Re: [ccp4bb] aimless outputs mean intensities for friedel pairs

2020-03-31 Thread Phil
Indeed, centric reflections should have no anomalous signal after merging Phil Sent from my iPhone > On 31 Mar 2020, at 05:48, Kevin Jude wrote: > >  > I've had two more helpful responses to this off-list. My crystal is P43212, > so there are large swaths of centric reflections that I was

Re: [ccp4bb] aimless outputs mean intensities for friedel pairs

2020-03-30 Thread Kevin Jude
I've had two more helpful responses to this off-list. My crystal is P43212, so there are large swaths of centric reflections that I was looking at. And indeed, {18,1,1} is not the first reflection with anomalous differences if I look more carefully. Different sorting of the outputs by phenix and

Re: [ccp4bb] aimless outputs mean intensities for friedel pairs

2020-03-30 Thread Kevin Jude
Thanks Reza. Changing the rejection criteria didn't have any effect, but I tried xdsconv and got what looked like the same result - ie, DANO = 0. That got me started looking at more reflections, and if I make it all the way down to {18,1,1) there's suddenly a switch and anomalous differences are

Re: [ccp4bb] aimless outputs mean intensities for friedel pairs

2020-03-30 Thread Rezaul Karim
Hi Kevin,Just a thought, guidance is left to the experts. Since the aimless reports significant anomalous signal default anomalous rejection criteria most likely is too strict for this run. Changing the default "reject 6 all -8" value to loosen the rejection criteria might give some clue

[ccp4bb] aimless outputs mean intensities for friedel pairs

2020-03-30 Thread Kevin Jude
Hi all, I am trying to merge and convert reflections from XDS_ASCII.HKL to mtz via pointless and aimless. Everything looks good through pointless, as far as I understand: xds reports significant anomalous correlation in CORRECT.LP Inspection of the mtz output from pointless shows that (+) and (-)