[cctalk] Re: Is the list broken again?

2023-07-06 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
On 7/6/23 9:42 AM, Bill Gunshannon wrote: Doesn't the list check addresses to see if the poster is a member? This has never been a good test. It really only works to reject blatant unwanted messages. It's trivial to lie and say that a message is from someone that it is not from. Both

[cctalk] Re: Is the list broken again?

2023-07-06 Thread Ali via cctalk
> I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list > are > > now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see > if > > the poster is a member? In short: no. The spam filters on the list are antiquated at best

[cctalk] Re: Is the list broken again?

2023-07-06 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 15:42, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote: > > I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list are > now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see if > the poster is a member? I am hearing you loud and clear. -- Liam Proven ~

[cctalk] Re: Is the list broken again?

2023-07-06 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
I have a ham radio (in russian) On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 10:44 AM Adrian Stoness via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > i see u i hear u > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:42 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > > > > I doubt this will go thru either but other

[cctalk] Re: Is the list broken again?

2023-07-06 Thread Adrian Stoness via cctalk
i see u i hear u On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:42 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > I doubt this will go thru either but other attempts to send to the list are > > now getting rejected as SPAM. Doesn't the list check addresses to see if > > the poster is a member? >