Tony Aiuto wrote:
> It's a buffer overrun. sixbit_to_ascii writes 7 bytes. The extension was
> declared as 4. Changing to 7 is required.
Thanks, good catch!
Jim Carpenter wrote:
> If it makes you feel any better, I can't figure out how to get back10
> to extract all files. :) I have to give the file names to extract.
It does have some quirk. The names are matched exactly, or as regexp.
I think an '' empty string works, or maybe '.*'. And it's best t
> From: "Christian Brunschen"
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:45:11 +
> Subject: Re: [simh] recovering software for the MIT Whirlwind
> To: s...@groups.io
>
> https://www.historia-mollimercium.com/whirlwind/ww-page.html
> https://www.historia-mollimercium.com/whirlwind/Whirlwind-Software-Recovery-P
I sent a PR. https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/pdp10-its-disassembler/pull/71
>
It's a buffer overrun. sixbit_to_ascii writes 7 bytes. The extension was
declared as 4. Changing to 7 is required. I'm not sure if that is the only
fix yet. I have not had time for a detailed inspection.
- char ext[4];
+ char ext[7];
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:57 PM Peter Coghlan via cctalk
Tony Aiuto wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:48 PM Jim Carpenter wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:07 PM Tony Aiuto via cctalk
>> wrote:
>> > I think that is an artifact of the files being created with the wrong
>> names.
>> > For example, with tape 169249, after you skip the UFDs, tito -t prin
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:16 AM Tony Aiuto wrote:
> I'm building tito on a generic Debian linux (x86_64, debian 4.19, gcc 8.3.0)
> so I doubt this is a portability problem. I'll try again next weekend.
Linux jim-xubuntu 5.8.0-44-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 9 06:29:41
UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:16 AM Tony Aiuto via cctalk
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:48 PM Jim Carpenter
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:07 PM Tony Aiuto via cctalk
> > wrote:
> > > I think that is an artifact of the files being created with the wrong
> > names.
> > > For example, wi
RL01/02 units are pretty solid, the one thing to watch out for is make
sure the filter isn't plugged. Pull off the front, remove the filter,
and check it (and to make sure no mice things around it).
If the filter is plugged the heads can't get enough air to fly. Had this
happen, annoying.
On
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
I'm familiar with the various undelete tools for Windows and Linux.
Such tools may not exist or make sense for older file systems.
Windows/MS-DOS was certainly not unique nor original in marking file
primary directory entries (FPDE) as deleted,
On 3/8/21 11:03 AM, Zane Healy wrote:
What’s the likelihood of them being readable?
There shouldn't be any problems if they haven't been mishandled. I've probably
read
100 packs of similar age in the last 20 years. The only thing that deteriorates
is
the ring foam.
Like I said, I need to pop
On Mar 8, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 3/8/21 9:42 AM, Lee Gleason via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Did you notice this auction? Looks like not all of his RSX11D stuff is red
>> labelled. This one looks like it might hold a running system.
>
> yes, I saw it.
> i'm limiting mys
On 3/8/21 9:42 AM, Lee Gleason via cctalk wrote:
Did you notice this auction? Looks like not all of his RSX11D stuff is red
labelled. This one looks like it might hold a running system.
yes, I saw it.
i'm limiting myself to the source packs, i'm worried enough that those might
not be read
On 3/3/21 11:11 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
/On 3/3/21 10:42 AM, Lee Gleason via cctalk wrote: />>//>>>/ The auction starts at more than I have in my computer budget this
month />>/I went ahead and bought these, but paypal contributions to my email
would be helpful />>/this is way more th
On 2021-03-08 15:40, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 7, 2021, at 6:42 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2021-03-07 23:00, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:02 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2021-03-06 02:33, Paul Koning wrote:
...
Anyway, in RSX, when running DDCMP on the serial port,
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 11:48 PM Jim Carpenter
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 8:07 PM Tony Aiuto via cctalk
> wrote:
> > I think that is an artifact of the files being created with the wrong
> names.
> > For example, with tape 169249, after you skip the UFDs, tito -t prints
> >
> >(SYS)
At 03:16 AM 3/8/2021, Tor Arntsen via cctalk wrote:
>Linux distros come with a standard tool to do some of that,
>'testdisk'. From the overview:
I'm familiar with the various undelete tools for Windows and Linux.
Such tools may not exist or make sense for older file systems.
Entire files would
On 3/3/21 11:11 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 3/3/21 10:42 AM, Lee Gleason via cctalk wrote:
The auction starts at more than I have in my computer budget this month
I went ahead and bought these, but paypal contributions to my email would be
helpful
this is way more than I can afford
> On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:02 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-06 02:33, Paul Koning wrote:
> ...
>> The explanation I heard for the slow J-11 clock is that the original J-11
>> spec called for it to operate at 20 MHz. When Harris failed to deliver and
>> the max useable clock speed e
> On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:15 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>>> Can't run split I/D space on any version of P/OS. Neither does it support
>>> supervisor mode. Also, the J11 on the Pro-380 is running a bit on the slow
>>> side. Rather sad, but I guess they didn't want to improve the suppo
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 6:42 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021-03-07 23:00, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:02 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2021-03-06 02:33, Paul Koning wrote:
> ...
>>>
I would have liked better comms. The USART has such a tiny FIFO
On 2021-03-07 14:56, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:25 PM Wayne S via cctalk
> wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone from this list bidding on this.
>> If so i’ll back out. Just don’t want it to be “recycled “ and i have room
>> for it.
>>
>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Digital-DEC-BA23-L
On 2021-03-05 09:41, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
>
> This situation makes me hesitant to release disk images from the past.
> It's one thing to do it with disks that were mine and to take responsibility
> for my risk; it's another to release disks once owned and used by others.
> Do the unused se
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 15:41, John Foust via cctalk
wrote:
>
>
> After thinking about disk imaging tools like Greaseweasel,
> I started thinking about tools that would grab and examine the unused
> portions of disks.
>
> It's obviously file-system dependent. At one level we know of
> "undelete" to
24 matches
Mail list logo
