Re: XKCD on what we're doing

2017-12-18 Thread Tony Aiuto via cctalk
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> https://xkcd.com/1909/
>
> Our community isn't just about that, but it's part of what makes us tick.
>

Preserving knowledge is an ongoing problem and getting harder to solve.
Vint Cerf talks about it a lot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV0A82TCrf0
https://www.nitrd.gov/news/digital-vellum-and-archives.aspx


Re: IBM MT/ST recovery; was: IBM 3480 DEC TKZ60 inquiry

2017-12-18 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102662523

Digi-Data made a widget to read the tapes as well.


On 12/18/17 12:57 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
> Forgive the top-posting on my own post, but I think it's appropriate:
> 
> Evidently, the client used an MT/ST to emulate a 2741 and the
> organization had a S/360 with a 2495 Magnetc Cartridge Reader:
> 



Re: eBay: MEMOREX 3693-2 & 3690-2 Disc Drive Mainframe IBM 3370-2 VINTAGE

2017-12-18 Thread Curious Marc via cctalk
Excellent! Congrats Guy. Looks like modempot really needs to move out of his 
building in a hurry. I think between me, you, Carl, Bob, the museum and a few 
ebay buyers we got all of the big stuff saved. 
Marc

On Dec 17, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk 
 wrote:

To let folks now, I’ve acquired the drives and am currently making arrangement 
for one of
the local collectors to pick them up if I’m unable to and store them until I’m 
able to get them
to my place.  So they’ve been saved and I’m looking forward to being able to 
attach them
to my 4331.

TTFN - Guy

>> On Dec 16, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Guy Sotomayor Jr
> 
>> I *really* want them and I'm within an hour (usually) of where they
>> are. The problem is that right now I'm on a business trip until the end
>> of the month and he needs this gone prior to 12/31.
> 
> Why don't you reach out to the person and tell them you _really_ want them,
> maybe they'll be able to let it go until you get back?
> 
> Or is there someone in the Sacramanto area who can pick them up and hold them
> until Guy can get them? I would offer to, but I'm on the wrong coast :-(
> 
>Noel



Re: IBM MT/ST recovery; was: IBM 3480 DEC TKZ60 inquiry

2017-12-18 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
Forgive the top-posting on my own post, but I think it's appropriate:

Evidently, the client used an MT/ST to emulate a 2741 and the
organization had a S/360 with a 2495 Magnetc Cartridge Reader:

http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-ProdAnn/2495-5.pdf

I have to confess that I've never seen one of these "in the flesh".  I
doubt that any exist today, but I'll be happily disabused of this notion.

--Chuck


On 12/18/2017 09:14 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:

> Well, this is part of the job.  I got the potential client to send a
> photo of the cartridge--and he managed to get a 3480 cartridge for
> comparison.
> 
> It's clearly an IBM MT/ST cart:
> 
> https://imgur.com/a/K9vyg
> 
> Anyone around who can recover the data from these things?
> 
> --Chuck


XKCD on what we're doing

2017-12-18 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
https://xkcd.com/1909/

Our community isn't just about that, but it's part of what makes us tick.

paul



Re: IBM MT/ST recovery; was: IBM 3480 DEC TKZ60 inquiry

2017-12-18 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 12/17/2017 09:52 PM, Jon Elson wrote:

> There were several DIFFERENT formats used with these standard tape
> cartridges.  I have some old CDC Patriot tape drives that did a
> serpentine single track at a time format on a 3480-compatible tape. I
> don't think any DEC drive supported the 18-tracks-wide IBM 3480 format. 
> I think DEC's drives were also serpentine.  If they are really from an
> IBM compatible system (really too late for 360, most likely 370 systems)
> then I think only an IBM-compatible drive would read them.  Wikipedia
> says the 3480 was introduced in 1984.

Well, this is part of the job.  I got the potential client to send a
photo of the cartridge--and he managed to get a 3480 cartridge for
comparison.

It's clearly an IBM MT/ST cart:

https://imgur.com/a/K9vyg

Anyone around who can recover the data from these things?

--Chuck


Re: Odd Connections to Rectifier?

2017-12-18 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Rob Jarratt via cctalk
 wrote:
> I am reverse engineering the schematic for the input stage of my H7862 PSU.
> I have come across a KBU6J bridge rectifier which seems to be connected only
> to the two middle pins, which are the AC inputs. I can't see any other
> connections. Before I desolder it to verify there are no connections I can't
> see, does this make any sense?

I don't think it makes sense. With no connections to the other pins
(+ve and -ve DC
out I assume) then there is no DC (or AC) path through the rectifier,
whatever the input,
at least one diode is reverse-biased. Unless you are depending on the
diodes to break
down in a controlled way (and I can't believe it depends on that) then
the bridge will do
nothing.

-tony


Re: Odd Connections to Rectifier?

2017-12-18 Thread Peter Coghlan via cctalk
>
> I am reverse engineering the schematic for the input stage of my H7862 PSU.
> I have come across a KBU6J bridge rectifier which seems to be connected only
> to the two middle pins, which are the AC inputs. I can't see any other
> connections. Before I desolder it to verify there are no connections I can't
> see, does this make any sense?
>

If it is the main rectifier, continuity checks should show a dead short from
the other two pins to the main smoothing capacitor(s) or maybe a very low
resistance through a surge limiting resistor or inductor either of which should
be easy to spot once you know what to look for.

If it is not the main rectifier, could the AC inputs be connected across a
current sensing resistor in the mains input with the DC outputs going to an
optoisolator or something like that?  Seems a bit unlikely though as the
voltage drop across the rectifier would likely be too large compared to the
voltage available across any current sensing resistor.

Regards,
Peter Coghlan.


Re: Odd Connections to Rectifier?

2017-12-18 Thread Brent Hilpert via cctalk
On 2017-Dec-18, at 12:06 AM, Rob Jarratt via cctalk wrote:
> I am reverse engineering the schematic for the input stage of my H7862 PSU.
> I have come across a KBU6J bridge rectifier which seems to be connected only
> to the two middle pins, which are the AC inputs. I can't see any other
> connections. Before I desolder it to verify there are no connections I can't
> see, does this make any sense?

It's barely conceivable it could be getting used as a clamp or snubber.

If you haven't found another bridge or rectifiers for the mains rectification,
then keep looking for unseen connections to this bridge.

Odd Connections to Rectifier?

2017-12-18 Thread Rob Jarratt via cctalk
I am reverse engineering the schematic for the input stage of my H7862 PSU.
I have come across a KBU6J bridge rectifier which seems to be connected only
to the two middle pins, which are the AC inputs. I can't see any other
connections. Before I desolder it to verify there are no connections I can't
see, does this make any sense?

 

Thanks

 

Rob