My speculation would be that TU58 did not add anything of value or
convenience to these systems.
I used Ultrix-11, V7M, Venix in this era. My recollection is that in
most cases to build these systems and patch them, you needed regular
access to 800/1600 BPI tape. Given this relatively standa
On 2/3/19 5:13 PM, GREEN wrote:
> I built support under V6 all in user space. That would be in the early 1980s
> and I don’t recall it being very difficult. I suspect others did that as
> well. Have you tried looking in the USENIX tapes?
>
I will probably look at writing a driver once I have so
I built support under V6 all in user space. That would be in the early 1980s
and I don’t recall it being very difficult. I suspect others did that as well.
Have you tried looking in the USENIX tapes?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 3, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> O
On 2/3/19 3:41 PM, Aaron Jackson wrote:
> TU-58 support wouldn't need to be in the kernel, it could easily run in
> user space. Perhaps someone had written an application in user-space to
> dump TU-58 tapes.
I was looking for a device driver and when I didn't find it I
looked at SPD's and release
Hi
I'm restoring a PDP-8/a with the help of some
friends. The CPU is now passing the MAINDECs I've
thrown at it. The memory is a modern semiconductor
board my friend Anders Sandahl made.
This machine is pieced together from several others
and the limited function panel I got does not match
t
TU-58 support wouldn't need to be in the kernel, it could easily run in
user space. Perhaps someone had written an application in user-space to
dump TU-58 tapes.
Aaron.
Bill Gunshannon via cctalk writes:
> Here's a question for someone who has been around long enough to
> remember.
>
> Why did
> From: Bill Gunshannon
> Why did none of the available PDP-11 Unixes support the TU-58?
> I have looked at Ultrix-11, V7M and BSD 2.11
The 'TUHS' list might be more likely turn up the reasoning?
Noel
Here's a question for someone who has been around long enough to
remember.
Why did none of the available PDP-11 Unixes support the TU-58?
I have looked at Ultrix-11, V7M and BSD 2.11 (didn't try 2.9
but I suspect if it isn't in 2.11 it wasn't in 2.9) and none
of them had support for the TU-58. S
Are these bare boards you would sell, or populated? (I would guess the
former, yes?)
Price (for both the MFM reader and the SA1000 adapter)?
JRJ
On 2/1/2019 7:37 PM, David Gesswein via cctech wrote:
> I have made a SA1000 adapter board for my MFM reader emulator. I did a
> small run which seems
At 07:43 AM 2/2/2019, you wrote:
>Are these bare boards you would sell, or populated? (I would guess the
>former, yes?)
>
>Price (for both the MFM reader and the SA1000 adapter)?
I think that's all at http://www.pdp8online.com/mfm/ .
- John
Hi.
Has anybody got a copy of this? It's a viewdata host program.
https://www.cbronline.com/news/applied_telematics_adds_minitel_access_from_uk_to_its_viewdata_software/
Even better would be an installed database..
Ta.
Rob.
--
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse brevity or spoiling mist
11 matches
Mail list logo
