Re: [ccp4bb] Refmac problem: Validation and Analysis

Dear Marian, Thanks for your report. I'm sorry you're having to deal with this problem. There is nothing wrong with your machine; this is an identified bug and we're working towards fixing it. In the meantime, the only workaround I can think of is to roll CCP4 back to a previous update, e.g. 015.

[ccp4bb] Refmac problem: Validation and Analysis

Dear list, I have a problem running the Validation and Analysis in Refmac and I would really appreciate any feed-back from your side. I am using CCP4i2 (CCP4-8.0.018 locally running in Ubuntu 20.04.4). Last time I was using Refmac was in November 2023. At the time, I posted in the list an

[ccp4bb] Instruct-ERIC Structure Meets Function Webinar 32

Register now for the 32nd edition of the Instruct-ERIC Structure Meets Function webinar series, taking place on Zoom, 17 April at 11:00 CEST. Register

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution discrepancy between MTZ file and Refinement

Hi Kay and Garib, Thank you for your input. It is actually the twin refinement that gave rise to resolution discrepancy. For what reason I don't remember that I have turned the twin refinement ON and the same job was cloned again and again. With the twin refinement OFF, it gave rise to resolution

[ccp4bb] Register Now for a Virtual Deep Dive into Computed Structure Model Exploration at RCSB.org

Join us as we demonstrate how RCSB.org serves as your gateway to structural data exploration on Tuesday April 30, 2024 from noon-1pm Eastern, 9-10am Pacific This event will equip you with the knowledge of how to use RCSB.org features to navigate 3D predicted protein structures in the context of

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution discrepancy between MTZ file and Refinement

Unless you are confident that twin exists you should not use twin refinement (Occam’s razor) > On 5 Apr 2024, at 17:24, venkatareddy dadireddy wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the LMB: > .-owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk -. > Do not

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution discrepancy between MTZ file and Refinement

Thank you very much Garib. Venkat On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 1:12 AM Garib Murshudov wrote: > Unless you are confident that twin exists you should not use twin > refinement (Occam’s razor) > > > > On 5 Apr 2024, at 17:24, venkatareddy dadireddy > wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from

[ccp4bb] postdoc position in Vancouver - cryo-EM analysis of bioelectricity complexes

Dear colleagues, A postdoctoral position is available to work on the problem of coupling between different ion channels in electrically excitable tissues. https://www.vanpetegemlab.com/opportunities.html The project entails cryo-EM, electrophysiology and protein biophysics, and will make use of