Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
Were the brackets on the 1700 cordwood modules shorter than the 6000 series? I've got a switch module here in a desk drawer--it's a 3-position switch labeled A O C and is illuminated with a couple of reed relays on the PCB. PCB size is the same as 6000, as is the connector, but bracket is

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/29/18 12:34 PM, William Donzelli wrote: > I think the Cyber 70s used the later modules (the multilayer and/or IC > things). Nope, the Cyber 70s were very minor upgrades to the 6000 series. A bunch of QSEs were made standard features, such as CMU (lower Cyber), CEJ, ILR, etc. Same

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread William Donzelli via cctalk
I think the Cyber 70s used the later modules (the multilayer and/or IC things). -- Will On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:06 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: > > On 12/29/18 10:47 AM, William Donzelli via cctalk wrote: > > Statistically, it is more likely to be a 1700 module (a more common > >

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/29/18 10:47 AM, William Donzelli via cctalk wrote: > Statistically, it is more likely to be a 1700 module (a more common > machine). The front bracket is missing, which is the easy way to > distinguish the two types. Don't know what the 1700 count was, but each 6600 had about 6,000

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread William Donzelli via cctalk
Don't let the (very few) online pictures of early 1700s (1704 and 1706) fool you - the things have a *lot* of modules when the options are added. It might be that while the 6000 series followed the Cray "simple/fewer" design philosophy, the 1700 line may not have. -- Will On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/29/18 10:47 AM, William Donzelli via cctalk wrote: > Statistically, it is more likely to be a 1700 module (a more common > machine). The front bracket is missing, which is the easy way to > distinguish the two types. That's an interesting observation, but I'm not sure I'd agree with you.

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-29 Thread William Donzelli via cctalk
Statistically, it is more likely to be a 1700 module (a more common machine). The front bracket is missing, which is the easy way to distinguish the two types. -- Will On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 6:10 PM Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > > The second one is a 6000 mainframe "cordwood" module. It

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-28 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/28/18 12:42 PM, Peter Van Peborgh via cctech wrote: > Gentlemen of advanced years who can remember CDC, cradle of Cray. > > Can you tell me which CDC computer type these three boards belonged to? It > is for labeling purposes in my personal museum. > > https://postimg.cc/crJHv3Lt >

CDC transistor boards

2018-12-28 Thread Peter Van Peborgh via cctalk
Gentlemen of advanced years who can remember CDC, cradle of Cray. Can you tell me which CDC computer type these three boards belonged to? It is for labeling purposes in my personal museum. https://postimg.cc/crJHv3Lt https://postimg.cc/Z0HnYH4h https://postimg.cc/6TtTNgs0 I am sure this will

Re: CDC transistor boards

2018-12-28 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
The second one is a 6000 mainframe "cordwood" module. It should have a two-letter module type code on the front. The third looks like small bits cut from such a cordwood module (my wife has some earrings made that way) but it may be they are actually complete items. If so, I don't recognize