http://matthieu.benoit.free.fr/databooks.htm Looks like a fellow in France
wants to give away/trade a lot of documentation.
https://www.intel-vintage.info/
https://www.intel-vintage.info/intelotherresources.htm
Note the Copyright says no copyright, take what you need freely. There is a
LOT of
Thanks Al!
The archived version is available for free here
https://archive.org/details/ArcherSemiconductorReferenceGuide1984
Cindy
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al Kossow via
cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:02 PM
To: cc
https://www.biblio.com/cart.php?bid=9512792
On 11/13/19 7:11 PM, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote:
> A complete guide to semiconductor replacement and
> substitutions from the makers of PHOTOFACT(R) service documentation.
On Nov 13, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
> What do you need to do to use an acoustic modem with a cellphone?
> You can get a "retro" handset for a cellphone, that will fit the rubber cups,
> but, will it work?
Yes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQqWHLZjOjA
--
Follow me on
Does anyone have a copy of this, or something similar? Prefer digital
format, if possible.
Jameco Part number 159791 $29.95 61140 SEMICONDUCTOR CROSS REFERENCE on
CD-ROM Enhanced Version A complete guide to semiconductor replacement and
substitutions from the makers of PHOTOFACT(R) service docu
On 2019-Nov-13, at 5:22 PM, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote:
> ... I can simply connect 2 modems to each
> other via a POTS phone cable, attach each modem via serial cable to a
> different laptop, and set one to Listen and the other to Answer via
> HyperTerminal.
This will work for some modems,
On 11/13/19 5:25 PM, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote:
And here my problem is that I have the old modems, but I can't test
them because I no longer have a land line.
~chuckle~
Is there any way to test an internal or external modem without anything
except broadband or cellular connections?
A "telephone line simulator".
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Electronics Plus wrote:
A young gent (about 22 yrs old) reminded me of HyperTerminal on XP. Since I
have stacks of old working XP laptops, I can simply connect 2 modems to each
other via a POTS phone cable, attach each modem via serial cable to
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred Cisin
via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:08 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: RE: Question about modems
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Electronics Plus via cctalk w
The 3000 parts were bit slice processors. There were only a few instructions
involved in there execution. Much of the action was on in the code as you'd
think of a typical uP. In other words, there were not specific I/O instructions
causing various actions. In may cases, just having the processo
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote:
And here my problem is that I have the old modems, but I can't test them
because I no longer have a land line. Is there any way to test an
internal or external modem without anything except broadband or cellular
connections? I know I can't
The case presented is an true corner case. Usually modems can be set
for rate, bits, and parity that matches the target system. AS modem
became more sophisticated (26/33/56k) they were easily set and I just a
few I have. Older 300/1200/2400 baud modems like DEC DF02/03 had
switch settings lik
On 11/13/2019 3:41 PM, Nigel Johnson via cctalk wrote:
No. While each end might be able to communicate with the local modem
in command mode using different parameters, when they are in connected
mode the modems will not convert anything, just pass the exact format
along. So if one end is expect
On 11/13/19 4:16 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
> On 11/13/19 1:31 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>> But, stuff like commands to the modem didn't need much of that, and
>> needed to be able to communicate in spite of wrong parameters. It
>> made sense for a modem to recognize a command, even
On 11/13/19 2:41 PM, Nigel Johnson via cctalk wrote:
No. While each end might be able to communicate with the local modem in
command mode using different parameters, when they are in connected mode
the modems will not convert anything, just pass the exact format along.
So if one end is expectin
No. While each end might be able to communicate with the local modem in
command mode using different parameters, when they are in connected mode
the modems will not convert anything, just pass the exact format along.
So if one end is expecting 7E2 and the other is sending 8N1 there will
be a 50
On 11/13/19 1:31 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
But, stuff like commands to the modem didn't need much of that, and
needed to be able to communicate in spite of wrong parameters. It made
sense for a modem to recognize a command, even with wrong parity, etc.
Okay
Now I'm thinking that t
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Are you sure that the parity stripping (for lack of a better description) was
meant to translate things between modems? I would speculate that it was to
transition from serial communications which inherently depend on those
settings to TCP co
The following is based on my limited understanding. I could easily be
wrong. Please correct me if I am.
On 11/13/19 12:25 AM, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
Some time ago, Chris Osborn (FozzTexx) forked a copy of my project to
fix some bugs and he also added in some parity code, which looks to
And, more than one different model!
A bunch of yuears ago, Joe Campbell ("C Programmer's Guide To Serialo
Communication", "RS232 Solution", etc, NOT the PBS Joe Campbell) told me
that he was doing some consulting for Hayes, about setting up the standard
for "Hayes Compatible"; it seemed that n
On Nov 13, 2019, at 10:41, Nigel Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/2019 13:36, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>> There are other "oddball" combinations, such as 8E1 and 8O1, which sends
>> a 9-bit data frame. You can see datasheets on some UARTs as well as MCU
>> UARTs that support the 9 bit packet.
