[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 5/11/23 00:53, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: Odd fault on my Rev D KIM-1 popped up while writing code this afternoon (initially I thought I had a bug in my paper tape transmitter) - between $0280 and $029f, the upper 5 bits are stuck at zero. The rest of the address range seems fine. In par

[cctalk] OT: A list member in Japan?

2023-05-11 Thread William Sudbrink via cctalk
Is there a list member in Japan or soon traveling to Japan? I want to acquire something (not really vintage computer related) and the seller does not take paypal and I can't get funds to them. Thanks, Bill Sudbrink -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. ww

[cctalk] Re: OT: A list member in Japan?

2023-05-11 Thread Tony Jones via cctalk
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 8:47 AM William Sudbrink via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Is there a list member in Japan or soon traveling to Japan? I want to > acquire something (not really vintage computer related) and the seller does > not take paypal and I can't get funds to them. > Can

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
>> Odd fault on my Rev D KIM-1 popped up while writing code this afternoon >> (initially I thought I had a bug in my paper tape transmitter) - between >> $0280 >> and $029f, the upper 5 bits are stuck at zero. The rest of the address range >> seems fine. In particular, $0080-$009f, $0180-$019f and

[cctalk] Are there any useful OCR programs for scanning old listings and producing text with proper formatting

2023-05-11 Thread Marc Howard via cctalk
Marc Howard [image: Attachments]May 10, 2023, 8:58 PM (15 hours ago) to cctalk-owner I have some listings I want to convert to ASCII. They're line printer output from a computer that existed from the mid-sixties to the early 70's (Agage AGT series). I can't find any OCR package that can take sca

[cctalk] Re: Are there any useful OCR programs for scanning old listings and producing text with proper formatting

2023-05-11 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 11, 2023, at 12:12 PM, Marc Howard via cctalk > wrote: > > Marc Howard > [image: Attachments]May 10, 2023, 8:58 PM (15 hours ago) > to cctalk-owner > I have some listings I want to convert to ASCII. They're line printer > output from a computer that existed from the mid-sixties to

[cctalk] Did Intel's Insite User Program Library survive?

2023-05-11 Thread Veit, Holger via cctalk
Hi all, The PDF at https://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/intel/insite/1983_Insite_Users_Program_Library_Catalog.pdf lists various old user submitted software which could have been ordered from Intel those days. Is there anything of that archived and downloadable somewhere? Regards Holger

[cctalk] Re: Did Intel's Insite User Program Library survive?

2023-05-11 Thread Lee Courtney via cctalk
Holt, You might ask the Intel Museum - contact info at the bottom of the web page here: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/company-overview/intel-museum.html When I was at Intel there was a small but active team in Folsom that was archiving software, IP, and other material for preservation.

[cctalk] Re: Did Intel's Insite User Program Library survive?

2023-05-11 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/11/23 14:54, Veit, Holger via cctalk wrote: > Hi all, > > The PDF at > https://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/intel/insite/1983_Insite_Users_Program_Library_Catalog.pdf > lists various old user submitted software which could have been ordered from > Intel those days. > > Is there anything of that a

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> I thought about this, but the KIM is a pretty simple system. The only memory > mapped device in that range (really, on the entire unit) are the RIOTs, and > their RAM at $1780 is fine and does not echo. > > The KIM only does address decoding for 8K and echoes the rest, so the same > fault is map

[cctalk] Re: KIM-1 stuck bits from $280 to $29f

2023-05-11 Thread Brent Hilpert via cctalk
On 2023-May-11, at 7:41 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote: > it's actually an artifact of the monitor that the upper 6 were clear. > Actually, > the stuck bit is entirely bit 2 (i.e., it goes > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f > 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 8 9 a b 8 9 a b > > and the high nybble is OK).