On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 8:41 PM Mike Stein via cctalk
wrote:
> Conrac mainly made CRT monitor assemblies, so the actual terminal was quite
> possibly made by someone else.
>
> It looks vaguely familiar; I'm surprised no one's recognized it.
>
Yea. Looks vaguely SABER like, but my only experience
Conrac mainly made CRT monitor assemblies, so the actual terminal was quite
possibly made by someone else.
It looks vaguely familiar; I'm surprised no one's recognized it.
m
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:13 PM Brad H via cctalk
wrote:
> Thanks Rod!
>
> I discovered an immediate problem I hadn't
Hi Everybody.
It is important to keep everyone aware of phishing attempts, but it's also
important to make sure when you send warning emails to simply delete the
actual URL that the criminals provide so that nobody accidently clicks on
something...
Kind of like making sure that 400V capacitor
Okey Dokey Thanks.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 7:30 PM Paul Koning via cctalk
wrote:
> You should ignore it, just like all other criminal messages of that kind.
>
> paul
>
> > On Jul 6, 2023, at 7:16 PM, KenUnix via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> > Chuck,
> >
> > So what actions are we supposed to
You should ignore it, just like all other criminal messages of that kind.
paul
> On Jul 6, 2023, at 7:16 PM, KenUnix via cctalk wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> So what actions are we supposed to take??
>
> I was going to go to the cloudflair link but got a message that this was a
> dangerous
Chuck,
So what actions are we supposed to take??
I was going to go to the cloudflair link but got a message that this was a
dangerous site!
This link looks dangerous
This link opens a site that is likely to be harmful
Ken
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 6:39 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk
wrote:
> Just
I’ve just pressed the 2 broken end together and measured the resistance end to
end to get an idea of the resistance. Any old trimmer of suitable value should
work as a replacement as the vdu is probably not going to be in a harsh
environment anymore.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 6, 2023, at
I am going throw out a Jim Butterfield too
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 5:52 PM John Many Jars via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> More than anyone else (except maybe Gary Bitter) I owe my lifelong interest
> in computers to this man. How very sad. What a loss.
>
Thanks Rod!
I discovered an immediate problem I hadn't caught before.. two of the trimmer
resistors had actually been broken right off two of their legs.. so that may
account for strange/missing voltages. They are a CONRAC part 928237. The CRT
is CONRAC too, but I still don't think this is
I worked on VDU's as an engineer in the UK before joining DEC to sell
volume VT100's in 1975
There's a mention of block on one of the cards so a block mode terminal.
That means enter data and press a key to send the lot.
The card cage could mean its emulating something.
I'd test as many
More than anyone else (except maybe Gary Bitter) I owe my lifelong interest
in computers to this man. How very sad. What a loss.
Very nice writeup!
Marc
> On Jun 26, 2023, at 5:06 AM, Steve Lewis via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> VCF SW was this past weekend near Dallas, Texas.
>
> Here are some highlights from my perspective.
>
> https://voidstar.blog/vcf-southwest-2023/
>
>
> Most photos you can click to enlarge (Edge has
On 7/6/23 9:42 AM, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
Doesn't the list check addresses to see if the poster is a member?
This has never been a good test. It really only works to reject blatant
unwanted messages.
It's trivial to lie and say that a message is from someone that it is
not from. Both
Where are you located? There is a number of groups all over the range of
activities that hams do and in various social media.
Please free to email me off list if you want to get more info.
73 de Nigel ve3id
On 2023-07-06 12:33, Eric Moore via cctalk wrote:
If you are specifically into RTTY,
If you are specifically into RTTY, there is the greenkeys list. I am not a
ham, but I collect and repair teletypes, so I am active on there.
-Eric
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023, 11:30 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>
> I know this is off topic, but I think there are a
I know this is off topic, but I think there are a number of hams here.
Looking to get back into it but have some questions.
Now that the a**holes have completely trashed all the USENET ham radio
groups where do hams go for the kinds of discussions that used to be there?
bill
> I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list
> are
>
> now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see
> if
>
> the poster is a member?
In short: no. The spam filters on the list are antiquated at best
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 15:42, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list are
> now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see if
> the poster is a member?
I am hearing you loud and clear.
--
Liam Proven ~
I have a ham radio (in russian)
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 10:44 AM Adrian Stoness via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> i see u i hear u
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:42 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I doubt this will go thru either but other
i see u i hear u
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:42 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>
> I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list are
>
> now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see if
>
> the poster is a member?
>
I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list are
now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see if
the poster is a member?
bill
21 matches
Mail list logo
