FANUC A860-0056-T020 Papertape Reader and DOSTEK 440A BTR
https://www.ebay.com/itm/274883740917
Ebay listing includes my project notes. Hopefully someone here will want
it.
Bill
On 8/2/21 5:53 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> He did say "in the 1960s" so it may have been an early one without the high
> quality optimizations that grew over time.
FTN was spawned during the 1960s. Bitsavers has the GIM from 1966:
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/cdc/cyber/lang/fortran/60176400_FTN_Extd
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:07 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
> One of the rites of passage (not necessarily the only one) in "computer
> science" education is that every grad student invents a new language, and
> writes a compiler. The compiler is not considered finished until the
> current itera
You are conflating the OS kernel with the developer A
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Liam Proven via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 04:21, Tony Aiuto via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> > I would argue that this is totally wrong. iOS,
>
> Which is a Unix. Derived from Mac
Some might argue with you about that. PL/M was done in Fortran IV.
A REAL programmer can write a FORTRAN program in any language.
A REAL programmer can write any program in FORTRAN. (although, it is
often the wrong tool for the job, possibly resulting in too much work and
poorer performance.)
On 8/2/21 4:47 PM, Dave Wade G4UGM via cctalk wrote:
Depending on what he was trying to do that may well be a valid
assessment. CDC Fortran was known to be pretty good, but Fortran is not
the obvious answer for implementing interpreters or other language
processors, which this sounds like.
On 8/2/21 4:42 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
Some might argue with you about that. PL/M was done in Fortran IV.
A REAL programmer can write a FORTRAN program in any language.
A REAL programmer can write any program in FORTRAN. (although, it is
> > Depending on what he was trying to do that may well be a valid
> assessment. CDC Fortran was known to be pretty good, but Fortran is not
> the obvious answer for implementing interpreters or other language
> processors, which this sounds like.
> >
>
> Some might argue with you about that.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
Some might argue with you about that. PL/M was done in Fortran IV.
A REAL programmer can write a FORTRAN program in any language.
A REAL programmer can write any program in FORTRAN. (although, it is
often the wrong tool for the job, poss
> On Aug 2, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 8/2/21 12:19 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>>> On Aug 2, 2021, at 11:11 AM, James Liu via cctech
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for feedback and offers to assist. I received the tape from
>>> one of the maintainers of
On 8/2/21 12:19 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 2, 2021, at 11:11 AM, James Liu via cctech wrote:
Thanks for feedback and offers to assist. I received the tape from
one of the maintainers of Schoonship at CERN, and it was probably made
around 1978 at SLAC.
For some background, Tin
> On Aug 2, 2021, at 11:11 AM, James Liu via cctech
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for feedback and offers to assist. I received the tape from
> one of the maintainers of Schoonship at CERN, and it was probably made
> around 1978 at SLAC.
>
> For some background, Tini Veltman developed Schoonship in t
Thanks for feedback and offers to assist. I received the tape from
one of the maintainers of Schoonship at CERN, and it was probably made
around 1978 at SLAC.
For some background, Tini Veltman developed Schoonship in the 1960's
at CERN on the CDC 6600. My understanding is that he more or less
in
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Zane Healy via
> cctalk
> Sent: 02 August 2021 04:24
> To: William Donzelli
> Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: Branching the thread away from Compaq deskpro boards: "What
> We Have Lost"
>
>
>
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
