs do not agree on the
> >> "best spacegroup"? -- In that case, phaser had problems
> >> determining the correct spacegroup, I'd suggest you search for
> >> all components, but in separate runs for each possible
> >> spacegroup. Scenario 2) You assumed your spacegroup assignment
> >> was correct, and ran MR for each of your components individually,
> >> and when you display the solutions, they overlap. In this case,
> >> you might have your solutions on different origins. The best way
> >> out is to use the first solution as a "fixed solution", which is
> >> possible in most MR programs, and then search for the next
> >> component. There might be other scenarios, if you describe your
> >> situation in more detail (how many components in the crystal
> >> setup, what program you used, how you used it, and what you mean
> >> by "different symmetries"), we might be able to help you better,
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Jens
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:59 -0300, Monika Coronado wrote:
> >>> Dear,
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different
> >>> symmetry?
> >>>
> >>> I will explain:
> >>>
> >>> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the
> >>> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however
> >>> they have a different symmetry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I will appreciate any kind of help.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mnika
> >>>
> >>> -- __o _`\<,_ (*)/ (*) -+-+-+-+-+-+- * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ...E tudo
> >>> muda...
> >>>
> >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >>> * * * * * * *
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> - --
> - --
> Dr Tim Gruene
> Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
> Tammannstr. 4
> D-37077 Goettingen
>
> GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iD8DBQFTBgyvUxlJ7aRr7hoRAo2BAJ0VPGwcH9FLrLI09sBwgJL9MPOVWQCgjIy1
> HoLKpUi/ZtXoP5fOOMP/Kso=
> =44Yv
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>



-- 
 __o
  _`\<,_
 (*)/ (*)
 -+-+-+-+-+-+-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
...E tudo muda...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*


Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-20 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Monika,

would you mind summarising how you solved your problem? It might help
people with similar problems!

Regards,
Tim

On 02/20/2014 02:45 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
> Dear users,
> 
> thanks alot for the tips. The problem was solved!
> 
> Warmest regard,
> 
> 
> 
> Monika Coronado
> 
> 
> 2014-02-20 0:57 GMT-03:00 Jens Kaiser :
> 
>> Monika, There are several possible causes for the problem you
>> are encountering, but your description is a little too vague to
>> discern them. Scenario 1) You ran phaser with the option "all
>> possible spacegroups", for several different components of your
>> crystal, setup individually, and the runs do not agree on the
>> "best spacegroup"? -- In that case, phaser had problems
>> determining the correct spacegroup, I'd suggest you search for
>> all components, but in separate runs for each possible 
>> spacegroup. Scenario 2) You assumed your spacegroup assignment
>> was correct, and ran MR for each of your components individually,
>> and when you display the solutions, they overlap. In this case,
>> you might have your solutions on different origins. The best way
>> out is to use the first solution as a "fixed solution", which is
>> possible in most MR programs, and then search for the next
>> component. There might be other scenarios, if you describe your
>> situation in more detail (how many components in the crystal
>> setup, what program you used, how you used it, and what you mean
>> by "different symmetries"), we might be able to help you better,
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Jens
>> 
>> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:59 -0300, Monika Coronado wrote:
>>> Dear,
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different
>>> symmetry?
>>> 
>>> I will explain:
>>> 
>>> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the 
>>> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however
>>> they have a different symmetry.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I will appreciate any kind of help.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> M￴nika
>>> 
>>> -- __o _`\<,_ (*)/ (*) -+-+-+-+-+-+- * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ...E tudo
>>> muda...
>>> 
>>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>> * * * * * * *
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

- -- 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iD8DBQFTBgyvUxlJ7aRr7hoRAo2BAJ0VPGwcH9FLrLI09sBwgJL9MPOVWQCgjIy1
HoLKpUi/ZtXoP5fOOMP/Kso=
=44Yv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-20 Thread Monika Coronado
Dear users,

thanks alot for the tips. The problem was solved!

