The HP 16500 / 1660 / 1670 series which have hard drives use standard IDE
drives.
They might be slightly picky about which drives work. Any drive larger than
around 2GB might have some issues.
Why do you ask?
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 6:42 AM GerardCJAT via cctech
wrote:
> This equipment is said
I forgot that at some point they switched from 3.5-inch drives to
2.5-inch drives.
I just pulled the cover off my 1670E to check exactly what it has for
a hard drive. It is an IBM Travelstar model DBCA-203240, 3.2GB,
4200RPM, 2.5-Inch Hard Disk Drive with ATA/IDE Interface, with a date
code of
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 15:21 -0800, Chris Hanson via cctalk wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >
> > It did seem for a while that a lot of things were based on Mach,
> > but
> > >
> > > very few seemed to make it to market. NeXTstep
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 15:06 -0800, Chris Hanson via cctalk wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2020, at 12:56 AM, Jeffrey S. Worley via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> > Does Talingent Pink sound familiar? OS/2 was ported to powerPC,
> > and so
> > was Netware iirc. The field was quite busy with
I'll be in Chicago for a week soon for a work event. Limited time for
myself but I'll have some time Sunday to maybe Uber around. Any suggestions
or cool spots for a computer collector to hit?
I see a museum of broadcast communications is close to where I'll be which
may be neat. Not sure if
On 1/5/20 3:12 PM, Chris Hanson via cctalk wrote:
On Jan 5, 2020, at 7:02 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
wrote:
Sun *did* do a full port of OpenStep to Solaris, but while I know
people who saw it, I am not sure if it got a full commercial release.
Not quite! Sun was a participant in
On Jan 5, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
wrote:
>
> It did seem for a while that a lot of things were based on Mach, but
>>
>> very few seemed to make it to market. NeXTstep and OSF/1, the only
>> version of which to ship AFAIK was DEC OSF/1 AXP, later Digital UNIX,
>> later
On Jan 5, 2020, at 7:02 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
wrote:
> Sun *did* do a full port of OpenStep to Solaris, but while I know
> people who saw it, I am not sure if it got a full commercial release.
Not quite! Sun was a participant in creating the OpenStep standard (the NS
class prefix stands
On Jan 5, 2020, at 12:56 AM, Jeffrey S. Worley via cctalk
wrote:
> Does Talingent Pink sound familiar? OS/2 was ported to powerPC, and so
> was Netware iirc. The field was quite busy with hopeful Microsoft
> killers. OS/2 was to be morphed into a cross-platform o/s, to wean
> folks from
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 23:41 +0100, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 23:30, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes. We first started with Mach 3.0 build MK58. We did our final
> > fork at MK68. We made some *significant* changes from what CMU
> > had (things like
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 23:30, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Yes. We first started with Mach 3.0 build MK58. We did our final
> fork at MK68. We made some *significant* changes from what CMU
> had (things like changing mach messages from IPC to RPC) and a
> whole lot of work in the area of
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 21:54 +0100, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 19:02, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I had been working on the IBM Microkernel (was one of the original 6
> people onthat team). It was eventually to form the basis of OS/2 for
> PPC. The way
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Steven M Jones via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, the reference to "i810 RISC" should be the i860
> ("N-10"), their second general-purpose RISC design - versus the 960MX
> from the BiiN project with Siemens in the mid-80s as their first (?),
> which would become
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 19:02, Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I had been working on the IBM Microkernel (was one of the original 6
> people onthat team). It was eventually to form the basis of OS/2 for
> PPC. The way thatthe microkernel project was structured was that most
> of the "OS" was
On 01/05/2020 07:02, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
OS/2 was to be morphed into a cross-platform o/s,
>> to wean folks from dos/x86.
>
True, but what few remember now is that as well as OS/2 1 (80286) and
OS./2 2 (80386), there was also OS/2 3 (CPU-independent). It was
initially
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, Tapley, Mark B. via cctalk wrote:
All,
have not yet brought myself to throw away this big box of SCO software. Last
call, though.
I’ll pay media rate to get it to you in the US, just let me know that you want
it and where to ship it. If you are abroad, email me and we can
On Sun, 2020-01-05 at 03:56 -0500, Jeffrey S. Worley via cctalk wrote:
> A lot of odd PPC work happened in a group a friend worked for
> inAustin TX, but not sure if they did Netware work there.? There was
> a lot ofOS2 work there as well, but that's off track a bit more.
> thanksJim
> I was lead
This equipment is said to have an internal 2 Go HD.
Who knows what KIND of HD ?? HP SCSI ??
Thanks
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 09:56, Jeffrey S. Worley via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 12:00 -0600, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
> > On 1/2/2020 1:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
> > > > > Anyone done anything with Netware *for PowerPC*? Allegedly
> > > > > there was
> > > > >
On 1/5/2020 12:56 AM, Jeffrey S. Worley via cctalk wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 12:00 -0600, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
On 1/2/2020 1:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
Anyone done anything with Netware *for PowerPC*? Allegedly
there was
some attempt at Apple to put it on
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 12:00 -0600, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
> On 1/2/2020 1:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
> > > > Anyone done anything with Netware *for PowerPC*? Allegedly
> > > > there was
> > > > some attempt at Apple to put it on what later became the
> > > > Network
21 matches
Mail list logo