On 11/13/19 10:41 AM, Nigel Johnson via cctalk wrote:
>
> On 13/11/2019 13:36, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>> There are other "oddball" combinations, such as 8E1 and 8O1, which sends
>> a 9-bit data frame. You can see datasheets on some UARTs as well as MCU
>> UARTs that support the 9 bit packe
On 13/11/2019 13:36, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
There are other "oddball" combinations, such as 8E1 and 8O1, which sends
a 9-bit data frame. You can see datasheets on some UARTs as well as MCU
UARTs that support the 9 bit packet.
According to the diagram of the Smartmodem there is no UART,
There are other "oddball" combinations, such as 8E1 and 8O1, which sends
a 9-bit data frame. You can see datasheets on some UARTs as well as MCU
UARTs that support the 9 bit packet.
Also, don't/doesn't TDD (5 level code) use 5E2 or some such. Same for
Telex/TWX.
--Chuck
On 11/11/19 12:27 AM, Eric Moore via cctech wrote:
Hello, I have a working AED WINC08 drive, which is a winchester drive
emulated to look like an RL02, along with the qbus controller card.
https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_aedbrochurJan82_2107642/page/n1
The winchester drive itself is a fuj
Not much in the manual. I browsed it looking for anything about data
bits and stop bits. Nothing.
p1-2: ' Commands given to the Smartmodem must be ASCII coded at baud
rates between 110 baud and 1200 baud. Once 'on-line', any code at any
speed from 0 to 300 baud may be used.'
p 9-1 'Do not s
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk
> wrote:
> Sure. Works for me. There are, in all, likely well over 1000 fiche...
> 3) I have several sets. Which of them would you want to scan?
>
> On 11/13/2019 12:02 AM, Josh Dersch wrote:
>>
>> If you're willing to send them out, th
On Nov 13, 2019, at 6:40, allison wrote:
>
> On 11/13/19 9:17 AM, geneb via cctalk wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> Did Hayes modem really do that? I thought most later modems self
>>> detected parity and speed and thus would have switched both the comm
>>> on th
On Nov 13, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Jim Brain via cctalk
wrote:
> On 11/13/2019 7:47 AM, Alexandre Souza via cctalk wrote:
>> Jim, its a long time I don't use it, but I've used other configurations
>> beyond 8N1 and I remember when you put the modem in 7E1 it mirrored the
>> configuration of the oth
On 11/13/2019 5:31 AM, Nigel Johnson via cctalk wrote:
I actually have an original Hayes 300 modem. Would it be any use if I
could set it up for a a test, or would it need another genuine Hayes
one to talk to for what you need?
I looked at the SmartModem 300. It looks like it completely detec
Sure. Works for me. There are, in all, likely well over 1000 fiche,
maybe even more than 2000. Many fiche have multiple documents on them
(e.g. module documents), some have more than one fiche to a document
(e.g. diagnostic listings).
All told, in their boxes and envelopes, 25lbs or more, so ma
On 11/13/2019 7:47 AM, Alexandre Souza via cctalk wrote:
Jim, its a long time I don't use it, but I've used other
configurations beyond 8N1 and I remember when you put the modem in 7E1
it mirrored the configuration of the other side. If you had a vax with
a 2400 7E1 port, you gotta have in the
I actually had a dream last night about a wide-format dot-matrix printer
coming into my life.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:59 PM Dave Wade via cctalk
wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> Any one got any interest in any dot-matrix printers. Got a Panasonic wide
> carriage, DEC narrow carriage, and a Tandy DMP200
Folks,
Any one got any interest in any dot-matrix printers. Got a Panasonic wide
carriage, DEC narrow carriage, and a Tandy DMP200..
Dave Wade
G4UGM & EA7KAE
On 11/13/19 9:17 AM, geneb via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
>
>> Did Hayes modem really do that? I thought most later modems self
>> detected parity and speed and thus would have switched both the comm
>> on the serial port and the data sent to the other side i
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
Did Hayes modem really do that? I thought most later modems self detected
parity and speed and thus would have switched both the comm on the serial
port and the data sent to the other side in the same parity (if the terminal
was 7E1, the modem
Jim, its a long time I don't use it, but I've used other configurations
beyond 8N1 and I remember when you put the modem in 7E1 it mirrored the
configuration of the other side. If you had a vax with a 2400 7E1 port,
you gotta have in the terminal 2400 7E1
So, you gotta match the configuration
I actually have an original Hayes 300 modem. Would it be any use if I
could set it up for a a test, or would it need another genuine Hayes one
to talk to for what you need?
cheers,
Nigel
On 13/11/2019 02:25, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
I am the author of tcpser, a UNIX/Windows program that e
Hi everyone,
I'm planning to expand my MAME-based emulation of Intel MDS-II systems
with the support for double-density floppy disks. In particular, I'm
thinking of emulating the isbc202 floppy controller because its
architecture looks very interesting. This board was based on Intel's own
300
39 matches
Mail list logo
