Original message
From: "drlegendre ."
Date: 2017-01-03 8:03 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Subject: Re: was: National Semi... is Apple ][ collectability (if any)
"Vent-less case" -
If you can't find them, I'll look Sunday. I'll be out of town for a few
days.
Paul
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
> I am looking for schematics or any documentation for the LA180
> interface for the PDP8/e. A scan would be great. I want to see if I
>
"Vent-less case" - LoL!!
Add some RAM, maybe a DISC-II card and those things overheated even +with+
the vents.. that's why the Cider fan became popular, among other things.
When I was in high school, we'd pop the case tops open, and run them that
way. Otherwise, they'd overheat and start
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Charles Dickman wrote:
> I am looking for schematics or any documentation for the LA180
> interface for the PDP8/e. A scan would be great. I want to see if I
> can use it to interface to a Centronics interface printer.
I don't have the
On 1/3/17 12:50 PM, David Brownlee wrote:
On 3 January 2017 at 20:11, David Brownlee wrote:
On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Josh Dersch
> Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
>
On 01/03/2017 01:47 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
On Tue, 1/3/17, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
What I’m wondering is if anyone is familiar with the setup/adjustment
procedure for getting the heads set correctly. There *might* be a couple of
unused tracks I can relocate heads
On 1/3/17 5:42 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
> I think Paul Pierce's machine is at LCM now.
They have his LGP-30
On 1/3/17 5:42 PM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
> Someone should do the same for the surviving G-15s as well. I think Paul
> Pierce's machine is at LCM now.
>
turns out we have it
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102728118
On 1/3/17 5:22 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> The key questions for reconstructing such a device is what the modulation
> scheme is, and the pulse pattern.
There are running LGP-30s. Should be short work with a digital oscillosope to
capture the flux changes.
Hopefully, someone has done this
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2017 01:42 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> Very ambitious. IIRC for the G-15 there is/are (one? two?) timing
>> track(s) which were written at the factory. Of course whatever that
>> machine was, has not survived.
I am looking for schematics or any documentation for the LA180
interface for the PDP8/e. A scan would be great. I want to see if I
can use it to interface to a Centronics interface printer.
-chuck
On Jan 3, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Klemens Krause wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
>>
>>
>> What I’m wondering is if anyone is familiar with the setup/adjustment
>> procedure for getting the heads set correctly. There *might* be a couple of
> We relocated some of the heads on
On 01/03/2017 01:42 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Very ambitious. IIRC for the G-15 there is/are (one? two?) timing
> track(s) which were written at the factory. Of course whatever that
> machine was, has not survived. I remember reading that if you lost
> that timing track, your machine was
On 01/03/2017 01:19 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> Metal alloy plating seems common in fixed head disks also, at least
> in the ones from DEC I have seen. Making a new drum sounds like a
> great class project for an ambitious machine shop student.
Modern CNC gear and carbide bits should make this
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:19:01PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> Making a new drum sounds like a great class project for an ambitious
> machine shop student.
Very ambitious. IIRC for the G-15 there is/are (one? two?) timing track(s)
which were written at the factory. Of course whatever that
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 4:15 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2017 12:57 PM, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
>
>> Once I can make sense of the timing tracks, I think I'll proceed with
>> this. Not sure how I feel about using a micro-based solution though.
>> Just seems wrong : ) -C
On 01/03/2017 12:57 PM, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
> Once I can make sense of the timing tracks, I think I'll proceed with
> this. Not sure how I feel about using a micro-based solution though.
> Just seems wrong : ) -C
If enough working heads can be found, the drum probably can be
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Brian L. Stuart
wrote:
> On Tue, 1/3/17, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
> > What I’m wondering is if anyone is familiar with the setup/adjustment
> > procedure for getting the heads set correctly. There *might* be a
On 3 January 2017 at 20:11, David Brownlee wrote:
> On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> > From: Josh Dersch
>>
>> > Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
>> > future might make use of it.
>>
>> To
- Original Message -
From: "James Attfield"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2017 4:09 PM
Subject: Desparately seeking Cromemco chassis (UK)
> Wishing all here a very Happy New Year!
>
> Along with some other folks in 2017 I have decided I am
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
What I’m wondering is if anyone is familiar with the setup/adjustment
procedure for getting the heads set correctly. There *might* be a couple of
We relocated some of the heads on our second LGP-30. This is not
difficult. We put 3 or 4 layers of 3
On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Josh Dersch
>
> > Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
> > future might make use of it.
>
> To help disseminate it, I uploaded the fix to the Computer History wiki:
>
>
On Tue, 1/3/17, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
> What I’m wondering is if anyone is familiar with the setup/adjustment
> procedure for getting the heads set correctly. There *might* be a couple of
> unused tracks I can relocate heads to, but my thought is that if half a
>
In a message dated 1/3/2017 11:11:54 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
el...@pico-systems.com writes:
On 01/03/2017 10:58 AM, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
> While waiting for the machine, I decided to investigate the stuck drum.
