[cctalk] Re: Getting floppy images to/from real floppy disks.

2023-05-20 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/20/23 04:21, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:

> I was startled to discover my (long gone) Athlon XP box could only
> handle a single floppy drive. The BIOS has no option for a 2nd.
> 
> I can't imagine that was a significant cost saving.

It's a matter of pins.  I believe that it started when the "SuperIO"
chip started packing in more support for various peripheral functions
and the 2 pins for drive select and motor control of an extra drive were
viewed as least important.   Earlier versions of the chip often allowed
re-purposing the pins used for the parallel port as an interface for an
extra floppy--you saw this on laptop systems, which often had only one
floppy drive in any case.  cf.  Intel's PCISet chip sets.

--Chuck




[cctalk] Re: Getting floppy images to/from real floppy disks.

2023-05-20 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 23:40, Fred Cisin via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 May 2023, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> > I do remember that, because I carried around a USB key with an
>
> Thanks, everybody for the reminders of the Windoze history.

;-)
>
> I hereby formally retract my erroneous suggestion of a "386 98,SP2 desktop
> with floppies and USB",
> and replace my suggestion with:
> "a PC with USB and floppies", and let Tony decide what vintage to use.

Fully concur. If it were me, I'd probably suggest some box with from
the end of the era which came with an onboard floppy controller, and
dual-boot 98SE and some old Linux that can handle such a thing, like
Slackware or Debian. That would cover the most bases.

I was startled to discover my (long gone) Athlon XP box could only
handle a single floppy drive. The BIOS has no option for a 2nd.

I can't imagine that was a significant cost saving.


> I still suggest the possibility of a current machine for the interwebs,
> with thumb drive sneaker-net to an alder machine with USB and floppies.

Concur.


-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624 277612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884
Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053


[cctalk] Re: Rainbow H7842 PSU Fault

2023-05-20 Thread Peter Coghlan via cctalk



> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Coghlan via cctalk 
> > Sent: 10 May 2023 12:04
> > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> > 
> > Cc: Peter Coghlan 
> > Subject: [cctalk] Re: Rainbow H7842 PSU Fault
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > I will do all the suggested checks, but I won't be able to do this for
> > > a number of days. However, I wanted to understand something in the
> > meantime.
> > > The conditions I am applying are (I think!) what would happen during
> > > startup, and during startup the control board has to make the PWM run,
> > > otherwise the main switching transistor won't operate and the
> > > transformer won't operate to produce the -12V in the first place. So
> > > surely in the startup condition I am applying (which is to supply
> > > Vstart from a bench PSU) is valid? Where is the flaw in my reasoning here?
> > >
> > 
> > The PSU also gives a kick start to the -12V line by applying some negative
> > voltage probably around -15V to it via a 2k7 resistor (on sheet 1).  If you 
> > are
> > not providing this, perhaps this is why the -12V line is able to swing 
> > slightly
> > positive and upset conditions in the -12V current sense circuit enough to
> > prevent the PWM from starting?
> > 
> > Even if you are providing this resistor limited -12V startup supply, could 
> > it be
> > insufficient due to a faulty component leaking current from the -12V line to
> > ground meaning that the -12V line does not become sufficiently negative to
> > fulfil the startup conditions?
> > 
> > Could the PWM be managing to start up and run for a cycle or two and then
> > stop due to a fault in the PWM circuit somehow attempting to draw too much
> > current from the -12V line?  I don't see any connections from the -12V line 
> > to
> > the PWM so this is probably not the case.
> > 
> 
> So, I did the following test. I used my bench PSU to apply +12V to the
> regulator output and -12V to the actual -12V output. Under these conditions
> the PWM operated correctly. I repeated the test on the good PSU and the
> result was the same.
> 
> The good PSU drew 13mA on the -12V line and 92mA from the regulator side.
> The bad PSU was 16mA and 86mA respectively. When I test only applying +12V
> to the regulator output, the good PSU draws about 90mA and the bad one 140mA.
> 
> It is worth repeating that the PWM operates correctly on the good PSU when
> I only apply +12V to the regulator, but not on the bad one. I guess there
> must be some kind of short somewhere, but really not sure where it might be.
> It has to be something that is pulling the -12V line slightly higher. The
> only place where this seems like it could happen is around E1b I think.
> Perhaps there is a path through the positive input to E1b to Vcc on the
> LM393 (Control Module Sheet 1). Does that seem logical?

Ok, it looks like there is not a severe leak from the -12V line to ground then.

I am puzzled by the extra current draw on Vstart by the bad PSU but I'm not
sure that tracking this down would lead us to the real problem.

On the other hand, did you mention at one point that Vstart was varying?
If this is the case, the reason for this would probably need to be found and
fixed independent of whether it leads to finding the main problem as this is
supposed to be a stable supply.

I don't think there is likely to be any serious leakage via E1b because the
link to the -12V line is via a 75K resistor which would limit any leakage
current to roughly 160uA.  Of course this applies if the resistor really
is 75K and doesn't have carbon deposits bridging the tracks and connections
around it to somewhere else.

I would suggest looking carefully at the resistors around E3d to make sure
they have the correct values, especially the 360K resistor and making sure
there is no debris etc around these components that could be bridging any
connections associated with them to somewhere else, also that no connections
have been severed.  Problems here could be leading to E3d falsely triggering
when there is no real overload.

It might be useful to check the voltages and resistor values in the -12V
regulator and compare with same in the good power supply, especially the
voltage across the zener diode.

> >
> > Is this the same PSU whose chopper transistor exploded a while back?  Could
> > there be any carbon deposits remaining on the board or conductive
> > remnants wedged under components etc causing leakage from the -12V line
> > to ground?
> 
> The component nearest to the exploded transistor is the 10uF capacitor on
> the output of the 12V regulator. There are some carbon deposits on it. I did
> a cursory check for resistance and ESR and it seemed OK.
>

This capacitor is probably there to ensure the 7812 doesn't oscillate.  Looking
at Vstart with an oscilloscope should confirm that this is not an issue.  If
it doesn't have excessive leakage current and has approximately the correct
capacitance, it is probably ok.  However, if there is