Warmest regard,



Monika Coronado


2014-02-20 0:57 GMT-03:00 Jens Kaiser :

> Monika,
>   There are several possible causes for the problem you are
> encountering, but your description is a little too vague to discern
> them.
>   Scenario 1) You ran phaser with the option "all possible spacegroups",
> for several different components of your crystal, setup individually,
> and the runs do not agree on the "best spacegroup"? -- In that case,
> phaser had problems determining the correct spacegroup, I'd suggest you
> search for all components, but in separate runs for each possible
> spacegroup.
>   Scenario 2) You assumed your spacegroup assignment was correct, and
> ran MR for each of your components individually, and when you display
> the solutions, they overlap. In this case, you might have your solutions
> on different origins. The best way out is to use the first solution as a
> "fixed solution", which is possible in most MR programs, and then search
> for the next component.
>   There might be other scenarios, if you describe your situation in more
> detail (how many components in the crystal setup, what program you used,
> how you used it, and what you mean by "different symmetries"), we might
> be able to help you better,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jens
>
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:59 -0300, Monika Coronado wrote:
> > Dear,
> >
> > Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different symmetry?
> >
> > I will explain:
> >
> > I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the
> > molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however they
> > have a different symmetry.
> >
> >
> > I will appreciate any kind of help.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mônika
> >
> > --
> >  __o
> >   _`\<,_
> >  (*)/ (*)
> >  -+-+-+-+-+-+-
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > * * * *
> > ...E tudo muda...
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > * * * *
> >
>
>
>


-- 
 __o
  _`\<,_
 (*)/ (*)
 -+-+-+-+-+-+-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
...E tudo muda...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*


Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-19 Thread Jens Kaiser
Monika,
  There are several possible causes for the problem you are
encountering, but your description is a little too vague to discern
them.
  Scenario 1) You ran phaser with the option "all possible spacegroups",
for several different components of your crystal, setup individually,
and the runs do not agree on the "best spacegroup"? -- In that case,
phaser had problems determining the correct spacegroup, I'd suggest you
search for all components, but in separate runs for each possible
spacegroup.
  Scenario 2) You assumed your spacegroup assignment was correct, and
ran MR for each of your components individually, and when you display
the solutions, they overlap. In this case, you might have your solutions
on different origins. The best way out is to use the first solution as a
"fixed solution", which is possible in most MR programs, and then search
for the next component.
  There might be other scenarios, if you describe your situation in more
detail (how many components in the crystal setup, what program you used,
how you used it, and what you mean by "different symmetries"), we might
be able to help you better,

Cheers,

Jens

On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:59 -0300, Monika Coronado wrote:
> Dear,
> 
> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different symmetry?
> 
> I will explain:
> 
> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the
> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however they
> have a different symmetry.
> 
> 
> I will appreciate any kind of help.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mônika
> 
> -- 
>  __o
>   _`\<,_
>  (*)/ (*)
>  -+-+-+-+-+-+-
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * * * *
> ...E tudo muda...
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * * * * 
> 


Re: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-19 Thread Shu Xu
Hi, Monika,
It sounds like you got the two domains separately in the asymmetric unit.
You could do the symmetric operation for one of the domains in pymol by 
generating the symmetric mates (say 10 Å).
Then you should see several same ones there. Select the one you need, and save 
the coordinates, then you can combine this to the other domain.
Cheers,
Shu
---
Shu Xu, Ph.D.
Research Fellow
Department of Biochemistry
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
Tel: (615)-343-7327
E-mail: xushuh...@gmail.com
On Feb 19, 2014, at 4:40 AM, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:

