Re: ACARD ARS-2000SUP versus SCSI2SD - round 1
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, pete wrote: > > I'd love to see results under IRIX, as I was thinking of trying one or both > > of those myself! > Seconded, though it looks like it'll be considerably slower than a real SCSI2 > hard drive. I'm not sure about that. I've got another ACARD unit (the faster SCA model) that I use in my Tezro. I also have a second disk (the Tezro can hold a couple) that's a spinning rust 15k Barracuda. I don't have numbers right now (next time I fire up my Tezro I'll get some). However, anecdotally, the ACARD disk (also predicated on a Samsung 850 Pro SATA SSD) will absolutely stomp the Barracuda's guts out in every stat and especially on latency. The main time I can "feel" it is when I run Photoshop or a browser. The SSD-based ACARD makes the system feel a lot faster. Pages finish loading faster, 'rqsall' takes about half as long, packages install much more quickly, and the silly delays you get when 'inst' is reading package metadata takes a lot less time. I curse at it only about half as much (I love IRIX but 'inst' and I aren't pals - I haze it often). I know that's all anecdotal, but I'm pretty sure I tested the disk when I first got it and it blew the rust-based drive away. I've just got my bench all covered with Quadra 700 parts and various jury-rigged SCSI cables so I can install from CDROM on a machine that doesn't have space for a CDROM etc.. When I finish refurbing this thing with a MacOS + A/UX 3 dual boot rig, I'll grab the SGIs. I'll try out the ACARD vs SCSI2SD on my R5k/180 Indy. -Swift
Re: ACARD ARS-2000SUP versus SCSI2SD - round 1
On 25/06/2016 12:15, Ben Sinclair wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Swift Griggswrote: Once I'm done I'll hook both of these up to a FreeBSD box, dd off full backups, then start over again and try with ZFS under FreeBSD via a PCI SCSI controller. Then again under IRIX if I still have the energy. I'd love to see results under IRIX, as I was thinking of trying one or both of those myself! Seconded, though it looks like it'll be considerably slower than a real SCSI2 hard drive. -- Pete Pete Turnbull
Re: ACARD ARS-2000SUP versus SCSI2SD - round 1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Swift Griggswrote: > > Once I'm done I'll hook both of these up to a FreeBSD box, dd off full > backups, then start over again and try with ZFS under FreeBSD via a PCI > SCSI controller. Then again under IRIX if I still have the energy. > I'd love to see results under IRIX, as I was thinking of trying one or both of those myself! Ben Sinclair b...@bensinclair.com
ACARD ARS-2000SUP versus SCSI2SD - round 1
Tested using "Raw block speed" test in LIDO 7 under MacOS: [SCSI2SD v5] READ: 891 KB/s WRITE: 728 KB/s [ACARD ARS-2000SUP] READ: 1621 KB/s WRITE: 1277 KB/s More info: The ACARD device contains a Samsung 850 Pro 128G SSD. The SCSI2SD contains a Samsung Pro+ 64GB micro SD and is running firmware v4.6, IIRC. Both are were attached to a Quadra 700 Macintosh running System 8.1 with 68 megs of RAM (4 onboard + 64MB in 16MB SIMMS, the max on the Quadra 700). I had them hooked up at the same time so I could use one to partition the other. The hard disk "driver" was the one provided by LIDO, but I also tried LaCie SilverLining 5's driver as well, but the performace was slightly worse. I tested in LIDO using it's raw speed test feature. It's probably only a rough measure of sequential speed. I just tested three times and averaged the results, but it was within just a few KB/s each time. Once I'm done I'll hook both of these up to a FreeBSD box, dd off full backups, then start over again and try with ZFS under FreeBSD via a PCI SCSI controller. Then again under IRIX if I still have the energy. I'll give some results from 'fio' or 'iozone' under FreeBSD. Those will be a lot more detailed and break down sequential versus random results and show the results of various other permutations. I'd also like to test the SCSI2SD v6, but I can't get my hands on one, yet. The only place that talks about the v6 is the codesrc wiki and the American ebay retailer seems to only have the v5.0. I'll wait, I guess. -Swift