> From: Paul Koning
>> On Dec 31, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk wrote:
>> ...
>> There are one or two bits in a register of the RK11 that have a
>> different meaning/function, depending on the controller being a -C or
>> -D.
> If someone can point me to
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Dec 31, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> There are one or two bits in a register of the RK11 that have a different
>> meaning/function, depending on the controller being a -C or -D. The RK11-C
>> was
I've had a lot of success using Adobe's Clearscan for OCR'ing old stuff.
Admittedly it's not perfect but it can improve the quality of an old
document a lot.
Kevin Parker
0418 815 527
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Paul Koning via
cctalk
Sent: Tuesday, 1 January 2019
On the other hand, just for the FUN of it,
can you write some software to find and fix (or simply flag) the most
common errors?
When I had to terminate my publisher, I was s'posed to receive a copy of
their customer database.
They deleted all delimiters (spaces, commas, periods, and other
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 7:13 PM, dwight via cctalk wrote:
>
> Fred is right, OCR is only worth it if the document is in perfect condition.
> I just finish getting an old 4004 listing working. I made only two mistakes
> on the 4K of code that were not the fault of the poorness of the listing.
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Henk Gooijen via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Fritz,
>
> One thought crossed my mind, probably not an issue, but you never know.
>
> You mentioned that you have an RK11-C, *not* RK11-D.
>
> There are one or two bits in a register of the RK11 that have a different
>
Fred is right, OCR is only worth it if the document is in perfect condition. I
just finish getting an old 4004 listing working. I made only two mistakes on
the 4K of code that were not the fault of the poorness of the listing. Twice I
put LDM instead of LD. LDM was the most commonly used.
There
> On Dec 30, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Nemo wrote:
>
> On 30/12/2018, Daniel Seagraves via cctalk wrote:
>>
>> New-era-internet term for illegally gaining access to someone's real world
>> “documents" (place of employment, home address, phone numbers, medical
>> records, family members’ info, etc)
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 6:32 PM Henk Gooijen via cctalk
wrote:
> One thought crossed my mind, probably not an issue, but you never know.
>
> You mentioned that you have an RK11-C, *not* RK11-D.
>
> There are one or two bits in a register of the RK11 that have a different
> meaning/function,
Hi Grant,
It can be different stroke for different folks. For many, it's the layout,
feel, and sound of the keyboard, joystick, buttons, etc. There is a huge
market for early "clicky" keyboards with non-linear actions (keys somewhat
resist pressure until a threshold is passed, then they allow
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 1:54 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> The standard idle pattern is in the data lights. I don't remember if the
> "fancy" pattern appeared in V7.0 or earlier, but in any case it's an
> undocumented SYSGEN option.
>
> In RSTS/E, the display register shows the system error
> On Dec 30, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some here may know I’ve been working on an 11/45 restoration off and on for
> some time now. My ’45 currently has floating point, KT11-C mem mgmt, 124
> kword MS11-L, and an RK11-C with one restored RK05
Resolution of photos seems low however.? Was this a set made at an
earlier time?
A useful reference though as most would never be able to collect up a
set of these.
We are thankful for what we have .Ed# SMECC
In a message dated 12/31/2018 10:12:47 AM US Mountain
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Larry Kraemer via cctalk wrote:
I used the libtiff-tools (Debian 8.x - 32 Bit) to extract all 61 .TIF's
from the Multipage .tif file. While the .tif's look descent, and
RasterVect shows the .tif properties to be Group 4 Fax (1bpp) with 5100
x 6600 pixels - 300 DPI, I
On 12/30/18 5:04 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> It might be helpful to state the policy (or choice, if any) explicitly so
> people know what to expect.
>
I will return documents if requested.
Originals may or may not be donated to CHM for archiving, depending on
if they are duplicative or are
On 12/31/18 5:20 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
> Are these currently online?
They are on bitsavers under afips for now
The intent/agreement when I gave IEEE my scans was they were to be hosted by
CHM,
but that hasn't happened yet.
They are also the entire volume, IEEE distributes them by
On 2018-12-31 7:20 AM, Larry Kraemer via cctalk wrote:
> I used the libtiff-tools (Debian 8.x - 32 Bit) to extract all 61 .TIF's
> from the
> Multipage .tif file. While the .tif's look descent, and RasterVect shows
> the
> .tif properties to be Group 4 Fax (1bpp) with 5100 x 6600 pixels - 300
I used the libtiff-tools (Debian 8.x - 32 Bit) to extract all 61 .TIF's
from the
Multipage .tif file. While the .tif's look descent, and RasterVect shows
the
.tif properties to be Group 4 Fax (1bpp) with 5100 x 6600 pixels - 300 DPI,
I can't get tesseract 3.x, TextBridge Classic 2.0, or Irfanview
At 03:10 AM 31/12/2018 -0600, you wrote:
>I know of one outside of Chicago that is as is. I might be ab;e to move it
>a state or two or help out with the arrangements. I know nothing about
>it, but I can text or email 2 pics.
>
>Paul
User manual:
I know of one outside of Chicago that is as is. I might be ab;e to move it
a state or two or help out with the arrangements. I know nothing about
it, but I can text or email 2 pics.
Paul
20 matches
Mail list logo
