>>[anyone know if there's a usable web interface to CCTALK? I browse it
>>through the ARCHIVE on CCTALK.COM
>KenUnix - 27 Nov 7:13 p.m.
>When I try and connect to it I see in the tab chinese verbiage
>CCtalk ???-?? and it tries to send me to
public.hujia.104.cdn20.com
Sorry,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 5:32 PM Rick Bensene via cctalk
wrote:
> Steve Lewis wrote:
> > then like the 4004, we're struggling to find evidence of actual products
> > that
> > made use of them. Wasn't the 4004 used in some cash registers, street
> > lights, or
> > some weighing machines? (I
Steve Lewis wrote:
> then like the 4004, we're struggling to find evidence of actual products that
> made use of them. Wasn't the 4004 used in some cash registers, street
> lights, or > some weighing machines? (I don't have any specific references,
> just recollections > from past reading)
When I try and connect to it I see in the tab chinese verbiage
CCtalk 丰富多元的综合内容平台-专业的知识分享与在线教育平台
and it tries to send me to public.hujia.104.cdn20.com
-Ken
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 1:44 AM Dave Dunfield via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >26 Nov 8:14 p.m.
>
> >I was trying to format
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 1:13 PM Steve Lewis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Yes, it seems PALM did have a few evolutions, which just makes me curious
> if there were even earlier editions than this one from 1972.But even if
> so - then like the 4004, we're struggling to find
Yes, it seems PALM did have a few evolutions, which just makes me curious
if there were even earlier editions than this one from 1972.But even if
so - then like the 4004, we're struggling to find evidence of actual
products that made use of them. Wasn't the 4004 used in some cash
registers,
Well, just to throw this into the conversation:
Over this past summer, I was studying the SCAMP (
https://voidstar.blog/scamp-a-review-50-years-later/ )
In that collection I came across a very early printing of the PALM
instruction set, with the cover page dated March 21, 1972 of the printing,
