Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

Fantastic idea. I don't know how if it would work with our small community, but when it comes to contemporary programming, it works wonders. There is most always someone that has a solution for the most arcane language syntax or compiler bug out there. I'll be joining. Marc > On Jan 15, 2016,

Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great platform. As of right now it needs 11 more people following it (and more questions). tnx. g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Brownlee wrote: On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great platform. As of right now it needs 11 more

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote: > > http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing > > I think this is actually a pretty good idea and StackExchange is a great > platform. > > As of right now it needs 11 more people following it (and more

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

Ah, old eyes! I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock Excahange". So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here? Just curious, Chuck

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:12 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > Ah, old eyes! > > I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock > Excahange". > > So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here? > > Just curious, > Chuck Well, collecting Bunker-Ramo stuff as an objective would be

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote: > >> I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock >> exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data >> services? > > Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I think that CHM has a

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On Jan 15, 2016 7:58 PM, "Chuck Guzis" wrote: > > On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote: > >> I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock >> exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data >> services? > > > Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I

RE: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

> -Original Message- > From: cctech [mailto:cctech-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Charles > Anthony > Sent: 15 January 2016 16:58 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts <cct...@classiccmp.org> > Subject: Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange... > > O

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:22 AM, geneb wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Brownlee wrote: > > On 15 January 2016 at 13:50, geneb wrote: >> >>> >>> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/94441/retro-computing >>> >>> I think this is actually a pretty

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote: > > On 2016-Jan-15, at 4:12 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: > > Ah, old eyes! > > > > I originally read the title of the thread as "Retrocomputing on Stock > Excahange". > > > > So, does anyone collect Bunker-Ramo gear here? > > > >

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On 01/15/2016 07:36 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote: In Italy even: http://www.ebay.it/itm/Vintage-Bunker-Ramo-Corp-Telequote-III-Display-Station-Assembly-549211-Manual-/161829917688 I wonder if my modem may have been part of a Telequote installation. There wasn't a whole lot in the display

Re: Retrocomputing on StackExchange...

On 01/15/2016 04:34 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote: I'm guessing: are you mentioning BR here in relation to stock exchanges - were they a major supplier for stock exchange data services? Oh yes--look up "Telequote". I think that CHM has a few bits as well. A lot of caselaw was tied up in