On Jul 18, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Paul Berger via cctalk
wrote:
> I would think that any interpreted BASIC would do this or for that matter any
> interpreted language except maybe for APL
You'd think so but many BASIC dialects don't fully tokenize. Many leave in all
the extra spaces the user
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 1:21 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I would think that any interpreted BASIC would do this or for that matter any
> interpreted language except maybe for APL which is pretty much written with
> tokens anyway. One other exception I can think of is perl which
I would think that any interpreted BASIC would do this or for that
matter any interpreted language except maybe for APL which is pretty
much written with tokens anyway. One other exception I can think of is
perl which is stored as source text. Saving in tokenized form was good
for to
And so does the HP 85.
Marc
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> The HP9830 (1972) with it's ROM'ed BASIC works this way.
> LIST produces a 'cleaned up' version of the source code.
>
>
>
>> On 2018-Jul-17, at 1:21 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>
The HP9830 (1972) with it's ROM'ed BASIC works this way.
LIST produces a 'cleaned up' version of the source code.
On 2018-Jul-17, at 1:21 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk wrote:
> I should also mention that for the IBM S/23, once the BASIC program is
> entered, the original
> source is
I should also mention that for the IBM S/23, once the BASIC program is entered,
the original
source is discarded and only the tokenized code remains (comments are retained
as-is). The
LIST command runs a de-tokenizer and reconstructs the original source (well
close to it anyway).
TTFN - Guy
At 03:53 PM 7/14/2018, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Jul 2018, Ed Sharpe via cctalk wrote:
>>isn't the basic programs also stored in tokinized forms!?!?
>
>Yes.
>And the tokens are not the same between different brand implementations, or
>even between different versions, such
On 2018-07-14 5:10 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
> Apparently Eric Smith has already done so.
> http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/tsbutils/
>
>
> You can still send me back to the sixties.
>
Hey, form an orderly queue, please!
Apparently Eric Smith has already done so.
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/tsbutils/
You can still send me back to the sixties.
