You are conflating the OS kernel with the developer A
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Liam Proven via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 04:21, Tony Aiuto via cctalk
> wrote:
> >
> > I would argue that this is totally wrong. iOS,
>
> Which is a Unix. Derived from Mac
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Zane Healy via
> cctalk
> Sent: 02 August 2021 04:24
> To: William Donzelli
> Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: Branching the thread away from Compaq deskpro boar
> On Aug 1, 2021, at 5:51 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>
>> z/OS runs on IBM Mainframes, there is also “IBM i”, which was previously
>> called OS/400.
>>
>> Last I checked, GCOS-8 is still running, but with Itanium end-of-life, I’m
>> not sure what on. It’s been a niche market for decades.
On 2021-08-01 1:14 p.m., Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 1, 2021, at 7:10 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
wrote:
CP/M is surprisingly alive for something so old and rudimentary and
seeing some activity, e.g. CPMish, but I don't think anyone would
claim it has much of a future. CCP/M is dead a
> And that like IBM still being able to run S/360 programs Unisys 2200
> can still run Univac 1100 programs.
And that MCP and OS2200 put everyone else to shame in the security arena...
Because they thought about it back in the 1960s.
--
Will
On 8/1/21 8:51 PM, William Donzelli via cctalk wrote:
z/OS runs on IBM Mainframes, there is also “IBM i”, which was previously called
OS/400.
Last I checked, GCOS-8 is still running, but with Itanium end-of-life, I’m not
sure what on. It’s been a niche market for decades. I’d argue that it w
> z/OS runs on IBM Mainframes, there is also “IBM i”, which was previously
> called OS/400.
>
> Last I checked, GCOS-8 is still running, but with Itanium end-of-life, I’m
> not sure what on. It’s been a niche market for decades. I’d argue that it
> was a serious niche when I was using it in th
On 8/1/21 11:45 AM, brainded ben via cctalk wrote:
I suspect if they had the proper virtual memory, it would have been picked
up as a Unix cpu
Pull your head out of your ass. Unisoft had a very profitable business porting
Unix to 68000 computers (note, NOT 68010) The Apple Lisa's 68000 ran Uni
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
Would the 68K have succeeded if it were not for Apple and Commodore?
Without your engineering expertise, I would still say, "YES".
(I was reading Infoworld, etc., as compared to you designing the machines)
Before we heard anything about Apple
On 8/1/21 11:45 AM, ben via cctalk wrote:
> I suspect if they had the proper virtual memory, it would have been picked
> up as a Unix cpu, instead. It is the only common non segemented 16 bit
> cpu I can think in that time frame.
There were ways around that. You could run two, with one slightly
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of ben via cctalk
> Sent: 01 August 2021 19:46
> To: cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Branching the thread away from Compaq deskpro boards: "What
> We Have Lost"
>
> On 2021-08-01 12:32 p.m., Chuck Gu
> On Aug 1, 2021, at 2:45 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-01 12:32 p.m., Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Would the 68K have succeeded if it were not for Apple and Commodore?
>> --Chuck
> I suspect if they had the proper virtual memory, it would have been picked
> up as a Unix cpu,
On 2021-08-01 12:32 p.m., Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
Would the 68K have succeeded if it were not for Apple and Commodore?
--Chuck
I suspect if they had the proper virtual memory, it would have been picked
up as a Unix cpu, instead. It is the only common non segemented 16 bit
cpu I can thin
On 8/1/21 10:52 AM, ben via cctalk wrote:
> On 2021-08-01 11:17 a.m., Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>
>> The lack of interest in the classic/vintage computing segments is a bit
>> surprising, since many of these MCUs far exceed the computing power of
>> many legacy platforms.
>>
>> Silicon is chea
On 2021-08-01 11:17 a.m., Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
The lack of interest in the classic/vintage computing segments is a bit
surprising, since many of these MCUs far exceed the computing power of
many legacy platforms.
Silicon is cheap.
Only with good marketing, and lucky designs like the
On 8/1/21 9:14 AM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2021, at 7:10 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
> wrote:
>> CP/M is surprisingly alive for something so old and rudimentary and
>> seeing some activity, e.g. CPMish, but I don't think anyone would
>> claim it has much of a future. CCP/M is dead
On Aug 1, 2021, at 7:10 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk
wrote:
> CP/M is surprisingly alive for something so old and rudimentary and
> seeing some activity, e.g. CPMish, but I don't think anyone would
> claim it has much of a future. CCP/M is dead although I think Toshiba
> just about supports 4680 an
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 04:21, Tony Aiuto via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I would argue that this is totally wrong. iOS,
Which is a Unix. Derived from Mac OS X, which is an Open Group certified UNIX™.
> Android
A Linux distro.
> and other mobile
> systems,
QNX as in Blackberry 10? A Unix.
Jolla Sailfish
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 9:21 PM Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 7/27/21 4:27 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> > This was a talk at a recent Chaos Computer Club congress:
> > https://media.ccc.de/v/rc3-525180-what_have_we_lost#t=1707
> >
> > « We have ended up in a w
On 7/27/21 4:27 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
This was a talk at a recent Chaos Computer Club congress:
https://media.ccc.de/v/rc3-525180-what_have_we_lost#t=1707
« We have ended up in a world where UNIX and Windows have taken over,
and most people have never experienced anything else. Ove
This was a talk at a recent Chaos Computer Club congress:
https://media.ccc.de/v/rc3-525180-what_have_we_lost#t=1707
«
We have ended up in a world where UNIX and Windows have taken over,
and most people have never experienced anything else. Over the years,
though, many other system designs have co
21 matches
Mail list logo
