On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:07 PM W2HX via cctalk wrote:
> 1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the dec rx02
> drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a card where DEC had
> perfectly good working ones? Anyone know if there is any value in keeping the
>
Thanks everyone!
73 Eugene W2HX
My Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@w2hx/videos
-Original Message-
From: Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 12:37 AM
To: Glen Slick via cctalk
Cc: Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez
Subject: [cctalk] Re: PDP-11 thingy
W2HX
My Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@w2hx/videos
-Original Message-
From: Glen Slick via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 7:44 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Cc: Glen Slick
Subject: [cctalk] Re: PDP-11 thingy. What is it?
On Wed, Apr 10
Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, 7:22 PM Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
Jonathan Chapman via cctalk wrote:
1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the
dec rx02 drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, 7:22 PM Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Jonathan Chapman via cctalk wrote:
> >> 1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the
> dec rx02 drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a card where
> DEC had
Jonathan Chapman via cctalk wrote:
1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the dec rx02
drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a card where DEC had
perfectly good working ones? Anyone know if there is any value in keeping the
FC-202 or just keep with the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:35 PM Jonathan Chapman via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> > 1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the dec
> rx02 drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a card where DEC
> had perfectly good working ones? Anyone know if
> 1. I have read that the card and the drives were compatible with the dec rx02
> drives. Why would the CRDS even bother to redesign a card where DEC had
> perfectly good working ones? Anyone know if there is any value in keeping the
> FC-202 or just keep with the DEC cards?
A lot of the
-Original Message-
From: Glen Slick via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 7:44 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Cc: Glen Slick
Subject: [cctalk] Re: PDP-11 thingy. What is it?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, 4:14 PM W2HX via cctalk wrote:
> Hi all, I picked up this
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, 4:14 PM W2HX via cctalk wrote:
> Hi all, I picked up this PDP-11 thing. Can anyone help me understand what
> it is?
> Pictures are here:
> https://w2hx.com/?prefix=x/What-Is-It/PDP-11-Thing/
>
> I could not find any designation on the backplane. It is a wire-wrappable
>
The backplane says that it is for a PDP-11/03
The chassis is missing the power supply.
The M8189 is a PDP-11/23+ KDF11-B PDP-11 CPU
The FC202 is a Charles River Data Floppy Diskette board
https://shop-pdp.net/~stuff/Pictures/index.php?dslct=/CRDS_FC-202_Floppy_Disk_Controller=0=0=0
On Wed, Apr
11 matches
Mail list logo
