On 05/23/2017 11:55 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:
The Wikipedia article on Dr. Wetterhahn seems to indicate
this went a lot slower than we were told in the seminar.
Not sure who to trust, there.
The NEJM article seems to say it was also not a precipitous decline.
OK, then I guess the
> Metallic mercury isn't anything you want to ingest, but it won't go thru
> your skin unless it has some other compound to drag it,
This isn't quite true. Elemental liquid mercury will pass through skin but
at a much slower rate. Vapourized elemental mercury via inhalation is, uh,
more
On 5/23/2017 5:56 PM, William Sudbrink via cctalk wrote:
Mercury
"bouncing around" in her body for almost a year before she finally passed.
It also "went through" the back of her hand without making some awful
lesion. 1.3 grams?! I've always gone with the mental crutch that a paper
clip
> The Wikipedia article on Dr. Wetterhahn seems to indicate
> this went a lot slower than we were told in the seminar.
> Not sure who to trust, there.
The NEJM article seems to say it was also not a precipitous decline.
--
personal:
On 05/23/2017 01:57 PM, William Sudbrink via cctalk wrote:
I have a hard time getting my head around Dr. Wetterhahn's poisoning. How
many molecules of the toxin could have possibly entered her body?
How many molecules does it take to kill or fatally disable a cell? After it
does its damage,
Thanks for the reply. I would never dream of "messing with it." Even
reading the NEJM article, it still amazes me to think of the Mercury
"bouncing around" in her body for almost a year before she finally passed.
It also "went through" the back of her hand without making some awful
lesion. 1.3
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Wetterhahn
> > http://i.imgur.com/0dXdc.jpg
> >
> > Karen Wetterhahn spilled a drop of a Mercury compound on her latex
> > glove, and died of it 10 months later.
>
> I have a hard time getting my head around Dr. Wetterhahn's poisoning. How
> many
On Behalf Of Tapley,
Mark via cctalk
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:30 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: OT: Mercury (Was: BBS software for the PDP 11)
On May 22, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> ...I'm not sure if
On May 22, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
wrote:
> ...I'm not sure if "mercury" batteries contain metallic mercury or mercury
> salts. Metallic mercury is actually pretty much harmless, even though
> bringing a thermometer into a US school can cause a major
> On May 22, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Christian Groessler via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> At least here in the EU, they banned mercury batteries, mostly used by old
> photo gear, and then supported light bulbs containing mercury.
>
> How many people will need and by these batteries
At least here in the EU, they banned mercury batteries, mostly used by
old photo gear, and then supported light bulbs containing mercury.
How many people will need and by these batteries and how many people
need and buy light bulbs?
Go figure...
regards,
chris
On 05/22/17 15:20, Bill
11 matches
Mail list logo