On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 22:54, Doc Shipley via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Liam, don't be a d**k.
I am sorry. :-(
I did not think that calling out a bogus claim was a nasty thing to
do, but I sit corrected, and I apologise.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~
Thank you for all the responses to my query - they're really helpful.
I'm usually pretty handy with Google but must have lost the plot this day -
I was trying "pmg5 build" - doh.
Kevin Parker
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Parker via cctalk
Sent: Monday, 10 October 2022 17:15
To:
Why would a paid link come up when searching for something vintage
computery? The results are not tailored to suit the searcher, but the
advertisers, regardless of the search terms. Hence: trash. And you're not
going to convince me otherwise. Google is the Deathstar of the internet.
Sellam
On
On 2022-10-10 5:01 p.m., Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
I blame Google: it's complete trash now.
Sellam
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:40 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
4 words is not "Google-fu".
Sometimes
On 10/10/22 5:47 PM, Stuff Received via cctalk wrote:
Indeed. Also, I have added more words and received more search
results. One would expect the opposite.
Google also tailors results to location and cookies. (I always search
in private mode.) Not what it once was...(Sigh)
Agreed all
On 2022-10-10 17:39, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
4 words is not "Google-fu".
Sometimes knowing /which/ /words/ to search for is the problem.
Indeed. Also, I have added more words and received more search
results. One would expect the
I blame Google: it's complete trash now.
Sellam
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:40 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> > 4 words is not "Google-fu".
>
> Sometimes knowing /which/ /words/ to search for is the problem.
>
>
On 10/10/22 10:33 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
4 words is not "Google-fu".
Sometimes knowing /which/ /words/ to search for is the problem.
I've also seen Google return extremely different search results for
different people.
Let's assume good intention and benign mistake. No need to
On 10/10/22 11:33, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 08:20, Kevin Parker via cctalk
wrote:
Problem is my GoogleFoo can't find any diagrams, illustrations etc on how
the internals are put together
What? I am *amazed*. I don't know how you could _not_ find the info.
There
> TenFourFox is essentially a current web-browser.
It's kind of you to say that, but at its core it's still just a hopped-up
Firefox 45. Many things work, many things work but look funny, and an
increasing proportion of things don't work at all. I myself just use it for
basic tasks now that I'm
A few more useful sites:
https://tim.id.au/laptops/apple/powermac/powermac_g5.pdf
This one includes official Apple “take-apart procedures"
http://resale.headgap.com
Parts and components, in case you actually are missing something in their
catalog. Satisfied customer, no other relation.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 08:20, Kevin Parker via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Problem is my GoogleFoo can't find any diagrams, illustrations etc on how
> the internals are put together
What? I am *amazed*. I don't know how you could _not_ find the info.
There is loads of it.
This is the first hit on "apple
12 matches
Mail list logo
