Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Tom Hunter via cctalk
You could try: http://www.jrfmagnetics.com/

Tom

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:06 PM Gary Oliver via cctalk 
wrote:

> On 2/8/22 14:14, Wayne S via cctech wrote:
> > Searched a lille bit for Western Magnetics.  Here’s a site that has some
> surplus heads, even a western magnetics onebut probably not the correct
> one. There is a corporate charter record for Western Magnetics in Minnesota
> dated 1964. Maybe this is the same company. There’s also a tape head from
> Michigan Magnetics. Maybe a merged company?
> >
> > https://www.surplussales.com/Equipment/magnetic-tape.html
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Feb 8, 2022, at 13:05, Ron Pool via cctech 
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the
> desire to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company
> already set up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that
> time? Does anyone know?
> >
> > A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at
> https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
> > The head has a label on it that reads:
> >   Western Magnetics
> >   Glendale Calif.
> >   Record
> >   7282
> >
> > I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate
> read, write, and erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on
> the above head's label hints to me this might be a write head.
> >
> > I found that and other DECtape photos at
> https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .
> >
> > -- Ron
> >
> >
> Thanks.  Hadn't seen the Minnesota information.  Found some references
> but not actual company info.  Did find a reference somewhere it Canada,
> but I couldn't tell if it was original or successor company.  At any
> rate, no web presence nor telephone numbers found (yet.)
>
> I've dealt with the SurplusSales (of Nebraska) many times.  His prices
> are usually pretty high (not obscene, but just not 'surplus' prices I'm
> used to.)  However, he is a first-rate dealer and when he says something
> is so, you can count on it.  Never had problem with anything I was
> willing to *PAY* for.  I scanned the list you provided and found only a
> few 'digital' devices, unfortunately.  I suspect from 7 and 9 track mag
> tape drives.  I will scan his site and send him a ping so he'll be on
> the lookout.
>
> -Gary
>
>
>


Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Gary Oliver via cctalk

On 2/8/22 14:14, Wayne S via cctech wrote:

Searched a lille bit for Western Magnetics.  Here’s a site that has some 
surplus heads, even a western magnetics onebut probably not the correct one. 
There is a corporate charter record for Western Magnetics in Minnesota dated 
1964. Maybe this is the same company. There’s also a tape head from Michigan 
Magnetics. Maybe a merged company?

https://www.surplussales.com/Equipment/magnetic-tape.html


Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 8, 2022, at 13:05, Ron Pool via cctech  wrote:


So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the desire 
to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company already set 
up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that time? Does 
anyone know?

A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
The head has a label on it that reads:
  Western Magnetics
  Glendale Calif.
  Record
  7282

I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate read, write, and 
erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on the above head's 
label hints to me this might be a write head.

I found that and other DECtape photos at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .

-- Ron


Thanks.  Hadn't seen the Minnesota information.  Found some references 
but not actual company info.  Did find a reference somewhere it Canada, 
but I couldn't tell if it was original or successor company.  At any 
rate, no web presence nor telephone numbers found (yet.)


I've dealt with the SurplusSales (of Nebraska) many times.  His prices 
are usually pretty high (not obscene, but just not 'surplus' prices I'm 
used to.)  However, he is a first-rate dealer and when he says something 
is so, you can count on it.  Never had problem with anything I was 
willing to *PAY* for.  I scanned the list you provided and found only a 
few 'digital' devices, unfortunately.  I suspect from 7 and 9 track mag 
tape drives.  I will scan his site and send him a ping so he'll be on  
the lookout.


-Gary




Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Feb 8, 2022, at 5:14 PM, Wayne S via cctech  wrote:
> 
> Searched a lille bit for Western Magnetics.  Here’s a site that has some 
> surplus heads, even a western magnetics onebut probably not the correct one. 
> There is a corporate charter record for Western Magnetics in Minnesota dated 
> 1964. Maybe this is the same company. There’s also a tape head from Michigan 
> Magnetics. Maybe a merged company?
> 
> https://www.surplussales.com/Equipment/magnetic-tape.html

Those all look like audio heads, nothing even vaguely resembling a DECtape head.

paul




Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Feb 8, 2022, at 4:04 PM, Ron Pool via cctech  wrote:
> 
>> So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the 
>> desire to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company 
>> already set up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that 
>> time? Does anyone know?
> 
> A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at 
> https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
> The head has a label on it that reads:
>  Western Magnetics
>  Glendale Calif.
>  Record
>  7282
> 
> I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate read, 
> write, and erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on the 
> above head's label hints to me this might be a write head.
> 
> I found that and other DECtape photos at 
> https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .

This picture https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/TU56_front.shtml?large shows 
the tape path clearly.  There is just one head assembly that performs reading 
as well as writing.  I don't know what "Record" refers to; the numbers near it 
look vaguely like a date code though not the usual year and week number.

The maintenance manual (on Bitsavers) speaks of a "read/write head" and has an 
illustration that shows one of the head elements with a "read/write coil".  So 
the implication is that (a) there isn't an erase head, and (b) the same head 
serves for read or write according to whether the coil is being driven or 
sensed.  Come to think of it, I think erase heads are an aspect of audio tapes, 
not relevant to computer tapes.

paul



Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Gary Oliver via cctalk

On 2/8/22 13:04, Ron Pool via cctech wrote:

So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the desire 
to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company already set 
up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that time? Does 
anyone know?

A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
The head has a label on it that reads:
   Western Magnetics
   Glendale Calif.
   Record
   7282

I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate read, write, and 
erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on the above head's 
label hints to me this might be a write head.

I found that and other DECtape photos at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .

-- Ron
  


Mine also says Western Magnetics, Glendale CA, but does not have a part 
number.  Just serial numbers.  At least I assume they are serial numbers 
"19984" and "19976".


I've seen evidence that a few souls in the 50s managed to make magnetic 
heads from scratch (heck, Ivan Sutherland is claimed to have made a 
functioning magnet drum storage device when he was in 12th grade,) so 
give the modern world of CNC milling and availability of every manner of 
sheet metal via Internet searchers, I figured their just *might* be a 
possibility of growing one of these from scratch - tolerances (other 
than head gap) appear pretty generous, but I just don't have enough info 
to crack what the coil construction is to be.  There may be enough 
information to do a stab at it, but I'm not sure I have the energy (or 
even the skill) to give it a credible effort.


I've seen evidence of 'head repair' services, but I doubt they include 
digging out the wires from solid epoxy.


Any information available would be appreciated.

-Gary





Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Gary Oliver via cctalk

On 2/8/22 13:04, Ron Pool via cctech wrote:

So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the desire 
to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company already set 
up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that time? Does 
anyone know?

A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
The head has a label on it that reads:
   Western Magnetics
   Glendale Calif.
   Record
   7282

I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate read, write, and 
erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on the above head's 
label hints to me this might be a write head.

I found that and other DECtape photos at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .

-- Ron
  


Mine also says Western Magnetics, Glendale CA, but does not have a part 
number.  Just serial numbers.  At least I assume they are serial numbers 
"19984" and "19976".


I've seen evidence that a few souls in the 50s managed to make magnetic 
heads from scratch (heck, Ivan Sutherland is claimed to have made a 
functioning magnet drum storage device when he was in 12th grade,) so 
give the modern world of CNC milling and availability of every manner of 
sheet metal via Internet searchers, I figured their just *might* be a 
possibility of growing one of these from scratch - tolerances (other 
than head gap) appear pretty generous, but I just don't have enough info 
to crack what the coil construction is to be.  There may be enough 
information to do a stab at it, but I'm not sure I have the energy (or 
even the skill) to give it a credible effort.


I've seen evidence of 'head repair' services, but I doubt they include 
digging out the wires from solid epoxy.


Any information available would be appreciated.

-Gary



--
-Gary



RE: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Ron Pool via cctalk
> So it sermsdectape heads are special. I don’t think Dec would have the desire 
> to make them internally so they probably contractef with a company already 
> set up to do that. Who were the big tape head manufacturers at that time? 
> Does anyone know?

