Hi there,
I was just pointed to this thread and should comment on the discussion, as
actually made the plots for this paper. James has clarified the issue much
better than I could have, and indeed the calculations will fail for larger
Bragg angles if you do not assume a reasonable B-factor (I
- - REMINDER - -
IMMINENT CLOSING DATE: 28th September 2012
3 (Three) Cancer Research UK-funded Postdoctoral Research Fellow positions
are available immediately in the laboratory of Professor Laurence Pearl
FRS and Dr Antony Oliver, to study the structural basis for the assembly
and specificity
Good point! With 9 parameters there must be a zillion combinations that produce
a decent fit. But even if they are chosen to be similar they have no physical
meaning, right?
Cheers, Oliver.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
Gesendet:
Dear you all
I really need your help. I was trying to install ccp4i Package Manager, and
got an error saying /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 version 'GLIBC-2.4' not found.
The file '/lib64/tls/libc.so.6' was actually linked to 'libc-2.3.4.so'. I
thought this one might be out of date. So I found a newer
Those commands which do not work apparently require the version of libc
that you replaced. If your description is accurate, you did not actually
delete the file, but merely renamed it.
You can boot up from your Linux (this is Linux, right?) installation
disk in RESCUE mode and put the file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Jie Liu,
libc is a very basic library and your Linux box is close to unusable
without it or with the wrong version. Your computer would probably not
boot anymore.
- From what you describe, though, it should be simple to fix the
problem. Find the
Not to worry- since you carefully preerved the original files,
you can easlily recover. You just need to boot a live CD
like DSL or fdora live (or maybe even Tom's Root Boot disk)
to bring up a system that can mount your filesystem and allow you to
undue the failed experiment.
Recent fedora live
That's really interesting! Since the fits then and now were both
least-squares, I wonder how Cromer Mann could have gotten it so far
off? Looking at the residuals, I see that although that of nitrogen
oscillates badly, even the worst outlier is still within 0.01 electrons
of the
