ours is visible on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/simski/15171396948/
On 19-07-15 00:00, Rod Smallwood wrote:
Hi
I am working on an 8/f version. Its not far along enough to send out
just yet .
Rod
On 18/07/2015 12:34, simon wrote:
Hi Rod, that sounds like a good idea. we have a
So, tony, if I'm correct, you just called bullshit, right?
I assume this relates to my comments on static damage of PDP11 PSUs,
I am not sure I would quite put it that way (not on a public list :-)) but (a)
I have never seen a DEC
PSU (in a PDP11 or elsewhere) damaged by static, certainly
Oh, they are merely scratches from the key. We decided to keep the
labels for history's sake
and yes the printset is in good condition, but not better than te scans
available on bitsavers.
On 19-07-15 12:38, Rod Smallwood wrote:
Hi Simon
Yes thats what I am working on right now.
I can see
So my house sold yesterday after 3 days on the market (the market here is
nuts).
I have about two months to move, so a bunch of stuff has to disappear.
Location is the Vancouver, BC, Canada region (Port Moody more precisely).
Most of this stuff is larger and I'm not going to have a lot of time
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, tony duell wrote:
Perhaps. But not all of it, certainly. I'm currently four for four
fixing dead flatscreens by re-capping their power supplies; I imagine
others have similar experiences. It's not a huge stretch to imagine
This could be taken to show that modern
(On Sunday, July 19, 2015 4:14 AM, simon sim...@dds.nl wrote:)
ours is visible on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/simski/15171396948/
Nice. That's identical to the 8m panels I have, except the the 'f' instead of
the 'm'. I like the separation of the LED rows on these panels.
Dave
That seems to be the case, logo apart , f and m seem to be the same
On 19/07/2015 15:55, Dave wrote:
(On Sunday, July 19, 2015 4:14 AM, simon sim...@dds.nl wrote:)
ours is visible on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/simski/15171396948/
Nice. That's identical to the 8m panels I
I have rarely seen static damage to electronic parts. I can imagine
that if I were in Nevada during winter time, I might see more. There
were times when, even with a key to be the discharge point that
my arm still jumped.
Be careful, static daamge does not always show up at the time. You
SUN I or II board?
On 7/18/15 10:50 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Is anyone aware of any published detailed designs of Multibus
arbitration circuitry
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:01 PM, N0body H0me n0body.h...@inbox.com wrote:
A quick search on the Site Which Must Not Be Named shows
some NOS 8289's for about $7 each, including postage. I dunno,
just sayin-- why re-invent the wheel?
1. The 8289, being bipolar, draws an absurd amount of
Well, all I can say is that my experience differs. I have had newer capacitors
fail, and old ones, too, of course, but nothing points to wholesale replacement
as a cost or time effective strategy, especially on something like an Altair.
FWIW, I don't run my vintage machines all that often.
On 7/19/2015 2:43 PM, Armin Diehl wrote:
Yes, that is all correct. The first machines used by Basic Four (later
MAI) were Microdata machines. Basic Four released BB1 (Business Basic
Level 1) and BB2 on these machines. These were the “blue” ones, e.g.
Yes, that is all correct. The first machines used by Basic Four (later
MAI) were Microdata machines. Basic Four released BB1 (Business Basic
Level 1) and BB2 on these machines. These were the “blue” ones, e.g.
http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/mai-basic-four-model-1200
Schematics
I'm doing another run of boards.
The description of the board changes and the expected price are at:
http://www.pdp8online.com/mfm/board_revb.shtml
If you desire any please respond by email not to list with
1) How many bare boards you wish. I will assume production boards unless
you state
I have rarely seen static damage to electronic parts. I can imagine
that if I were in Nevada during winter time, I might see more. There
were times when, even with a key to be the discharge point that
my arm still jumped.
On parts, the ones I've seen that I could definitely attribute to static
15 matches
Mail list logo