At UMR, for whatever reason they had no carriage control on tape channel
12. If you were a clever (and unpopular) coder you could skip to
channel 12 an accomplish the same thing.
Programming languages in the shop had library overrides to make that a
carriage control (another channel) but
On 05/25/2016 12:41 PM, Lawrence Wilkinson wrote:
Card (paper) ones did exist! But I suspect they were only
for emergency FE use.
It may be that the mylar ones were not manual-punch
friendly, so you could
make a duplicate to use while you waited for the proper
spare to arrive.
There's a
On 25/05/2016 23:43, Antonio Carlini wrote:
On 25/05/16 01:30, Rod Smallwood wrote:
On 24/05/2016 22:41, Glen Slick wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Rod Smallwood
wrote:
Hi
My main system a VAX 4000 Model 500 with a KA680 CPU has just
started
On 05/25/2016 07:22 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
> Speaking of dumps I remember an engineer friend telling me that at
> the university that he went to they had a CDC Cyber system and they
> discovered that you could initiate a dump from any workstation, and
> the system would dump out to the printer
On 2016-05-25 10:43 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
The train printers did have an obvious advantage over both the drum
and band printers. In our shop, we printed lots and lots of core
dumps. Add to a full CM dump, a couple of million words of ECS and the
"0" characters wore out pretty quickly. You
On 05/25/2016 06:16 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
> I only ever saw one of the drum style high speed printers and I think
> it was a Honeywell wavey line printer. I remember the operator
> demoed it for us by printing a picture, if you printed a whole line
> of the same character it would fire every
On 2016-05-25 10:14 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
On 05/25/2016 05:31 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Jon Elson
>> I interned at IBM Bermuda, and they had a 360/20 as their
main service
>> bureau machine; it had (IIRC) ... a 4301 printer.
> I'm guessing, maybe, that would be a
On 2016-05-25 9:46 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/25/2016 05:17 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
The train printers where amazing technology but what often killed
the trains was an operator who neglected to top off the oil
reservoir, if the train went dry they would literally screech to a
halt. It was
On 05/25/2016 05:31 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Jon Elson
>> I interned at IBM Bermuda, and they had a 360/20 as their main service
>> bureau machine; it had (IIRC) ... a 4301 printer.
> I'm guessing, maybe, that would be a 1403 printer?
Ah, right you are! The old grey
On 05/25/2016 02:51 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
I have a related question. All of the S/260s that I've seen had 2400
series tape drives. But my "green card" makes reference to 729 drives
as well. Does anyone recall them being installed on a S/360 system?
--Chuck
Well, the early 2400 tape drives
- Original Message -
From: "Al Kossow"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: WTB: Compaq Portable 486 for parts.
>
>
> On 5/25/16 12:16 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
>
>> am trying to help someone replace his damaged one.
>>
>
>
On 05/25/2016 05:17 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
> The train printers where amazing technology but what often killed
> the trains was an operator who neglected to top off the oil
> reservoir, if the train went dry they would literally screech to a
> halt. It was always interesting when someone put a
On 2016-05-25 8:48 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/25/2016 03:31 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Those printers had an amazingly long life! They were first introduced
in 1959 with the 1401 computer, and, like I said, the brand spanking
new System 3 they got in ca. 1976 came with one! I wonder when IBM
On 2016-05-25 8:47 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
On 5/25/2016 4:29 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Those printers had an amazingly long life! They were first
introduced in 1959
with the 1401 computer, and, like I said, the brand spanking new
System 3
they got in ca.
On 5/25/2016 4:29 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Those printers had an amazingly long life! They were first introduced
in 1959
with the 1401 computer, and, like I said, the brand spanking new
System 3
they got in ca. 1976 came with one! I wonder when IBM
On 05/25/2016 03:31 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> Those printers had an amazingly long life! They were first introduced
> in 1959 with the 1401 computer, and, like I said, the brand spanking
> new System 3 they got in ca. 1976 came with one! I wonder when IBM
> stopped producing them?
One of the
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Those printers had an amazingly long life! They were first introduced in 1959
with the 1401 computer, and, like I said, the brand spanking new System 3
they got in ca. 1976 came with one! I wonder when IBM stopped producing
them?