> This unit has 71 read/write heads plus what appears to be an
On 01/03/2017 10:58 AM, Cory Heisterkamp wrote:
While waiting for the machine, I decided to investigate the stuck drum.
This unit has 71 read/write heads plus what appears to be an inductive
pickup for the system clock. Upon closer examination I discovered multiple
heads in contact with the drum
While waiting for the machine, I decided to investigate the stuck drum.
This unit has 71 read/write heads plus what appears to be an inductive
pickup for the system clock. Upon closer examination I discovered multiple
heads in contact with the drum surface preventing rotation. And in the
process
thanks. guess I should do that
my files in http://bitsavers.org/bits/Foonly/F2
On 1/3/17 4:53 PM, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
>> Appeared here:
>>
>> http://github.com/PDP-10/FOONEX
>
> The web says:
> "Initial checkin whilst I figure out what format the files are"
>
> I took a quick look and
Al Kossow wrote:
> Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>> Appeared here:
>> http://github.com/PDP-10/FOONEX
> wonder if its the code on bitsavers I got from a Symbolics backup tape
Yes, it looks much like the contents of your F2/files directory, minus
the microcode.
How far did Foonex diverge from BB TENEX? If not TOO far, it might
be nice to have them both as branches in one repository, for comparison.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:32:28PM -0800, Richard Pope wrote:
>Walter,
>. . . . I appreciate all of this information. I have a revision 2.0
>board and my info shows U8 as a 96S02 multivibrator chip. I have tried
>to find a replacement for this and I have not been successful.
>On 1/2/2017 11:26 PM, Brad H wrote:
> I brought the RFI thing up with him. No response. There is a legit Rev 1
> there too asking $3500. I don't find Apple IIs below Rev 0 that interesting
> anymore, personally. I think even the legit guy would struggle to get much
> above $1500.
>The
> Appeared here:
>
> http://github.com/PDP-10/FOONEX
The web says:
"Initial checkin whilst I figure out what format the files are"
I took a quick look and guessed a little:
#include
typedef unsigned long long w36;
void pchar(char c)
{
c &= 0177;
if ((c < ' ') || (c ==
> From: Josh Dersch
> Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
> future might make use of it.
To help disseminate it, I uploaded the fix to the Computer History wiki:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/CDU-710/M_disk_controller
> From: Lars Brinkhoff
>
Wishing all here a very Happy New Year!
Along with some other folks in 2017 I have decided I am going to ripple
through all of my vintage systems and warm their beautiful and friendly
caches.
I won't have a problem with my BBC Micro, Atari 1040ST, Amiga 500's, 2000's,
3000 and 4000 and the
Pics of what I'm trying to find at
http://www.retrocomputing.net/parts/compugraphic/mcs_keyb/
Bought one w/o kb or monitor and managed to locate a few floppies for it. CP/M
86 was available from CG, but
I don't think there's much chance of ever finding that.
Even just a dump of the
The rounded corners may be more of an issue since unmodified Documation card
readers can't read them.
On 1/3/17 1:31 AM, jim stephens wrote:
> I don't personally care that there is a lot of crap printed on them, rather
> than the column indexes. The machines don't
> read that, and the top
wonder if its the code on bitsavers I got from a Symbolics backup tape
On 1/2/17 10:33 PM, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Appeared here:
>
> http://github.com/PDP-10/FOONEX
>
Josh Dersch wrote:
> Thought I'd share this fix with you all just in case someone in the
> future might make use of it.
There's no central repository for fixes like these?
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Jon Elson wrote:
(For reference, we were talking about my experiences with a Bendix G-15, not
an LGP-30.) So, I think the G-15 drum had a brass sleeve that might have
How should I know? Change the subject then!
Christian
Sorry for posting the National machine w/o an Ebay warning.
Anyway anyone that has a home keypunch will possibly be interested in
this guy.
I have ordered up a pile, as I doubt they will show up this cheap unless
someone takes it on themselves to manufacture them as the earlier
discussions
In a message dated 1/3/2017 1:09:50 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwsm...@jwsss.com writes:
On 1/2/2017 11:26 PM, Brad H wrote:
> I brought the RFI thing up with him. No response. There is a legit Rev
1 there too asking $3500. I don't find Apple IIs below Rev 0 that
interesting
On 1/3/17 12:09 AM, jim stephens wrote:
On 1/2/2017 11:26 PM, Brad H wrote:
I brought the RFI thing up with him. No response. There is a legit
Rev 1 there too asking $3500. I don't find Apple IIs below Rev 0
that interesting anymore, personally. I think even the legit guy
would
On 1/2/2017 11:26 PM, Brad H wrote:
I brought the RFI thing up with him. No response. There is a legit Rev 1
there too asking $3500. I don't find Apple IIs below Rev 0 that interesting
anymore, personally. I think even the legit guy would struggle to get much
above $1500.
The
43 matches
Mail list logo