Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-05 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Christian Corti wrote:

The EF50 has a Loctal base with eight pins. 5xx is Magnoval. 8x is Noval.


Correction: Loctal with nine pins ;-) How crazy...

Christian


Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-05 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018, Nico de Jong wrote:

E = 6.3v filament
F = Pentode
5x = B9G base

.. also known as Noval base


No, absolutely not ;-)
The EF50 has a Loctal base with eight pins. 5xx is Magnoval. 8x is Noval.

Christian


Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: William Donzelli

> Germany often gets the short end of the stick when it come to radar
> tech in World War 2

For those who are interested in German radar, there's a good book:

David Pritchard, "The Radar War: Germany's Pioneering Achievement
1904-45", 1989

which covers their systems in some detail. There's also:

Martin Streetly, "Confound and Destroy: 100 Group and the Bomber
Support Campaign", 1978

which contains a very interesting chapter about an exercise called "Post
Mortem", run immediately after the close of hostilities, from 25 June to 7
July, 1945, in which the Allies observed (from inside) the workings of the
German air warning network, including things like how well it coped with
various kind of jamming (window, as well as active).

Noel


Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread William Donzelli via cctalk
:> The high frequency power tubes were required for better spacial
resolution. My understanding was that major difference between the
German radar and allied was that the Germans had a single trace, like
a time domain reflectometer. The allies had a rotating image that is
similar to what we see on current radars, today.

Both sides had the displays you describe. The first is called A-scope,
and the latter PPI (Plan Position Indication). Consider that early
radar, well into the 1950s, was actually pretty horrible. PPI back
then often resulted in a screen full of indistinct smudges, so nearly
every search radar had the "old" A-scope, where the operator would use
a cursor* and get a very accurate range and azimuth reading.
Basically, the PPI scope was good for "the big picture" "show me all
the information", and the A-scope was good for getting the information
that was actually useful.

> The cavity tuned magnetron was clearly an issue because it allowed them to 
> run at a higher frequency than the split plate magnetron. Both were 
> significant changes in how things were done.

Significant, but only sometimes significant. Higher frequencies
produced by magnetrons were useful for bombing and gun laying (anti
aircraft and naval guns) as it improved range accuracy greatly, but it
did nothing for air search radars. VHF radars (with triodes) were
still in front line service until the 1950s, simply because they did a
much better job at illuminating aircraft.  Germany often gets the
short end of the stick when it come to radar tech in World War 2, but
towards the end, their (non-magnetron) air search radars were some of
the best. Why? Because that is what they needed with their skies full
of Allied bombers.

The graphical real-time cursor and joystick, in one or two dimensions,
has its origin in World War 2 radar systems. It is astonishing how
many historical accounts of early computer graphics do not mention
this.

--
Will


Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread dwight via cctalk
The high frequency power tubes were required for better spacial resolution. My 
understanding was that major difference between the German radar and allied was 
that the Germans had a single trace, like a time domain reflectometer. The 
allies had a rotating image that is similar to what we see on current radars, 
today. The cavity tuned magnetron was clearly an issue because it allowed them 
to run at a higher frequency than the split plate magnetron. Both were 
significant changes in how things were done.

Dwight



From: cctalk <cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org> on behalf of Nico de Jong via 
cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 7:23:13 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

Oh sh..l., It was a bit too quick
Apologies...
/Nico
- Original Message -
From: "ANDY HOLT via cctalk" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 3:52 PM
Subject: EF50 was Re: radar history


>E = 6.3v filament
> F = Pentode
> 5x = B9G base
>
> Andy

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 16135 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
Free Spam Filter for Outlook, Windows Live Mail & Thunderbird - 
SPAMfighter<http://www.spamfighter.com/len>
www.spamfighter.com
SPAMfighter and Microsoft have built the strongest and most effective anti spam 
filter for Outlook, Windows Live Mail, Outlook Express & Thunderbird




Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen



Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread Nico de Jong via cctalk
Oh sh..l., It was a bit too quick
Apologies...
/Nico
- Original Message - 
From: "ANDY HOLT via cctalk" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" 
<cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 3:52 PM
Subject: EF50 was Re: radar history


>E = 6.3v filament
> F = Pentode
> 5x = B9G base
>
> Andy 

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 16135 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen



Re: EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread Nico de Jong via cctalk
.. also known as Noval base
/Nico
- Original Message - 
From: "ANDY HOLT via cctalk" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" 
<cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 3:52 PM
Subject: EF50 was Re: radar history


>E = 6.3v filament
> F = Pentode
> 5x = B9G base
>
> Andy 

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 16135 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen



EF50 was Re: radar history

2018-03-04 Thread ANDY HOLT via cctalk
E = 6.3v filament
F = Pentode
5x = B9G base

Andy