Did they discontinue
On 5/25/16 12:16 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
> am trying to help someone replace his damaged one.
>
is the guy in texas?
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:48 AM, William Donzelli wrote:
>> I'm guessing, maybe, that would be a 1403 printer? There were 1403 and 1443
>> printers.
>
> There was also a 1404 printer, but I do not think many places had them.
>
> Does anyone know what became of the two S/360
On 25/05/16 01:30, Rod Smallwood wrote:
On 24/05/2016 22:41, Glen Slick wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Rod Smallwood
wrote:
Hi
My main system a VAX 4000 Model 500 with a KA680 CPU has just
started
halting at test 51 on power up.
Does any body
> From: Jon Elson
>> I interned at IBM Bermuda, and they had a 360/20 as their main service
>> bureau machine; it had (IIRC) ... a 4301 printer.
> I'm guessing, maybe, that would be a 1403 printer?
Ah, right you are! The old grey cells are, well, old! ;-)
Those printers had an
On 05/25/2016 08:36 AM, Aaron Jackson wrote:
I just revisited the Wikipedia page for the BBC Micro Tube [1].
Apparently with a 32bit NS320 processor it was possible to run some
variant of UNIX? Does anyone know anything about this? I'd be very
interested in experimenting with it, if it is true.
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis
> Sent: 25 May 2016 20:54
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Front panel switches - what did they do?
>
> On 05/25/2016 12:35 PM,
On 5/25/2016 12:51 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
I have a related question. All of the S/260s that I've seen had 2400
series tape drives. But my "green card" makes reference to 729 drives
as well. Does anyone recall them being installed on a S/360 system?
--Chuck
Our 360/50 had 2400 drives. Read
On 05/25/2016 12:35 PM, Dave Wade wrote:
> According to Wikip around 10,000 1130's were sold.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1130
>
> one salesman claims to have sold 1,000. They were dotted about all
> over the place, so when I was a Student in the UK Newcastle
> University had a
I have a related question. All of the S/260s that I've seen had 2400
series tape drives. But my "green card" makes reference to 729 drives
as well. Does anyone recall them being installed on a S/360 system?
--Chuck
On 2016-May-24, at 5:48 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>> On May 24, 2016, at 8:30 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>>> Yes, I examined this in some detail last year after mention on the list,
>>> and wrote it up:
On 2016-May-24, at 5:30 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>> Yes, I examined this in some detail last year after mention on the list, and
>> wrote it up:
>>http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~hilpert/e/corerope/index.html
>
> That's a
By any chance does anybody have a defunct Portable 486c that they can part with?
Only really needs a good case; am trying to help someone replace his damaged
one.
TIA,
mike
On 2016-May-24, at 7:18 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 02:33 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
>> On 2016-May-24, at 12:08 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>> On 05/24/2016 11:22 AM, Al Kossow wrote:
On 5/24/16 10:44 AM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> There was also automated "stapled wire". I forget
> I'm guessing, maybe, that would be a 1403 printer? There were 1403 and 1443
> printers.
There was also a 1404 printer, but I do not think many places had them.
Does anyone know what became of the two S/360 model 20 systems that
came out of Sweden a year or two ago? They were fairly complete
On 25/05/16 01:03, Paul Berger wrote:
On 2016-05-24 7:44 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/24/2016 02:21 PM, Paul Berger wrote:
The CROS cards used in a 360/30 where the same size as an 80 column
card on purpose so you could you a keypunch machine to program the
microcode.
But I believe that
On 05/25/2016 12:11 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/25/2016 10:06 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
The only language supported on the 360/20 was RPG. For a mostly tab
card type of operation, you could actually do a lot in RPG.
Otherwise, you had to write in machine language and get it assembled
on another
On 2016-05-25 2:06 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
On 05/25/2016 12:01 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Jon Elson
> the /20 was intended for very specific uses in 360 shops, and
maybe as
> an entry-level "foot in the door" to move totally tab card
shops into
> the 360 family. The
>
> The only language supported on the 360/20 was RPG. For a mostly tab card
> type of operation, you could actually do a lot in RPG. Otherwise, you had
> to write in machine language and get it assembled on another system.
I never used a /20, but I did a lot RPG/II on a model /40. It is in
On 05/25/2016 10:06 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> The only language supported on the 360/20 was RPG. For a mostly tab
> card type of operation, you could actually do a lot in RPG.
