> On Dec 16, 2017, at 7:59 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/2017 05:21 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>
>> So, some of us do not trust the labels on disks.
>
I don’t trust the labels on my floppies.
Especially those with with my handwriting.
On 12/16/2017 05:21 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> So, some of us do not trust the labels on disks.
Ha. I lost a bit of hair when I received a batch of 8" hard-sector
disks and tried to make sense of them. What were obviously sector
headers didn't line up at all with any of the sector
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Aaron Jackson via cctalk wrote:
The ones
labelled RT-11 don't actually have RT-11 on them, just some random
files, and these were the ones I had tried to boot from.
Yep.
Being labelled "RT-11" does not mean that they have RT-11 on them.
They could be Compupro disks from
> Anyone know of a 40-pin UART with a FIFO? :)
16c550s are cheap as dirt. And you can stick a 16c850 or whatever the
latest incarnation is to a PLCC to DIP adapter.
> I've lately been doing the data transfer stuff using STM32F407
> development boards.
Chuck really has the right answer here.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:15 PM, william degnan
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Chris Elmquist via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> On Friday (12/15/2017 at 07:57PM +), Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
>> >
>> > I have not yet had time to
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Chris Elmquist via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Friday (12/15/2017 at 07:57PM +), Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > I have not yet had time to build/test it, but a few months ago there
> > was an RL01/RL02 emulator project on VCF. You need
On Friday (12/15/2017 at 07:57PM +), Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
>
> I have not yet had time to build/test it, but a few months ago there
> was an RL01/RL02 emulator project on VCF. You need a PDP-11
> with RL11 controller. The RL0x emultor connects to the RL11
> just as an RL01/RL02 disk
Thanks for the tips! :)
Aaron.
allison via cctalk writes:
> If you have a system that can create/format SSSD (base RX01 media
> format) RT11 can
> reformat that as RX02. Of the top of my hear the command is INIT and
> you specify the
> drive and /double. It cannot format a blank disk but it can
If you have a system that can create/format SSSD (base RX01 media
format) RT11 can
reformat that as RX02. Of the top of my hear the command is INIT and
you specify the
drive and /double. It cannot format a blank disk but it can set a RX01
format to
double density.
Note a RX02 on a PDP-11 will
> From: Guy Sotomayor Jr
> I *really* want them and I'm within an hour (usually) of where they
> are. The problem is that right now I'm on a business trip until the end
> of the month and he needs this gone prior to 12/31.
Why don't you reach out to the person and tell them you
Glad to hear that you cleared that up.
For the other floppies.
1) DUMP/TERM/RAD50/END:0 DY1:
If you share the listing that will give us some hints as to the OS on the
floppies.
2) DIR/BAD DY1:
will do a bad block scan to see if can read all of the blocks on the media.
It
I just checked all of them in RT-11, out of 12 floppies, two of them
were bad, or at least I am unable to perform dir in RT-11.
My source of confusion comes from both A) not being able to boot from
any of them, and B) not being able to dump them using vtserver. The ones
labelled RT-11 don't
We've gotten around the formatting issue by formatting SSSD using ImageDisk
on a regular PC (with a floppy controller that supports single density/FM,
of course). If you want RX02 media there's an XXDP routine to upconvert
RX01s to RX02s.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chuck
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 4:04 AM, P Gebhardt via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> eBay: MEMOREX 3693-2 & 3690-2 Disc Drive Mainframe IBM 3370-2 VINTAGE
>>
>> No connection to the seller, but they mention it will be scrapped if no
>> takers. $150 Buy it now.
>>
On 12/16/2017 10:43 AM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Aaron Jackson via cctalk wrote:
>> Well, would you believe it. It was the disks after all. I can't believe
>> they are all bad!
>
> I can believe it.
> Were they "bad"?
> Or just not what they were labelled as being?
I
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Aaron Jackson via cctalk wrote:
Well, would you believe it. It was the disks after all. I can't believe
they are all bad!
I can believe it.
Were they "bad"?
Or just not what they were labelled as being?
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred ci...@xenosoft.com
> > From: Aaron Jackson
>
> > It was the disks after all.
>
> Well, I'm glad you got it working. Where'd you get a good floppy?
>
> Noel
Friend popped over with an RX02 drive and a working RT-11 floppy. The
drive worked with my controller so I tried the disk in my own drive and
it
> From: Aaron Jackson
> It was the disks after all.
Well, I'm glad you got it working. Where'd you get a good floppy?
Noel
Well, would you believe it. It was the disks after all. I can't believe
they are all bad!
Just booted straight into RT-11.
Thanks all for your help anyway. Time to play.
Aaron.
Aaron Jackson via cctalk writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I originally posted this on VCFed (which was new to me) but
19 matches
Mail list logo