Hey Cindy,
Sorry to hear the bad news. I've been swamped with the "new" job so not
always following the lists these days. Let me know if you need any other
help. I'm happy to help how I can.
- John
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 10:05 AM Electronics Plus via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> My
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 12:22 AM steven--- via cctech
wrote:
> Bill said
> > Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
> > DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's
> inefficient
> > and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a
I have several, but can only get to a few RS232 readers. If you are
interested
I'll try to get the model numbers later this week.
I also have several REMEX interfaces probably Unibus, possibly a Omnibus.
Paul
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:21 PM Tony Duell via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 4/28/20 1:14 PM, r.stricklin via cctalk wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctech wrote:
>
>> Rather than try to clean the gunk off the tape, which is probably a
>> fool's errand, I coat the tape with cyclomethicone
>
> Just as a word of caution, I've had at least one
For those of you who have used Dunfield's PTR program and the OP-80A, what
PC did you use? I am attempting with a Compaq 486. I apparently have to
add resistors to some of the lines to control voltage from the normally
outbound parallel port.
I may switch to the SOL-20 and use that computer's
Bill said
> Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
> DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's inefficient
> and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a reliable
> papertape reader for sale, or recommend one currently out there
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:34 PM David Collins via cctech
wrote:
>
> Further to Dave’s post below, I’m happy to share the Arduino code and
> schematic if anyone has a suitable reader and wants to try it. It was indeed
> designed to interface to the HP2748 but is pretty simple and could be
On Apr 28, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctech wrote:
> Rather than try to clean the gunk off the tape, which is probably a
> fool's errand, I coat the tape with cyclomethicone
Just as a word of caution, I've had at least one catastrophic outcome trying
this with a QIC tape. Use too
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 17:56, Tony Duell via cctech wrote:
> The HP2748 is a common-ish example of this type of un[i]t.
David Collins of the HP Computer Museum and I just recently completed
reading some 200+ paper tapes from the museum collection. He used a 2748
coupled with a custom
Further to Dave’s post below, I’m happy to share the Arduino code and schematic
if anyone has a suitable reader and wants to try it. It was indeed designed to
interface to the HP2748 but is pretty simple and could be adapted to any
similar reader.
David Collins
Sent from my iPad
> On 29 Apr
I have run TSX+ since the early 80's. I developed a few handlers to
do graphics on a Peritek VRG-Q and also for data acquisition.
Nothing like like an J-11, 4Mb and a hard disk to make a excellent
personal workstation back then. RXV21's were not a problem as TSX+
(>v6 I think) could
On 4/28/20 5:53 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
This talk of old tape brings up a question that I wanted to ask the list.
I've run into some tapes that say they were prepared on the IBM DCS
setup (7044-coupled-to-7094) running DCOS.
I confess to never having run into the 7044 in real
This talk of old tape brings up a question that I wanted to ask the list.
I've run into some tapes that say they were prepared on the IBM DCS
setup (7044-coupled-to-7094) running DCOS.
I confess to never having run into the 7044 in real life--it always
seemed like an odd machine--basically, a
So I got the RX02 drive up and going with the RXV11 controller. Man it's
interesting to hear those old disks *click*. Both work (which is good)
and now I'm starting to look through my old disks.
Interesting issue: Many of my disks are formatted RX02. So I need to dig
out my RXV21 controller
Rick Merrill is doing well last time I exchanged comments with him.
We wired in 8 engineering, DecComm11, and LCG together over the years.
I will have to rattle his cage just for fun now.
bb
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:29 PM Lyle Bickley via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:58:59 -0400
>
sony PR-150 will jam a machine up and makes a squeeking type noise as well.
then theres sticky shed syndrom that leaves a nasty mess caugh shamrock
tape caugh caugh
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:47 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised that this is even a
Out of curiosity has anyone tried running tapes at different temperatures,
for instance in a relative cold or hot environment? Either on a simple
winder or even a recovery drive.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:47 AM Chuck Guzis via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised that
On 4/28/20 3:37 PM, Alan Perry via cctalk wrote:
wiping the posts with acetone or wiping the tape with cyclomethicone? Should I be baking the tapes? If so, what is a safe way to bake QIC
cartridges?
I bake the carts with the bands removed and the covers off in a food dehydrator
I also wrap
On 4/28/20 11:47 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
I'm a bit surprised that this is even a "thing" in the audio business.
Restorers have been baking audio tapes for a long time.
That is acknowledged in the slides, isn't it?