A photo of the back of a TU56 DECtape head can be seen at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/pics/head_label.shtml?small .
The head has a label on it that reads:
  Western Magnetics
  Glendale Calif.
  Record
  7282

I've never seen a TU56 in person and have no idea if they have separate read, 
write, and erase heads or some other combo.  The "Record" notation on the above 
head's label hints to me this might be a write head.

I found that and other DECtape photos at 
https://www.pdp8online.com/tu56/tu56.shtml .

-- Ron
 



Re: PDP-11/34 CPU PROMS

2022-02-08 Thread Warner Losh via cctalk
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:04 PM Warner Losh  wrote:

> I found
> https://deramp.com/downloads/mfe_archive/011-Digital%20Equipment%20Corporation/08%20PDP-11/01%20PDP-1104-1134/05%20PDP-1104-1134%20Microcode/
> which has the source code...
>
> But I couldn't find the tools to use these files to create microcode
> images.
>

There's a small chance that the tools.tar.gz link on
http://www.ak6dn.com/PDP-11/M9312/ has these, but that's for a different
module so who knows...


> http://filedump.theglitchworks.net/software/vintage/dec/roms/bdv11_upgrade/
> has a number of ROM images. Don't know if they are the ones you want. What
> are the XX-X-XX numbers on the PROMs you are looking for?
>
> Warner
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 6:18 PM Rod Smallwood via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>   Jerry Walker and I have an 11/34 under restoration.
>>
>> We have run into a bit of a problem.
>>
>> On the M8266 CPU control board a defective 7404 (E111) has killed a
>> bunch of the PROMs holding the microcode.
>>
>> Does anybody have or can get images of the PROMs on this board so
>> replacement devices an be programmed.
>>
>> Rod
>>
>>
>>


Need 8mm or DLT-II tape?

2022-02-08 Thread Van Snyder via cctalk
I have many 8mm tapes. A few are new. First comers get new ones.

I have a few 8mm cleaning cassettes

I have about a dozen DLT-II tapes.

I have a Quantum DLT-II drive with wide SCSI LVD/SE interface

I have some Ultrium LTO fibre-channel SCSI drives that were removed
from a tape-mounting robot several years ago. I never used them in my
computers. The mounting bracket for one was modified to have an
internal power supply -- which might be inadequate.  I have one LTO
tape.

I have a 5.25" floppy drive.

Yours for the price of shipping, or local pickup OK.

Van Snyder
van.sny...@sbcglobal.net
La Crescenta, CA



Re: PDP-11/34 CPU PROMS

2022-02-08 Thread Warner Losh via cctalk
I found
https://deramp.com/downloads/mfe_archive/011-Digital%20Equipment%20Corporation/08%20PDP-11/01%20PDP-1104-1134/05%20PDP-1104-1134%20Microcode/
which has the source code...

But I couldn't find the tools to use these files to create microcode images.

http://filedump.theglitchworks.net/software/vintage/dec/roms/bdv11_upgrade/
has a number of ROM images. Don't know if they are the ones you want. What
are the XX-X-XX numbers on the PROMs you are looking for?

Warner


On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 6:18 PM Rod Smallwood via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
>   Jerry Walker and I have an 11/34 under restoration.
>
> We have run into a bit of a problem.
>
> On the M8266 CPU control board a defective 7404 (E111) has killed a
> bunch of the PROMs holding the microcode.
>
> Does anybody have or can get images of the PROMs on this board so
> replacement devices an be programmed.
>
> Rod
>
>
>


PDP-11/34 CPU PROMS

2022-02-08 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk

Hi

 Jerry Walker and I have an 11/34 under restoration.

We have run into a bit of a problem.

On the M8266 CPU control board a defective 7404 (E111) has killed a 
bunch of the PROMs holding the microcode.


Does anybody have or can get images of the PROMs on this board so 
replacement devices an be programmed.


Rod




Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk

On 2/8/22 16:35, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:

On 2/8/2022 5:22 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:

On 2/8/22 13:34, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Update on this:  I did put together a battery and 
voltage divider to test the AXV11.  The label on the A/D 
module says it brings the output from the multiplexer to 
one of the external pins.  I was able to verify that the 
voltage applied to a couple of the A/D inputs makes it 
through the multiplexer when selected using the CSR.  
The next output available is from the Sample and Hold, 
and this is always pegged at +12v.  Am I wrong to assume 
that the sample and hold will 'freeze' its output when 
the A/D go bit is set?


