Dear All,
Scott has good point.And the requesting party should reply to these kind
mails very quickly ,so as to avoid of receiving huge number of same paper
from different persons,(such a basic sense is important to avoid of wasting
others time.)
thanks.
(still am confused about how far or how
I vote for an inclusive BB - it is easy to delete the irrelevent (to
you) messages, and nice to know there is a helpful community out there
who are prepared to help..
Presumably copyright violations do not result from sharing with one
request..
Eleanor
Jayashankar wrote:
Dear All,
Hi,
(still am confused about how far or how much a commercial people(non
academic) can access this BB)
Most of the people I know in industry at least occasionally read this board.
Not everyone posts of course, but that's nothing to do with your affiliation
- not everyone from academia posts
Dear All,
There seems to be an increasing number of requests for articles on the
BB. Can we assume that those supplying articles hold the necessary
copyright permissions? Since the BB is visible and archived, I just want
to be sure everything is nice and legal.
regards
Martyn
--
May I also suggest that the more traditional avenue - requesting the
reprint from the corresponding author - is always tried first? I used
to do this back in time when I was a poor russian grad student with zero
access to full-text articles. Also handy if you collect stamps :)
On Tue,
It is impossible to know when someone has an anonymous user name and
email address.
I would suggest, minimally, that if someone asks us to send a paper,
they need to sign their
correspondence unambiguously (name and institution). Also, several
requests in the span of
three weeks from the
