Hello Juan
First, there's a phenix.refine bulletin board, on which you might
attract the attention of the developers, which might help.
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
I've been using 1.17-3644 without issues after transitioning from
something older. Consider downgradi
Dear all,
I have been working on the refinement of a crystal structure using
phenix.refine from the 1.12-2828-Intel-Linux-2.6 version of Phenix. I
have recently replaced my computer by a MacBook and I have upgraded
Phenix to the 1.18.2-3874-MacOs version. However, I found that the
refineme
Rfactors can vary a lot for equally good results it seems. You need to
look at your Rfactor v resolution to see if there are any problems - ice
rings? low resolution stuff? etc etc
Have you used TLS sensibly - this can help..
etc etc
But if the maplooks good you should be happy.
Eleanor
Tim G
Hi Atul,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:14:28AM +, atul kumar wrote:
Dear all
[...] these. Other than that, there are no major issues. I was just
wondering if the present R-factor values seem alright for a 1.9 ang data,
which many of you have suggested it does?
Atul
the typical R-facto
!
Gina
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
atul kumar
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 5:14 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] model refinement (corrections, apologies!)
Dear all
Thanks for your replies. And thanks to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:14:28AM +, atul kumar wrote:
> Dear all
>
> [...] these. Other than that, there are no major issues. I was just
> wondering if the present R-factor values seem alright for a 1.9 ang data,
> which many of you have suggested it does?
>
> Atul
Yes, it does. The R-val
Hi Atul,
With an I/sig of 2.3 and 99.9% completeness in the highest resolution
shell you could have collected to an even higher resolution it would
seem That might help in modeling the solvent molecules. Do you have
more crystals?
Flip
atul kumar wrote:
Dear all
Thanks for your replie
Dear all
Thanks for your replies. And thanks to all those who noticed that I had
posted wrong unit cell dimensions for P3221 (which I picked from the header
of the template pdb).
My space group is P3221 (unit cell 54.8 54.8 100.1 90 90 120).
Data quality appears fine. I/sigI=4.9; Rmerge=0.088;
Dear all
I am trying to solve structure of data set at 1.9 A,r merge 9.3,it belongs
to space group P3221 unit cell 160.78 157.32 135.62 90.0 90.0 90.0,i has no
NCS ,i did tls refinement as well but after water addition the r factor and
r free is stucked at 22 and 25 respectively.suggestions are req