Well, it will probably only hold the approximate voltage 
for a few seconds, but should be long enough to see on a 
voltmeter.


Jon


I was only using a voltmeter to look at it.

I'm going to try 2 different measurements; (1) use a scope 
to look at the S signal on the AXV11 and see what it 
does over time, (2) look at the same S signal on the 
Data Translation board which seems to be working.


The S will likely have a FET as the switch element, and 
those might be fairly easily damaged by external pulses.  I 
opened up some comparable Xincom modules and made minor repairs.


Jon



Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Douglas Taylor via cctalk

On 2/8/2022 5:22 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:

On 2/8/22 13:34, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Update on this:  I did put together a battery and voltage divider to 
test the AXV11.  The label on the A/D module says it brings the 
output from the multiplexer to one of the external pins.  I was able 
to verify that the voltage applied to a couple of the A/D inputs 
makes it through the multiplexer when selected using the CSR.  The 
next output available is from the Sample and Hold, and this is always 
pegged at +12v.  Am I wrong to assume that the sample and hold will 
'freeze' its output when the A/D go bit is set?


Well, it will probably only hold the approximate voltage for a few 
seconds, but should be long enough to see on a voltmeter.


Jon


I was only using a voltmeter to look at it.

I'm going to try 2 different measurements; (1) use a scope to look at 
the S signal on the AXV11 and see what it does over time, (2) look at 
the same S signal on the Data Translation board which seems to be 
working.




Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk

On 2/8/22 13:34, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Update on this:  I did put together a battery and voltage 
divider to test the AXV11.  The label on the A/D module 
says it brings the output from the multiplexer to one of 
the external pins.  I was able to verify that the voltage 
applied to a couple of the A/D inputs makes it through the 
multiplexer when selected using the CSR.  The next output 
available is from the Sample and Hold, and this is always 
pegged at +12v.  Am I wrong to assume that the sample and 
hold will 'freeze' its output when the A/D go bit is set?


Well, it will probably only hold the approximate voltage for 
a few seconds, but should be long enough to see on a voltmeter.


Jon



Re: Anyone live in Minneapolis?

2022-02-08 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Steve at oldcomputers.net

> There are some vintage tablets in Minneapolis (Eden Prarire) that would
> like, but the seller will not ship.
> Any help?

When dealing with eBaiters who can't/won't ship, I have had good luck with
PakMail (http://www.pakmail.com/); for a usually reasonable fee, they will go
pick something up, package it properly, and ship it.

In my experience with them, the shipping cost may not have been the absolute
lowest possible I could have secured had I been on the spot, looking around,
but.. I wasn't on the spot, looking around. And they went to the person's
house, picked the thing up, and shipped it.

Noel


Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 9:20 AM Douglas Taylor via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any info on the A/D module?  Who made it?  Can you open
> it up?  Does XXDP have a test for this?

http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/PDP11_DiagnosticHandbook_1988.pdf
PDP11 DIAGNOSTIC HANDBOOK 1988, Page A-7:
VAXAB0.BIC ADV11-C/AXV11-C A/D CONVERTER TEST


Anyone live in Minneapolis?

2022-02-08 Thread Oldcompu via cctalk
There are some vintage tablets in Minneapolis (Eden Prarire) that would like, 
but the seller will not ship.

Any help? You will have to pay, pick up, and ship.
I would do it for you!

Thanks-
Steve in CA






Re: DECTape head problem

2022-02-08 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Feb 8, 2022, at 2:53 PM, Wayne S via cctech  wrote:
> 
> Since so many audio tape players and computer magtape units were made it 
> would stand to reason that there has to be a stash somewhere of tape heads 
> and it’s just a matter of finding where they are.
> Are there any part numbers on the dectape heads?

The schematics are bound to show DEC part numbers, but how those translate into 
supplier part numbers is anyone's guess.  Or perhaps they were made internaly 
by DEC?