> Another option would be the "merge molecules" option in coot (calculate -> 
> merge molecules). In coot you would also be able to move the molecules to the 
> same asymmetric unit if that would be necessary. However, depending on the 
> space group the MR solutions could have different origins and with polar 
> space groups one (or three in P1!) coordinates may be arbitrary, prohibiting 
> any merging efforts.
> 
> The best way to go is to search for both molecules in one go. E.g. Phaser has 
> the possibility to give two or more search models and then first search with 
> the first model, and then with the second in the context of the solution for 
> the first solution. I am sure other MR programs have similar options. If you 
> wish, I could provide you with a sample command file.
> 
> Best regards,
> Herman
> 
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Tim 
> Gruene
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:25
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Dear Monika,
> 
> What program did you use for MR? I would expect the output PDB file has the 
> correct cell and symmetry from the mtz-file you replaced against.
> 
> To answer your question: you can simply concatenate the two files (e.g. with 
> a text editor), remove the CRYST1 card and set it with pdbset:
> 
> pdbset xyzin your.pdb xyzout yourpdb_with_new_sg.pdb << eof CELL yourA yourB 
> yourC yourAlpha yourBeta yourGamma SPAC yourSpacegroup end eof
> 
> Best,
> Tim
> 
> On 02/18/2014 06:59 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
>> Dear,
>> 
>> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different symmetry?
>> 
>> I will explain:
>> 
>> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the 
>> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however they 
>> have a different symmetry.
>> 
>> I will appreciate any kind of help.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> M￴nika
>> 
> 
> - --
> - --
> Dr Tim Gruene
> Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
> Tammannstr. 4
> D-37077 Goettingen
> 
> GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iD8DBQFTBHhtUxlJ7aRr7hoRApb1AJ9FwxpTIbtcIlJyuU0Rn7u1UxLHrACglchR
> weQEKA+/lnmIkQKtHd+nhj4=
> =LgoX
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-


[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-19 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Another option would be the "merge molecules" option in coot (calculate -> 
merge molecules). In coot you would also be able to move the molecules to the 
same asymmetric unit if that would be necessary. However, depending on the 
space group the MR solutions could have different origins and with polar space 
groups one (or three in P1!) coordinates may be arbitrary, prohibiting any 
merging efforts.

The best way to go is to search for both molecules in one go. E.g. Phaser has 
the possibility to give two or more search models and then first search with 
the first model, and then with the second in the context of the solution for 
the first solution. I am sure other MR programs have similar options. If you 
wish, I could provide you with a sample command file.

Best regards,
Herman

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Tim 
Gruene
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:25
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Monika,

What program did you use for MR? I would expect the output PDB file has the 
correct cell and symmetry from the mtz-file you replaced against.

To answer your question: you can simply concatenate the two files (e.g. with a 
text editor), remove the CRYST1 card and set it with pdbset:

pdbset xyzin your.pdb xyzout yourpdb_with_new_sg.pdb << eof CELL yourA yourB 
yourC yourAlpha yourBeta yourGamma SPAC yourSpacegroup end eof

Best,
Tim

On 02/18/2014 06:59 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
> Dear,
> 
> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different symmetry?
> 
> I will explain:
> 
> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the 
> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however they 
> have a different symmetry.
> 
> I will appreciate any kind of help.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> M￴nika
> 

- --
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iD8DBQFTBHhtUxlJ7aRr7hoRApb1AJ9FwxpTIbtcIlJyuU0Rn7u1UxLHrACglchR
weQEKA+/lnmIkQKtHd+nhj4=
=LgoX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-19 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Monika,

What program did you use for MR? I would expect the output PDB file
has the correct cell and symmetry from the mtz-file you replaced against.

To answer your question: you can simply concatenate the two files
(e.g. with a text editor), remove the CRYST1 card and set it with pdbset:

pdbset xyzin your.pdb xyzout yourpdb_with_new_sg.pdb << eof
CELL yourA yourB yourC yourAlpha yourBeta yourGamma
SPAC yourSpacegroup
end
eof

Best,
Tim

On 02/18/2014 06:59 PM, Monika Coronado wrote:
> Dear,
> 
> Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different
> symmetry?
> 
> I will explain:
> 
> I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the
> molecules separately, now I have to put all together, however they
> have a different symmetry.
> 
> I will appreciate any kind of help.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> M￴nika
> 

- -- 
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iD8DBQFTBHhtUxlJ7aRr7hoRApb1AJ9FwxpTIbtcIlJyuU0Rn7u1UxLHrACglchR
weQEKA+/lnmIkQKtHd+nhj4=
=LgoX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[ccp4bb] Symmetry problem

2014-02-18 Thread Monika Coronado
Dear,

Does anyone know how to merge two molecules with different symmetry?

I will explain:

I have done the molecular replacement using the domains of the molecules
separately, now I have to put all together, however they have a different
symmetry.

I will appreciate any kind of help.


Regards,



Mônika

-- 
 __o
  _`\<,_
 (*)/ (*)
 -+-+-+-+-+-+-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
...E tudo muda...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*