On 02/26/2018 04:18 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 2/25/2018 10:40 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Douglas Taylor via
cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
I have a BA11-M box with the usual front panel control,
however it was
damaged and all three
On 2/25/2018 10:40 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
I have a BA11-M box with the usual front panel control, however it was
damaged and all three switches have been sheared off. The LED's and
the
circuit
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Jay West via cctalk wrote:
The OP was being sarcastic. Please not this thread again.
. . . and a sarcastic response just further exacerbates the situation.
Sorry.
The purpose of an emulator is to accurately pretend to be the original
hardware. It doesn't matter that the original OS runs on a particular
emulator. If a program can be written that runs on the original hardware
but fails on the emulator then there is a flaw in that emulator.
On Mon, 26 Feb
Yeah, the fact that the issue is intermittent (mostly not booting) is
weird.
Just to be clear, You mentioned a 25 pin connector. My understanding is
that the console port is the printer port which is a 9 pin connector.
Thanks for the info. I have ordered the stuff to make a cable so should
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Another example is the work pdp2011 had to do in order to make RSTS boot on
> that FPGA based PDP-11 emulation, because RSTS was doing some CPU-specific
> hackery to test for an obscure CPU (or FPU?) bug
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Rola via cctalk"
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Why don't you respect the mail threads?!
> ... I do not feel the need to have
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Doug Ingraham via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> The purpose of an emulator is to accurately pretend to be the original
> hardware. It doesn't matter that the original OS runs on a particular
> emulator. If a program can be written that runs on
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:36:08PM -0500, Evan Koblentz via cctalk wrote:
> It's gone meta: people threadjacking a thread about threadjacking.
> Now it's some posters trying to show others who is smartest about
> arcane details of obsolete email software.
Hey, I hope you do not mean that I am
> From: Kurt Hamm
> If anyone has any thoughts, I would appreciate it.
You probably already know this, but... My sense is that a collector of
classic computers has to be able to diagnose and repair at the component
level - get in there with an oscilloscope and a set of prints (creating
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Rick Murphy via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 2/21/2018 5:14 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Ok, then it could be for VMS, which also does this (via Andy's
>> unsupported driver). I don't know of PDP-11 or other minicomputer systems
>> that
I SUCK at basic arithmetic.
But i'm stupidly fast with a slide rule.
I'm in between useless and obtuse!
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Zane Healy wrote:
>
>> I’ve started seeing toys (mainly action figures) from
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:39 PM, Kurt Hamm via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. Interestingly, upon first boot I was able to
> get the hard disk controller error with the picture of the computer. Then,
> sure subsequent reboots failed to display anything.
Hello again,
On 24.02.2018 04:42, Adrian Stoness via cctalk wrote:
so did u get it?
Yes, I won the auction at a badly high price.
:-) :-) :-) :-)
Kind regards
Philipp
14 matches
Mail list logo