"Thermal Baking: A popular, poorly understood remedy"
"Most
On 4/28/20 11:47 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
For whatever it's worth
Magnetic tape recovery people live in silos
I doubt anyone at LoC has ever even heard of you or me, or that they will ever
see the years of discussions we've had on this subject. I wonder if
they he even talked to the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:01 PM Bill Degnan via cctech
wrote:
>
> Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
> DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's inefficient
> and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a reliable
> papertape
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 12:01 PM, Bill Degnan via cctech
> wrote:
>
> Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
> DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's inefficient
> and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a reliable
>
Bill, I have one of the models (not sure which one would have to climb around
in the warehouse of these http://www.baudot.net/teletype/M43.htm From memory,
it looks like the M3450. Welcome to borrow it! But it could also be one of
the others on this page
Bob
-Original Message-
On 04/28/2020 11:01 AM, Bill Degnan via cctech wrote:
Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's inefficient
and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a reliable
papertape reader for sale
I'm a bit surprised that this is even a "thing" in the audio business.
Restorers have been baking audio tapes for a long time.
One thing not discussed (maybe it doesn't occur in audio) is that there
can be issues in binder formulation, at least in digital tapes. In
particular, 3M tapes, most
> From: Paul Koning
> I suppose they still charge you an insurance fee according to what you
> declared as the value?
Yes, IIRC.
> This seems like a pretty clear case of fraud, and you should report it
> to the authorities.
Well, at the time, I thought it was just a local
At 05:56 AM 4/28/2020, you wrote:
>https://www.morressier.com/article/towards-understanding-thermal-remediation-degraded-archival-reeltoreel-audio-tapes/5e736c6bcde2b641284abb13
Lower right pic on "layers in contact" slide, looks like it was inverted...
- John
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:58:59 -0400
Chris Zach via cctalk wrote:
> NL7776 /SETUP -2
> TAD (-7776) /COMPARE TO EXPECTED VALUE
> SZA CLA /SKIP IF OK
> JMP IMA8S /JUMP IF RETARDED BROTHER
>
> / IF WE GET HERE,
Hi - COVID project I have been attempting to read some old Honeywell
DDP-516 papertapes using the OP-80A or Teletype reader but it's inefficient
and I don't want to damage the tapes. Does anyone have a reliable
papertape reader for sale, or recommend one currently out there on Ebay,
for the
I have mixed experiences with filing a complaint to the state AG's office. In
one case, I got very quick resolution. In the other case, they just blew it
off.
But I recommend giving it a shot.
alan
Take them to small claims court.
My friend beat UPS when they tried to screw him over. And the
On 4/28/20 8:32 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
Anyway, you could sure write a letter to your state attorney general's
office. I have gotten surprising results when making complaints. A
couple years ago, Wagreens has deceptive yellow 2 for 1 labels in their
OTC drug and vitamin shelves.
On 04/28/2020 09:50 AM, Norman Jaffe via cctalk wrote:
And UPS isn't any better.
I had a package delivered with a big hole in it, and they claimed that it was
given to them that way.
However, the hole was right through their shipping documents...
I have sworn off UPS since the 1990's after they
On 04/28/2020 09:12 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
I suppose they still charge you an insurance fee according to what you declared
as the value?
This seems like a pretty clear case of fraud, and you should report it to the
authorities.
Yes, seems correct to me. One thing to note, at
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:50 AM, Norman Jaffe via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> And UPS isn't any better.
> I had a package delivered with a big hole in it, and they claimed that it was
> given to them that way.
> However, the hole was right through their shipping documents... they refunded
> the
Quick question: Does anyone have a copy of dx.sys for RT11 version 5.5?
I'm getting my RX01 disk running but don't seem to have this driver and
the 5.1 driver does. not. work. under 5.5
Thanks!
Chris
And UPS isn't any better.
I had a package delivered with a big hole in it, and they claimed that it was
given to them that way.
However, the hole was right through their shipping documents... they refunded
the shipping, but not the insurance on the item that they had destroyed with
their
I suppose they still charge you an insurance fee according to what you declared
as the value?
This seems like a pretty clear case of fraud, and you should report it to the
authorities.
paul
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:08 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Hi, a heads-up on
Hi, a heads-up on sending expensive items via FedEx. They appear to have a new
policy, limiting honouring insurance coverage; so, in my opinion, they are
now unsuitable for shipping valuable items.
Data point 1: a couple of months back, I bought a PDP-11/40 on eBait. It was
shipped via FedEx in
On 4/28/20 3:56 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
https://www.morressier.com/article/towards-understanding-thermal-remediation-degraded-archival-reeltoreel-audio-tapes/5e736c6bcde2b641284abb13
https://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ARSCLIST;d144d59c.2004
https://www.morressier.com/article/towards-understanding-thermal-remediation-degraded-archival-reeltoreel-audio-tapes/5e736c6bcde2b641284abb13
On 4/27/2020 6:53 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
On 4/27/20 6:34 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
He said he had his own OS that he wanted me to try out
that wish has dragged on for decades
I hope whoever ends up with his estate knows people are interested in
P?S/8
41 matches
Mail list logo