> Otherwise, you had to write in machine language and get it assembled
> on another system.
My recollection was that
On 05/25/2016 09:01 AM, jwsmobile wrote:
> McAuto in St. Louis used a lot of the /20's for their printer farm,
> and that was the only place I ever saw one in use. They spooled tape
> to printer in the use it was put to.
According to WikiP, IBM leased over 7,000 of the 20s, so that would make
On 05/25/2016 12:01 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Jon Elson
> the /20 was intended for very specific uses in 360 shops, and maybe as
> an entry-level "foot in the door" to move totally tab card shops into
> the 360 family. The only /20s I ever saw were used as offline
> From: Jon Elson
> the /20 was intended for very specific uses in 360 shops, and maybe as
> an entry-level "foot in the door" to move totally tab card shops into
> the 360 family. The only /20s I ever saw were used as offline spool
> printers and card readers in large 360
On 5/25/2016 8:48 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
The only /20s I ever saw were used as offline spool printers and card
readers in large 360 shops.
At our school, University of Missouri, Rolla, they purchased a 360/50 in
maybe 69 or so. Because of the nature of the order it couldn't be
delivered, and
On 05/24/2016 11:47 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 05/24/2016 08:48 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
For sure! The 360/30 was an 8 BIT machine, 8-bit memory, 8-bit data
paths, etc. Really hobbled the performance, and restricted the
peripherals that could be attached. The models /22 and /25 had 16-bit
memory
On 5/25/16 8:28 AM, Al Kossow wrote:
> mentions a 441x line that ran uTek, that I never heard of
431x
Things went well reading the floppies. Everything should be uploaded by noon
PDT.
There were bits of the system and smalltalk for the 4405/6, so it would be nice
if someone
might have one of these to dump the firmware, though there probably isn't
enought to boot one.
checked with
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> The emulator was loaded, on those rare occasions where the memory got
> wiped, using the "Emulator IPL" button, from a binary card deck. That deck
> was pretty slick: it was a channel program loop. No CPU code
> is dated almost exactly one month before DEC announced the PDP-8 and I am
> sure targets the same markets DEC did. You just wonder if IBM had spies in
> DEC, or more likely they both spotted a marketing opportunity.
The latter. Every company in the world seems to have explored the
On 2016-05-25 7:06 AM, Dave Wade wrote:
paths.
Do you mean the 360/20? On the topic, were the 20 and 40 the only members
of System 360 to use TROS?
I remember picking up the programming manual for a Model 20 and realizing
that I'd essentially have to re-learn programming. 16 bit registers,
> On May 24, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> On 05/24/2016 02:13 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>> I seem to recall that reworking the 360/30 microprogramming was preferred by
>> tinkerers over the 360/40 was primarily that CROS was easier to work with
>> than TROS. I
> On May 24, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> On 05/24/2016 12:17 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>> A couple of observations.
>>
>> Taking the PDP-11 as a fairly typical example, the switches are "data" and
>> "address". While running, the data switches were visible to
I just revisited the Wikipedia page for the BBC Micro Tube [1].
Apparently with a 32bit NS320 processor it was possible to run some
variant of UNIX? Does anyone know anything about this? I'd be very
interested in experimenting with it, if it is true.
Thanks,
Aaron
[1]
I have an M9300 bus terminator which I read is the same as a M930 with the
NPR logic (so you don't also need an NPR terminator in slot 3/4). I don't
want to blow anything up, but I am thinking I can replace the M930 and
G7273 in the last slot of my backplane with a W2-open M9300.
I have
paths.
>
> Do you mean the 360/20? On the topic, were the 20 and 40 the only members
> of System 360 to use TROS?
>
> I remember picking up the programming manual for a Model 20 and realizing
> that I'd essentially have to re-learn programming. 16 bit registers,
> stripped-
> down instruction
Am 25.05.2016 um 06:45 schrieb drlegendre .:
It may, in fact, be possible - with custom ROMs - to use the 1541 for other
formats. But it's telling that no one, so far as I know, has ever managed
to create software to 'tween the various 5-1/4" floppy formats, using the
1541 transport & hardware.
52 matches
Mail list logo