In any case, DECtape heads are unusual.  Computer tapes are normally 1/2 inch 
wide (a few old tape drives had different widths, like the 14 track 1 inch CDC 
tape).  But DECtape and LINCtape are 3/4 inches wide, with 10 head positions.

Audio tapes are unlikely to be helpful; consumer reel to reel tape is 2 tracks 
(interleaved for when you flip over the reel?) 1/4 inch; professional decks 
might have 8 tracks or more on 1/2 or 1 or 2 inch wide tape, but I don't 
remember ever seeing 3/4 inch wide audio or instrumentation heads.

paul




Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk



> On Feb 8, 2022, at 2:34 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> Update on this:  I did put together a battery and voltage divider to test the 
> AXV11.  The label on the A/D module says it brings the output from the 
> multiplexer to one of the external pins.  I was able to verify that the 
> voltage applied to a couple of the A/D inputs makes it through the 
> multiplexer when selected using the CSR.  The next output available is from 
> the Sample and Hold, and this is always pegged at +12v.  Am I wrong to assume 
> that the sample and hold will 'freeze' its output when the A/D go bit is set?

You're correct, a S/H circuit is supposed to hold the value that was on its 
input at the time it was told to take the sample.  Typically it won't hold it 
"forever"; S/H circuits have a hold time spec chosen so it is substantially 
longer than the time it takes the A/D behind it to complete its measurement.

paul



Re: DEC AXV11-C analog board

2022-02-08 Thread Douglas Taylor via cctalk
Update on this:  I did put together a battery and voltage divider to 
test the AXV11.  The label on the A/D module says it brings the output 
from the multiplexer to one of the external pins.  I was able to verify 
that the voltage applied to a couple of the A/D inputs makes it through 
the multiplexer when selected using the CSR.  The next output available 
is from the Sample and Hold, and this is always pegged at +12v.  Am I 
wrong to assume that the sample and hold will 'freeze' its output when 
the A/D go bit is set?


At least the D/A's work on the AXV11 I have!  Glass half full.

Next tried the Data Translation DT2762 with the voltage divider source 
and this board appears to work correctly.  What I was able to observe 
was by applying different voltages to the input I see different binary 
values in the DBR.


The manual from bitsavers for this board lists a complete Macro 
diagnostic program in an appendix. Does anyone have an electronic copy 
of this Macro code?  Or the compiled utility?


Doug

On 2/6/2022 1:55 PM, Jerry Weiss via cctalk wrote:
These A/D systems use methods to isolate the sensitive analog signals 
from the electrical noise and ground plane of the computer.  Typically 
a differential input is standard, so you will probably need wire up 
two inputs.


If this is your first time with A/D, suggest you toggle in some code 
to trigger and report the A/D conversion repeatedly and use a small 
voltage battery with a potentiometer divider to drive the inputs.  
Most of the analog inputs should be high impedance and while not 
impervious, can take +- 30v w/o damage.


 Jerry




On 2/6/22 11:43 AM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
Yes, I am putting 1 into the CSR to start the conversion and I do get 
a 200(8) indicating that the conversion is complete.  I wonder if 
this means the A/D chip is OK but something else, like the 
multiplexer chip or gain amp is fried.


On 2/6/2022 12:33 PM, Jerry Weiss via cctalk wrote:
Are you triggering an A/D conversion via the CSR or external 
signal?  Then check the A/D done bit.


See  EK-AXV11-UG-02 Chapter 4.

   Jerry

On 2/6/22 11:20 AM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
I have one of these and would like to use it, however it appears to 
only partially work.  Here is what I have found that works and what 
doesn't:


1. CSR and DBR are present and operational.

2. Jumpers set to 'factory'.

3. D/A portion works, can deposit codes in ODT and see voltages out 
on DAC pins that change depending on the octal value deposited in 
CSR+4 or +6.


4. A/D portion returns full scale code, either 3777 (2's 
compliment) or  (offset binary) whether in the input is open or 
shorted to gnd.


I think the problem is that the A/D inputs are not exactly 
protected and damage has occurred to this portion in the past.


Does anyone have any info on the A/D module?  Who made it? Can you 
open it up?  Does XXDP have a test for this?


Doug