Re: Harris VOS question

On 02/18/2017 08:15 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > Does the Harris use a 24 bit word? Yes, it does, which is why I suspected it. But some real-world knowledge would help. --Chuck

DATARAM DR-118 docs?

Hi folks, Looking for documentation on the DATARAM DR-118 16Kx12 core memory for PDP-8/e. I have the documentation on the DR-118A which is for the PDP-8/a. It is probably similar, but would love to find the right version. Anyone have such thing? Thanks Eugene

Re: Harris VOS question

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017, Chuck Guzis wrote: I'm looking at what I suspect is a labeled Harris VOS (Vulcan) tape. Is it the case that the Harris minis are incapable of writing tape records that aren't a multiple of 3 bytes in length? The reason I ask is that the VOL HDR, etc. records all seem to be

Wanted: Amiga 1000 hard drive

Anyone have an Amiga 1000 hard drive that they want to sell?

Harris VOS question

I'm looking at what I suspect is a labeled Harris VOS (Vulcan) tape. Is it the case that the Harris minis are incapable of writing tape records that aren't a multiple of 3 bytes in length? The reason I ask is that the VOL HDR, etc. records all seem to be 81 bytes in length. All other records on

Re: Reading PALs

On 2/18/2017 7:37 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: If I'm the person (see my blog on vcfed.org), "reading" isn't exactly the right term. Yes, of course. I meant running through the combinations of the inputs on the PAL and obtaining the outputs for each set of inputs, then attempting to minimize the

Re: Reading PALs

On 02/18/2017 04:22 PM, Jim Brain wrote: > Seems like someone on list was willing and able to read PAL16L8s and > give a try to some PAL16R4s... Is that person still on list and > still interested? If so, please contact me off-list. > > I am trying to restore some C64 carts, and the PAL on my

Reading PALs

Seems like someone on list was willing and able to read PAL16L8s and give a try to some PAL16R4s... Is that person still on list and still interested? If so, please contact me off-list. I am trying to restore some C64 carts, and the PAL on my working unit is protected, so I cannot

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

> From: Al Kossow > PDF-A Sorry, what's the issue with PDF/A? Since it's supposedly the 'archival' version, that's what I asked for; I wanted to maximize the lifetime of these things. What version of PDF should I be asking for? (I'm not doing the PDF'ing. The person who is is using

Re: PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 02/18/2017 11:24 AM, couryho...@aol.com wrote: > > Adobe claims " PDF/A – the ISO standard for long-term archiving" > > -I am confused about all the versions etc.. > -which are good which are bad? > -are there good programs for opening hesitant to open pdf file? > - what is a

PDF PDF Which is right and which is ... Was Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

Adobe claims " PDF/A – the ISO standard for long-term archiving" -I am confused about all the versions etc.. -which are good which are bad? -are there good programs for opening hesitant to open pdf file? - what is a goodfreeware PDF generator? / modifier? - are older

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2/18/2017 10:29 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Rosenbloom Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

-Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bob Rosenbloom Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:24 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: >>

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote: -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version PDF-A which is the reason it's not on

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

>-Original Message- >From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow >Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM >To: cctalk@classiccmp.org >Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version > >PDF-A > >which is the reason it's not on bitsavers Thank you Al. It's not

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

PDF-A which is the reason it's not on bitsavers On 2/18/17 9:48 AM, Toby Thain wrote: > On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote: >> Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. >> In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so >> that it's

Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

On 2017-02-18 12:44 PM, Paul Birkel wrote: Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so that it's searchable? Unlocked?!?!?!?! Sounds like yet another reason to publish multipage TIFF instead of or

RE: PDP-11/24 CPU later version

Thanks for scanning this! No sign that Al has done-his-bit :-<. In the meantime is it possible to get an unlocked copy that I can OCR so that it's searchable? Should I infer that you purchased that $399 load of DEC modules? I debated, what with the J11 processor, but no FP-coprocessor and no

Box of old books

Wow from 2013 > I've put together a small box of old TTL books, computer references > of all sorts that I simply do not want anymore. If someone really > wants to collect old databooks instead of me sending this stuff out > to pulp let me know. It would be easiest if someone local to me here

Re: How I came to vintage computers

Fun read. I'd write my own story but it is much less exiting. Maybe some day you'll tell us about kiel and the PDP-10. /P On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Philipp Hachtmann wrote: > Hey folks, > > after my OmniUSB-thread has gone down the teleprinter way... I'll start a > new thread.